|
From: Alef A. <al...@jt...> - 2005-03-30 22:03:57
|
You're right, but I'll be adding support for running the unit tests on = 1.4 as well... I was first thinking about adding a simple master build = script that executes the two builds (1.4 and 1.5) but the problem here = is that the 'ant' task does not support forking of a new JVM and doing = an 'exec' is not an option, since I want to preserve the log files. = JUnit does support the fork (we're already doing it) and you can also = specify a JVM to use. About building (compiling), I thought the behavior when building on 1.5 = in combination with adding the compatibility flag would be the same as = with building on 1.4, wouldn't it? Alef -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... on behalf of = Juergen Hoeller Sent: Wed 3/30/2005 8:15 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run = autobuilds build on 1.5 as well =20 Well, I don't object to such a property in general. But such a property = only makes sense if you intend to build the 1.4 version on JDK 1.5: I don't = think there's much point in that; building the 1.5 version only would be sufficient then. The capability of our build script to build on 1.4 is really just meant = as a fallback for users that want to do custom builds on their 1.4 JDK. The = only value we could add to the auto-builds is to check that building the 1.4 version actually works *on JDK 1.4*, which we can't check by building on = JDK 1.5... Juergen -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf = Of Alef Arendsen Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:32 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run autobuilds build on 1.5 as well If nobody objects, I'll be modifying the build file to include an = extra property that indicates whether or not you want to build on 1.5. I want = to have the autobuild build for both 1.5 and 1.4 but I can't get this to = work while maintaining the build numbers. To in addition to detecting the = Java version automatically, there will be a property you can specify when = issuing an Ant command. regards, Alef |
|
From: Alef A. <al...@jt...> - 2005-03-31 16:39:06
|
Anybody else having experiencing major delays with the mailinglist??? ________________________________ From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf Of Alef Arendsen Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 5:46 PM To: spr...@li...; spr...@li... Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run autobuilds build on 1.5 as well You're right, but I'll be adding support for running the unit tests on 1.4 as well... I was first thinking about adding a simple master build script that executes the two builds (1.4 and 1.5) but the problem here is that the 'ant' task does not support forking of a new JVM and doing an 'exec' is not an option, since I want to preserve the log files. JUnit does support the fork (we're already doing it) and you can also specify a JVM to use. About building (compiling), I thought the behavior when building on 1.5 in combination with adding the compatibility flag would be the same as with building on 1.4, wouldn't it? Alef -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... on behalf of Juergen Hoeller Sent: Wed 3/30/2005 8:15 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run autobuilds build on 1.5 as well Well, I don't object to such a property in general. But such a property only makes sense if you intend to build the 1.4 version on JDK 1.5: I don't think there's much point in that; building the 1.5 version only would be sufficient then. The capability of our build script to build on 1.4 is really just meant as a fallback for users that want to do custom builds on their 1.4 JDK. The only value we could add to the auto-builds is to check that building the 1.4 version actually works *on JDK 1.4*, which we can't check by building on JDK 1.5... Juergen -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of Alef Arendsen Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:32 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run autobuilds build on 1.5 as well If nobody objects, I'll be modifying the build file to include an extra property that indicates whether or not you want to build on 1.5. I want to have the autobuild build for both 1.5 and 1.4 but I can't get this to work while maintaining the build numbers. To in addition to detecting the Java version automatically, there will be a property you can specify when issuing an Ant command. regards, Alef |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2005-04-02 16:09:17
|
