From: Thijs K. <ki...@sq...> - 2007-06-18 12:06:40
|
On Monday 18 June 2007 12:38, Eugene wrote: > Isn't it just a matter of rounding and different definitions of megabyte > (i.e. 1000000 vs 1024*1000 vs 1024*1024)? > If the file is indeed text then CR/LF conversion might play a role as well. > Anyway, difference is too small for base64... And I would expect SQM to > show real (decoded) attachment size. It's dependent on what the IMAP server can provide. To decode an attachment in memory just to display a small difference in size doesn't seem that good an idea to me. You should read it as "this is the amount of space it takes up in your mailbox". Thijs |