|
From: John L. <jl...@ar...> - 2005-04-26 21:29:59
|
Sorry for not weighing in on this sooner. I agree that we really need to have a clear path for the portlet framework ASAP. Both Rainer and I have a number of updates and improvements that we need to get merged together and made available as part of the formal code base. Bill Thompson doesn't seem to be actively working on this anymore, so I don't think there is anyone with commit privileges that has this on their radar screen. Juergen, I'm sure you guys are pretty busy working on getting 1.2 released, but I think we really need some action on this soon. I know we had several discussions about whether this should be part of Spring's core or some kind of sub-project. Given that there are project like Web Flow that are dependent on it, that seems to point more towards it going into core. How would you like to proceed on this? John Lewis jl...@ar... Rainer Schmitz wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Erwin, > > as fas as I know the CVS still holds Bill's initial code from a few > month ago. > As you have seen there are some contributions posted to the list or > attached to the confluence page. I'm holding back some more > contributions until it is clear _where_ to contribute - it doesn't make > sence to splatter the code over the mailing lists and wikis. > > Rainer > > Erwin Vervaet schrieb: > >>All, >> >>I've been integrating Portlet support into the Spring Web Flow system >>and today I also added a portlet based version of the PhoneBook sample >>application. >> >>SWF Portlet support builds on the Spring Portlet MVC framework, which >>brings me to the question: what is the status of Spring Portlet MVC? A >>recent discussion on the DEV list states that it will be a key feature >>of Spring 1.3. However, there also seems to be a lot of confusion as to >>how up-to-date the sources in CVS are >>(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.springframework.devel/7997) >>and who is actually working on it/maintaining it. The Wiki page >>(http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/spring/display/JSR168/Home) >>also seems to given the impression that's it's not ready for prime-time >>yet. >> >>Since SWF is now dependent on Spring Portlet MVC, we need to make sure >>it is ready for release in the 1.3 timeframe. Also, since SWF is already >>releasing preview releases (we have preview 2 coming up this weekend!), >>we need to make sure the Portlet MVC code we're shipping with that >>(which is the code from CVS) is actually in up-to-date! >> >>Could somebody please try to clarify the Spring Portlet MVC situation a >>bit? >> >>Erwin Vervaet >>erw...@er... >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >>Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >>_______________________________________________ >>Springframework-developer mailing list >>Spr...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >> > > > - -- > Rainer Schmitz > ABAS Software AG (http://www.abas.de) > Südendstr. 42 > 76135 Karlsruhe > GERMANY > > PGP/GPG Id: 0xB03B50E8 > Fingerprint: A748 0A57 D4E8 5F1C A136 1A82 C3EC 6C53 B03B 50E8 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFCWjgHw+xsU7A7UOgRAtcBAJ9Z1zrznUfy0AGSCxuqulwqmhMdcQCeMPHU > 1YIxqrhz4wf7vIcGDfcyyFk= > =BULe > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click |