From: Tomas K. <to...@us...> - 2005-12-22 06:32:41
|
> On Wed, December 21, 2005 11:34 pm, Michael Long wrote: > >> The functionality was already present before I made any changes...I >> simply reworked where/how it was being called, so I do not know what the >> original one was based on. For my own reference, I used: >> http://ietfreport.isoc.org/all-ids/draft-ietf-imapext-list-extensions-0 >> 3. >> txt (August 2003) >> >> >> I don't think it makes much difference though in this case as the >> implementation is very limited and simple...basically, using "LIST >> (SUBSCRIBED)" in place of "LIST" or "LSUB", and recognizing the >> additional attributes (mailbox flags) returned. >> >> Courier IMAP 3.0.8 >> >> >> >> >> >> Alexandros Vellis wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>> I would like to ask you about: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> ##### 1. LSUB/LIST/LIST (SUBSCRIBED) AND FOLDER CACHING >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We want to get the list of subscribed folders, and all of the >>>>> proper flags, as quickly as possible. >>>>> >>>>> If the server supports LIST-SUBSCRIBED, we can simply do a >>>>> LIST-SUBSCRIBED and get all pertinent information. Otherwise, we >>>>> do a LSUB, and then a LIST. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> On which list-extensions draft document is your work based on? >>> >>> >>> >>> See this page: >>> http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-ietf-imapext-list-extensions/ >>> for a run-down of the versions. >>> >>> Which server implementations has this been tested on? I'm guessing >>> Cyrus, but which version? >>> >>> >>> > > I tested it on cyrus and I added the innitial list (subscribed) call but > never finished it. Anyway, it works for cyrus (2.2.x) and probably every > cyrus server that advertise the list extension. > > Still need to test the final patch from Michael Long in order to make it > ready for CVS (busy busy busy, as usual). Tomas did most of that testing > work but i do not know the last status of that. Tomas, do you think the > patch from michael is ready for cvs or do you still see issues? I've helped Michael in testing it on courier, dovecot, bincimap and uw. We've checked differences between imap servers, utf7-imap folders, html formated folders and second INBOX folder. I think patch is stable enough. -- Tomas |