[SSI-devel] syntax for a range of node numbers - what's the current thinking?

[Smith, S. <sta...@in...>]

What's the current thinking on the syntax of how ranges of node numbers
are specified?

For small numbers of nodes, whitespace or punctuation character
separation (e.g., 1,2,3 or '1 2 3') work fine. The rub comes when you
have 100s/1000s of nodes. Personally, I've found the use of '..'  to be
an acceptable format; as in '3..21' which implies the inclusive,
sequential range of node numbers from 3 up to and including 21.

Thoughts on the issue?

Thanks,

Stan.

PS: If this is RTFM somewhere, please advise.