|
From: <sub...@co...> - 2005-12-07 17:55:19
|
Author: ianb Date: 2005-12-07 17:55:09 +0000 (Wed, 07 Dec 2005) New Revision: 1366 Modified: SQLObject/docs/SQLObject.comments.txt Log: Web updates Modified: SQLObject/docs/SQLObject.comments.txt =================================================================== --- SQLObject/docs/SQLObject.comments.txt 2005-12-07 16:29:14 UTC (rev 1365) +++ SQLObject/docs/SQLObject.comments.txt 2005-12-07 17:55:09 UTC (rev 1366) @@ -41,3 +41,12 @@ username: Mike Kent So if you declare a column as an alternateID, unique is implied, and we don't need to explicitly declare it? +==== $(using-the-class) c ++++ c ++ +---------------------------------------- +date: 2005-12-07T10:55:08 +email: web...@co... +id: 6 +ip: 68.104.53.190 +username: Michael Bernstein + +Does this mean that the db schema can't be introspected by other tools to see the constraints? |