[SM-USERS] sql and use in scripts

[Res <re...@au...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Question, is there any reason the primary identifier for address and 
userprefs tables are named differently?

Would be so much easier to have them called both user or both owner
rather than different one for each, makes life easier in scripts :)

Is there a technical reason as to why they are different? If not, can we 
look at adding a 'user' reference for the address table in the stable 1.5 
branch?

- -- 

Cheers
Res

Let Novell know what you think of their back door deal with the devil.
Sign the petition today:   http://techp.org/p/1/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGKdNNsWhAmSIQh7MRAn6gAKCMGGWvdWvPVPF9dypcaQCI+XAUuwCeMs9G
G5V2WM9aOTU3ReKJzD0P+sw=
=lA5w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----