From: <ja...@qv...> - 2006-08-18 14:26:04
|
>> Maybe I haven't got the point, but why not just use fetchmail >> to get the mail from server and filter it using maildrop thru any >> spamassassin|antivirus filter or rule ? > > On the server I cannot install maildrop for the reasons explained in > my previous message. What I want is: Forget maildrop, use procmail as a synonym. I don't know many differences= in their processing. > > 1) when I read email from squirrelmail, I want to see it displayed > in different folders (ie I don't really care or need to have it > *physically* stored in separate mail folders there on the server) > That's what procmail may do. Sort em into different physically existing folders (you've to create them in your IMAP server) > 2) when I am at home, I want to download with fetchmail ALL the email t= hat was > on the server in my home pc, no matter how it was sorted up there, i= n > how many folders and so on. Once it's there, I can (re)filter it wit= h > procmail etc... > yes, you may derict fetchmail only to load a *copy* of the message into S= M IMAP server. > At this point, the real issue basically seems to be: > > if I do 19 by setting squirremail+serversidefilter+procmail on the serv= er > to have messages in separate messages when reading email from the w= eb.... > > .. can I still do 2)??? My understanding is that fetchmail can only > download one mailbox (the inbox) per user from a server, and that pop3 > server can only send that inbox to pop3 clients. Is it so? If I'm wrong= , good Read more about fetchmail - it's capable of more than that (http://www.fetchmail.info/fetchmail-features.html). Live long and prosper Florian Squirrelmail patch forum http://www.qv90.de/sqm |