|
From: Erwin V. <erw...@er...> - 2005-04-08 17:28:31
|
All, I've been integrating Portlet support into the Spring Web Flow system and today I also added a portlet based version of the PhoneBook sample application. SWF Portlet support builds on the Spring Portlet MVC framework, which brings me to the question: what is the status of Spring Portlet MVC? A recent discussion on the DEV list states that it will be a key feature of Spring 1.3. However, there also seems to be a lot of confusion as to how up-to-date the sources in CVS are (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.springframework.devel/7997) and who is actually working on it/maintaining it. The Wiki page (http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/spring/display/JSR168/Home) also seems to given the impression that's it's not ready for prime-time yet. Since SWF is now dependent on Spring Portlet MVC, we need to make sure it is ready for release in the 1.3 timeframe. Also, since SWF is already releasing preview releases (we have preview 2 coming up this weekend!), we need to make sure the Portlet MVC code we're shipping with that (which is the code from CVS) is actually in up-to-date! Could somebody please try to clarify the Spring Portlet MVC situation a bit? Erwin Vervaet erw...@er... |
|
From: Rainer S. <Rai...@ab...> - 2005-04-11 08:41:12
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Erwin, as fas as I know the CVS still holds Bill's initial code from a few month ago. As you have seen there are some contributions posted to the list or attached to the confluence page. I'm holding back some more contributions until it is clear _where_ to contribute - it doesn't make sence to splatter the code over the mailing lists and wikis. Rainer Erwin Vervaet schrieb: > All, >=20 > I've been integrating Portlet support into the Spring Web Flow system > and today I also added a portlet based version of the PhoneBook sample > application. >=20 > SWF Portlet support builds on the Spring Portlet MVC framework, which > brings me to the question: what is the status of Spring Portlet MVC? A > recent discussion on the DEV list states that it will be a key feature > of Spring 1.3. However, there also seems to be a lot of confusion as to > how up-to-date the sources in CVS are > (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.springframework.devel/7997) > and who is actually working on it/maintaining it. The Wiki page > (http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/spring/display/JSR168/Home) > also seems to given the impression that's it's not ready for prime-time > yet. >=20 > Since SWF is now dependent on Spring Portlet MVC, we need to make sure > it is ready for release in the 1.3 timeframe. Also, since SWF is alread= y > releasing preview releases (we have preview 2 coming up this weekend!), > we need to make sure the Portlet MVC code we're shipping with that > (which is the code from CVS) is actually in up-to-date! >=20 > Could somebody please try to clarify the Spring Portlet MVC situation a > bit? >=20 > Erwin Vervaet > erw...@er... >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >=20 - -- Rainer Schmitz ABAS Software AG (http://www.abas.de) S=FCdendstr. 42 76135 Karlsruhe GERMANY PGP/GPG Id: 0xB03B50E8 Fingerprint: A748 0A57 D4E8 5F1C A136 1A82 C3EC 6C53 B03B 50E8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCWjgHw+xsU7A7UOgRAtcBAJ9Z1zrznUfy0AGSCxuqulwqmhMdcQCeMPHU 1YIxqrhz4wf7vIcGDfcyyFk=3D =3DBULe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: <co...@gm...> - 2005-04-11 15:02:55
|
Hi, It seems the Portlet SWF support and the Portlet MVC support have different evolution paths, as they are being used by different people. One solution could be to extract the minimal common part needed by the Portlet SWF and MVC support (called, for example, the Portlet MVC Core) which is mainly what there is now into the sandbox. This core would be easier to maintain, and the Portlet SWF support could be independent of the Portlet MVC support (and vice versa). Cèsar Ordiñana Navarro co...@di... Rainer Schmitz wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Erwin, > > as fas as I know the CVS still holds Bill's initial code from a few > month ago. > As you have seen there are some contributions posted to the list or > attached to the confluence page. I'm holding back some more > contributions until it is clear _where_ to contribute - it doesn't make > sence to splatter the code over the mailing lists and wikis. > > Rainer > > Erwin Vervaet schrieb: > >>All, >> >>I've been integrating Portlet support into the Spring Web Flow system >>and today I also added a portlet based version of the PhoneBook sample >>application. >> >>SWF Portlet support builds on the Spring Portlet MVC framework, which >>brings me to the question: what is the status of Spring Portlet MVC? A >>recent discussion on the DEV list states that it will be a key feature >>of Spring 1.3. However, there also seems to be a lot of confusion as to >>how up-to-date the sources in CVS are >>(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.springframework.devel/7997) >>and who is actually working on it/maintaining it. The Wiki page >>(http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/spring/display/JSR168/Home) >>also seems to given the impression that's it's not ready for prime-time >>yet. >> >>Since SWF is now dependent on Spring Portlet MVC, we need to make sure >>it is ready for release in the 1.3 timeframe. Also, since SWF is already >>releasing preview releases (we have preview 2 coming up this weekend!), >>we need to make sure the Portlet MVC code we're shipping with that >>(which is the code from CVS) is actually in up-to-date! >> >>Could somebody please try to clarify the Spring Portlet MVC situation a >>bit? >> >>Erwin Vervaet >>erw...@er... |
