Re: [Sqlalchemy-tickets] [sqlalchemy] #1454: Simple relation enhancement, bi-directional one-to-one
Brought to you by:
zzzeek
Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Sqlalchemy-tickets] [sqlalchemy] #1454: Simple relation enhancement, bi-directional one-to-one relationships
|
From: sqlalchemy <mi...@zz...> - 2009-06-26 15:14:57
|
#1454: Simple relation enhancement, bi-directional one-to-one relationships
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: guest | Owner: zzzeek
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: medium | Milestone:
Component: orm | Severity: no triage selected yet
Resolution: | Keywords:
Status_field: awaiting triage |
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Comment (by zzzeek):
well no, because people don't read the documentation. its essentially a
surprise behavior. The logic to determine many-to-one/one-to-many is
quite involved, but if a foreign key is not detected, it fails loudly.
this would be that same logic duplicated (since we need to ensure for
multiple-column constraints, ensure that the join condition is simple,
etc.) and it wouldn't work in many situations, failing silently. Its too
much complexity and inconsistency for not enough benefit.
--
Ticket URL: <http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/1454#comment:3>
sqlalchemy <http://www.sqlalchemy.org/>
The Database Toolkit for Python |