Re: [Spuc-users] pyspuc?

[Matt E. <ma...@et...>]

Tony Kirke wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
> Thanks for your interest in pyspuc and spuc.  Currently pyspuc is not 
> available as open source.
> There was a lot of work involved in creating it and I'm not willing to 
> give it away at this point. As the creator of the SPUC library, I 
> received no contributions or collaboration from the community and so 
> I'd rather either keep pyspuc source code private or sell it. I am 
> willing to provide the package itself on a case by case basis for 
> non-commerical usage, however, I don't currently have the ability to 
> build it on OSX. The build mechanism itself is quite complex and very 
> dependent on boost, python and other things.


Tony,

I fully respect your right to choose the license you wish to use for 
your code, so I won't question that.  However, according to the pyspuc 
web page, "This library also includes code from IT++".  IT++ is licensed 
with the GPL, so I believe you would not be allowed to use that code in 
pyspuc as it is currently licensed.

Matt