|
From: John L. <jl...@ar...> - 2005-04-26 21:29:59
|
Sorry for not weighing in on this sooner. I agree that we really need to have a clear path for the portlet framework ASAP. Both Rainer and I have a number of updates and improvements that we need to get merged together and made available as part of the formal code base. Bill Thompson doesn't seem to be actively working on this anymore, so I don't think there is anyone with commit privileges that has this on their radar screen. Juergen, I'm sure you guys are pretty busy working on getting 1.2 released, but I think we really need some action on this soon. I know we had several discussions about whether this should be part of Spring's core or some kind of sub-project. Given that there are project like Web Flow that are dependent on it, that seems to point more towards it going into core. How would you like to proceed on this? John Lewis jl...@ar... Rainer Schmitz wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Erwin, > > as fas as I know the CVS still holds Bill's initial code from a few > month ago. > As you have seen there are some contributions posted to the list or > attached to the confluence page. I'm holding back some more > contributions until it is clear _where_ to contribute - it doesn't make > sence to splatter the code over the mailing lists and wikis. > > Rainer > > Erwin Vervaet schrieb: > >>All, >> >>I've been integrating Portlet support into the Spring Web Flow system >>and today I also added a portlet based version of the PhoneBook sample >>application. >> >>SWF Portlet support builds on the Spring Portlet MVC framework, which >>brings me to the question: what is the status of Spring Portlet MVC? A >>recent discussion on the DEV list states that it will be a key feature >>of Spring 1.3. However, there also seems to be a lot of confusion as to >>how up-to-date the sources in CVS are >>(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.springframework.devel/7997) >>and who is actually working on it/maintaining it. The Wiki page >>(http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/spring/display/JSR168/Home) >>also seems to given the impression that's it's not ready for prime-time >>yet. >> >>Since SWF is now dependent on Spring Portlet MVC, we need to make sure >>it is ready for release in the 1.3 timeframe. Also, since SWF is already >>releasing preview releases (we have preview 2 coming up this weekend!), >>we need to make sure the Portlet MVC code we're shipping with that >>(which is the code from CVS) is actually in up-to-date! >> >>Could somebody please try to clarify the Spring Portlet MVC situation a >>bit? >> >>Erwin Vervaet >>erw...@er... >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >>Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >>_______________________________________________ >>Springframework-developer mailing list >>Spr...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >> > > > - -- > Rainer Schmitz > ABAS Software AG (http://www.abas.de) > Südendstr. 42 > 76135 Karlsruhe > GERMANY > > PGP/GPG Id: 0xB03B50E8 > Fingerprint: A748 0A57 D4E8 5F1C A136 1A82 C3EC 6C53 B03B 50E8 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFCWjgHw+xsU7A7UOgRAtcBAJ9Z1zrznUfy0AGSCxuqulwqmhMdcQCeMPHU > 1YIxqrhz4wf7vIcGDfcyyFk= > =BULe > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click |
|
From: William G. T. Jr. <wg...@ru...> - 2005-04-27 12:22:36
|
I tend to agree with John...unfortunately my current status is not=20 leaving any cycles to devote to PortletMVC. We are running it in=20 production and have a continued interested in it...just don't have=20 anyone at the moment who can lead the effort. Bill John Lewis wrote: > Sorry for not weighing in on this sooner. >=20 > I agree that we really need to have a clear path for the portlet=20 > framework ASAP. Both Rainer and I have a number of updates and=20 > improvements that we need to get merged together and made available as=20 > part of the formal code base. >=20 > Bill Thompson doesn't seem to be actively working on this anymore, so I= =20 > don't think there is anyone with commit privileges that has this on=20 > their radar screen. >=20 > Juergen, I'm sure you guys are pretty busy working on getting 1.2=20 > released, but I think we really need some action on this soon. I know=20 > we had several discussions about whether this should be part of Spring'= s=20 > core or some kind of sub-project. Given that there are project like We= b=20 > Flow that are dependent on it, that seems to point more towards it goin= g=20 > into core. How would you like to proceed on this? >=20 > John Lewis > jl...