Re: [SM-DEVEL] vlogin plugin broken? (More on the "bad login" issues )

[Tomas K. <to...@us...>]

> FYI, we just put out a SquirrelMail Package, based on Debian, using some
> of the 'NutsMail' changes to the 1.4.x series, and some of our own simple
> changes.. which makes it really easy to ship and modify skins and themes..
>
> Looks great out of the box.. and so easy to modify look and feels with
> simple CSS changes..
>
> Would love to have our people do more work pushing code changes back to
> Squirrelmail, but every one is a little pressed for resources.
>
> If an active developer is interested, we could make the changes available,
> and maybe some of the changes can be brought into the mainstream distro..
>
> This would make it a lot easier for themes developers, like 'Nutsmail' not
> have to modify the actual code, just to make things look good.
>
> And it can be done fairly simply, in the interim of working out the more
> advanced issues that 1.5 series has to contend with..
>
> Attached Screenshots..
>
> Another FYI, if you are having challenges with Look/Feel.. Really do look
> at
> some of the NutsMail stuff.
>
> Once the code changes are in place, gives you a lot of power.
> Working on better virtualization now for clients.. but the basic code
> changes
> Nutsmail suggested, plus a few changes for flexibility, do have some
> potential that should be looked at for stable branch..

Find differences between http://nutsmail.com/orders/terms_of_service.php
and http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.php

Then remember that SquirrelMail 1.4.x "skins" can't be implemented without
modifications in SquirrelMail core scripts. Why do we have to listen to
company with such business model?

-- 
Tomas