Re: [SQLObject] Re: Preparing for 0.6.1

[Ian B. <ia...@co...>]

Brian Beck wrote:
> Starting with version 2.0 (a while ago), SQLite has supported 
> transactions, so maybe the documentation can be updated, and code if 
> necessary?  Doing some timings with insert/update and commit with 
> SQLObject seems to suggest that even though SQLite supports 
> transactions, SQLObject doesn't really take advantage of them.  Is this 
> the case?

The documentation was inaccurate about SQLite and transactions; I've 
removed that from the documentation.

-- 
Ian Bicking  /  ia...@co...  /  http://blog.ianbicking.org