|
From: David M. C. <da...@da...> - 2003-04-21 08:03:22
|
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 02:43:00AM -0500, Ian Bicking wrote: > Oh, yes, that explains it. I put in a line to fix that (in CVS), at > least for the case of SQLBuilder consts... maybe the callable() stuff > should be taken out, and you just use a different keyword argument for > dynamic defaults... Time to start checking out from CVS, then! Perhaps the implementation of a __call__ method could be moved down lower in the SQLExpression class hierarchy? Dave |
