Re: [Sserver-three-d] New Model Discussion

[<n...@ai...>]

Dear Qingyuan Zhang,
Dear All,

Darwin op seems to be less interesting than NAO. The model is simply a
collection of boxes with reductions stages (via gears) with very limited
amplitudes due to motors size. Hardware access (as it is fully open) is
not really interesting. We have to plan to synthesize softwares, for a
wide range of humanoid models, closed and opened without differences.

Increasing the yaw angle max (for positive angles) on the current model
that simulates NAO, is easy to do. The current version of the simulator is
an old model of the NAO and this is different on new ones. With positive
yaw angles, we could rotate around a fixed point in front of the NAO.

Integrating different models of humanoid is also very interesting, but it
needs much work.

We have to avoid non realistic walks.
Maybe, integrating new physical foot contact is an interesting issue, that
allows to have different robots without much work. Surnatural walks are
probably linked to the exploitation of a long time trial of the
foot-ground contact model and modifying it could be interesting. It could
also be an opportunity to test the robustness of walks, that is a central
question for humanoid motions.

FCPortugal said that we could increase the ball size, that is maybe a good
and simple idea to promote real kicks during the game, promoting
multi-player soccer in the same time.

best regards
Nicolas (L3M-SIM)