[SQL-CVS] r1359 - SQLObject/docs

[<sub...@co...>]

Author: ianb
Date: 2005-12-07 15:52:14 +0000 (Wed, 07 Dec 2005)
New Revision: 1359

Modified:
   SQLObject/docs/SQLObject.comments.txt
Log:
Web updates

Modified: SQLObject/docs/SQLObject.comments.txt
===================================================================
--- SQLObject/docs/SQLObject.comments.txt	2005-12-07 15:46:23 UTC (rev 1358)
+++ SQLObject/docs/SQLObject.comments.txt	2005-12-07 15:52:14 UTC (rev 1359)
@@ -32,3 +32,12 @@
 username: Mike Kent
 
 If I have this correctly: For a one-to-many relationship, you use 'ForeignKey' on the 'has one' side, and you use 'MultipleJoin' on the 'has many' side.  I found this to be incredibly non-intuitive and confusing.  How about 'hasOneOf' and 'hasManyOf'?  Or would this cause a problem with a many-to-many relationship, since both sides would use 'hasManyOf'?
+==== $(col-class-specifying-columns)  c ++ c +++++ c
+----------------------------------------
+date: 2005-12-07T08:52:14
+email: mk...@em...
+id: 5
+ip: 208.255.226.178
+username: Mike Kent
+
+So if you declare a column as an alternateID, unique is implied, and we don't need to explicitly declare it?