From: Kerem E. <ker...@ha...> - 2004-10-19 14:59:16
|
I remember a problem like that. We had 2 2CPU MMPs and 2 4CPU mail stores. One mailstore was for students and the other was for academic staff. When you configured the MMPs as IMAP servers for SM, it took long to get the mail from the IMAP server but if you configured one of the mailstores as IMAP server, the mail came very fast to SM. But that breaks the functionality you know; when you configure one of the mailstores as the IMAP server of SM, the clients of the other mailstore cannot read their mails from SM (that's what MMPs are for right? :-) ) Try configuring your SM with one of your mailstores and compare the speed of SM to the configuration with MMPs. That may give you some point. Cheers, Kerem On 19.Eki.2004, at 17:40, Jesse Thompson wrote: > That's interesting to hear, thanks for your response. > > We are currently using Sun's web client. There are good things and > bad things about it. The things that we don't like about it are > obvious: it's hard to customize or revise to suit our specific needs, > and people around campus generally have the impression that it is a > poor user interface. > > However, because it's proprietary, it is very fast (aside from the > time it takes dial-up users to download all of the javascript). My 3K > message Inbox loads instantly within their interface (running on Sun > 480s), while it takes about 4 seconds in squirrelmail (running on a > Dell 2650 2+ Ghz). SunOne doesn't support the SORT or THREAD > commands, so there is little optimization that I am aware of that > could make a difference. I suppose that I could set up a proxy IMAP > server, but since we're already proxying our mailstores with 4 4CPU > MMPs I don't think that this is where the delays are being incurred. > > Any other advice or anecdotes would we greatly appreciated. > > // jesse > |