From: Fredrik J. <jer...@sq...> - 2009-04-23 06:24:53
|
>> Modified: branches/SM-1_4-STABLE/squirrelmail/functions/i18n.php >> =================================================================== >> --- branches/SM-1_4-STABLE/squirrelmail/functions/i18n.php >> 2009-04-21 21:25:09 UTC (rev 13570) >> +++ branches/SM-1_4-STABLE/squirrelmail/functions/i18n.php >> 2009-04-22 06:03:25 UTC (rev 13571) >> @@ -853,8 +853,9 @@ >> $languages['is']['ALIAS'] = 'is_IS'; >> >> $languages['it_IT']['NAME'] = 'Italian'; >> -$languages['it_IT']['CHARSET'] = 'iso-8859-1'; >> -$languages['it_IT']['LOCALE'] = >> array('it_IT.ISO8859-1','it_IT.ISO-8859-1','it_IT'); >> +$languages['it_IT']['ALTNAME'] = 'Italiano'; >> +$languages['it_IT']['CHARSET'] = 'utf-8'; > > Is there any rhyme or reason as to the capitalization of "utf" here > (above) and below? I don't think so. "The MIME character set attribute for UTF-8 is UTF-8. Character sets are case-insensitive, so utf-8 is equally valid." [1] This seem to be the case (no pun intended) everywhere. Personally I almost always write "UTF-8" instead of "utf-8", but I guess either is fine in source code. I haven't seen any problems with either. >> +$languages['it_IT']['LOCALE'] = array('it_IT.UTF-8','it_IT'); >> > > On at least RedHat derivatives, the locale is named "it_IT.utf8" If I recall it correctly, UTF-8 was used in Debian. Can't really remember. Sincerely, Fredrik [1] http://utf-8.com/ |