@ar... >=20 >=20 >=20 > Rainer Schmitz wrote: >=20 >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Erwin, >> >> as fas as I know the CVS still holds Bill's initial code from a few >> month ago. >> As you have seen there are some contributions posted to the list or >> attached to the confluence page. I'm holding back some more >> contributions until it is clear _where_ to contribute - it doesn't mak= e >> sence to splatter the code over the mailing lists and wikis. >> >> Rainer >> >> Erwin Vervaet schrieb: >> >>> All, >>> >>> I've been integrating Portlet support into the Spring Web Flow system >>> and today I also added a portlet based version of the PhoneBook sampl= e >>> application. >>> >>> SWF Portlet support builds on the Spring Portlet MVC framework, which >>> brings me to the question: what is the status of Spring Portlet MVC? = A >>> recent discussion on the DEV list states that it will be a key featur= e >>> of Spring 1.3. However, there also seems to be a lot of confusion as = to >>> how up-to-date the sources in CVS are >>> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.springframework.devel/7997) >>> and who is actually working on it/maintaining it. The Wiki page >>> (http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/spring/display/JSR168/Hom= e) >>> also seems to given the impression that's it's not ready for prime-ti= me >>> yet. >>> >>> Since SWF is now dependent on Spring Portlet MVC, we need to make sur= e >>> it is ready for release in the 1.3 timeframe. Also, since SWF is alre= ady >>> releasing preview releases (we have preview 2 coming up this weekend!= ), >>> we need to make sure the Portlet MVC code we're shipping with that >>> (which is the code from CVS) is actually in up-to-date! >>> >>> Could somebody please try to clarify the Spring Portlet MVC situation= a >>> bit? >>> >>> Erwin Vervaet >>> erw...@er... >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real use= rs. >>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Springframework-developer mailing list >>> Spr...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-develope= r >>> >> >> >> - -- >> Rainer Schmitz >> ABAS Software AG (http://www.abas.de) >> S=FCdendstr. 42 >> 76135 Karlsruhe >> GERMANY >> |
|
From: J.Enrique R. <er...@di...> - 2005-04-28 08:50:08
|
Given that Spring Web Flow includes the support for the Portlet framework and it will be included in Spring core, we believe a good way could be to create a Spring Module for Portlet MVC. This module would contain all about Portlets, including Spring Webflow Portlet support. Juergen, Keith, Erwin et al what do you think? > I tend to agree with John...unfortunately my current status is not > leaving any cycles to devote to PortletMVC. We are running it in > production and have a continued interested in it...just don't have > anyone at the moment who can lead the effort. > > Bill > > John Lewis wrote: > >> Sorry for not weighing in on this sooner. >> >> I agree that we really need to have a clear path for the portlet >> framework ASAP. Both Rainer and I have a number of updates and >> improvements that we need to get merged together and made available >> as part of the formal code base. >> >> Bill Thompson doesn't seem to be actively working on this anymore, so >> I don't think there is anyone with commit privileges that has this on >> their radar screen. >> >> Juergen, I'm sure you guys are pretty busy working on getting 1.2 >> released, but I think we really need some action on this soon. I >> know we had several discussions about whether this should be part of >> Spring's core or some kind of sub-project. Given that there are >> project like Web Flow that are dependent on it, that seems to point >> more towards it going into core. How would you like to proceed on this? >> >> John Lewis >> jl...@ar... >> >> >> >> Rainer Schmitz wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Erwin, >>> >>> as fas as I know the CVS still holds Bill's initial code from a few >>> month ago. >>> As you have seen there are some contributions posted to the list or >>> attached to the confluence page. I'm holding back some more >>> contributions until it is clear _where_ to contribute - it doesn't make >>> sence to splatter the code over the mailing lists and wikis. >>> >>> Rainer >>> >>> Erwin Vervaet schrieb: >>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> I've been integrating Portlet support into the Spring Web Flow system >>>> and today I also added a portlet based version of the PhoneBook sample >>>> application. >>>> >>>> SWF Portlet support builds on the Spring Portlet MVC framework, which >>>> brings me to the question: what is the status of Spring Portlet MVC? A >>>> recent discussion on the DEV list states that it will be a key feature >>>> of Spring 1.3. However, there also seems to be a lot of confusion >>>> as to >>>> how up-to-date the sources in CVS are >>>> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.springframework.devel/7997) >>>> and who is actually working on it/maintaining it. The Wiki page >>>> (http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/spring/display/JSR168/Home) >>>> >>>> also seems to given the impression that's it's not ready for >>>> prime-time >>>> yet. >>>> >>>> Since SWF is now dependent on Spring Portlet MVC, we need to make sure >>>> it is ready for release in the 1.3 timeframe. Also, since SWF is >>>> already >>>> releasing preview releases (we have preview 2 coming up this >>>> weekend!), >>>> we need to make sure the Portlet MVC code we're shipping with that >>>> (which is the code from CVS) is actually in up-to-date! >>>> >>>> Could somebody please try to clarify the Spring Portlet MVC >>>> situation a >>>> bit? >>>> >>>> Erwin Vervaet >>>> erw...@er... >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> -- J.Enrique Ruiz CIO - DiSiD S.L.L. (http://www.disid.com) Email: er...@di... |