I am. It seems fairly random too, i.e. last night I sent an email to the user list and cc'ed the dev list, and it showed up on one list immediately, but only this morning on the other. Alef Arendsen wrote: > Anybody else having experiencing major delays with the mailinglist??? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* spr...@li... > [mailto:spr...@li...] *On > Behalf Of *Alef Arendsen > *Sent:* Thursday, March 31, 2005 5:46 PM > *To:* spr...@li...; > spr...@li... > *Subject:* RE: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run > autobuilds build on 1.5 as well > > You're right, but I'll be adding support for running the unit tests on > 1.4 as well... I was first thinking about adding a simple master build > script that executes the two builds (1.4 and 1.5) but the problem here > is that the 'ant' task does not support forking of a new JVM and doing > an 'exec' is not an option, since I want to preserve the log files. > JUnit does support the fork (we're already doing it) and you can also > specify a JVM to use. > > About building (compiling), I thought the behavior when building on > 1.5 in combination with adding the compatibility flag would be the > same as with building on 1.4, wouldn't it? > > Alef > > > -----Original Message----- > From: spr...@li... on behalf > of Juergen Hoeller > Sent: Wed 3/30/2005 8:15 PM > To: spr...@li... > Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run > autobuilds build on 1.5 as well > > Well, I don't object to such a property in general. But such a > property only > makes sense if you intend to build the 1.4 version on JDK 1.5: I don't > think > there's much point in that; building the 1.5 version only would be > sufficient then. > > The capability of our build script to build on 1.4 is really just > meant as a > fallback for users that want to do custom builds on their 1.4 JDK. The > only > value we could add to the auto-builds is to check that building the 1.4 > version actually works *on JDK 1.4*, which we can't check by building > on JDK > 1.5... > > Juergen > > > -----Original Message----- > From: spr...@li... > [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of > Alef Arendsen > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:32 PM > To: spr...@li... > Subject: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run > autobuilds build on 1.5 as well > > > If nobody objects, I'll be modifying the build file to include an extra > property that indicates whether or not you want to build on 1.5. I want to > have the autobuild build for both 1.5 and 1.4 but I can't get this to work > while maintaining the build numbers. To in addition to detecting the Java > version automatically, there will be a property you can specify when > issuing > an Ant command. > > regards, > Alef > |
|
From: Rob H. <rob...@in...> - 2005-03-31 16:54:00
|
Yeah - but only one of my addresses :-) _____ From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf Of Alef Arendsen Sent: 31 March 2005 17:39 To: spr...@li... Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run autobuilds build on 1.5 as well Anybody else having experiencing major delays with the mailinglist??? _____ From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf Of Alef Arendsen Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 5:46 PM To: spr...@li...; spr...@li... Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run autobuilds build on 1.5 as well You're right, but I'll be adding support for running the unit tests on 1.4 as well... I was first thinking about adding a simple master build script that executes the two builds (1.4 and 1.5) but the problem here is that the 'ant' task does not support forking of a new JVM and doing an 'exec' is not an option, since I want to preserve the log files. JUnit does support the fork (we're already doing it) and you can also specify a JVM to use. About building (compiling), I thought the behavior when building on 1.5 in combination with adding the compatibility flag would be the same as with building on 1.4, wouldn't it? Alef -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... on behalf of Juergen Hoeller Sent: Wed 3/30/2005 8:15 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run autobuilds build on 1.5 as well Well, I don't object to such a property in general. But such a property only makes sense if you intend to build the 1.4 version on JDK 1.5: I don't think there's much point in that; building the 1.5 version only would be sufficient then. The capability of our build script to build on 1.4 is really just meant as a fallback for users that want to do custom builds on their 1.4 JDK. The only value we could add to the auto-builds is to check that building the 1.4 version actually works *on JDK 1.4*, which we can't check by building on JDK 1.5... Juergen -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of Alef Arendsen Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:32 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run autobuilds build on 1.5 as well If nobody objects, I'll be modifying the build file to include an extra property that indicates whether or not you want to build on 1.5. I want to have the autobuild build for both 1.5 and 1.4 but I can't get this to work while maintaining the build numbers. To in addition to detecting the Java version automatically, there will be a property you can specify when issuing an Ant command. regards, Alef |
|
From: Alef A. <al...@jt...> - 2005-03-31 21:49:26
|
Ok, got it! I'll add the 1.4 building as a separate build then (as I said before,=20 can't do it in one run because of cruisecontrol limitations). rgds, alef On Mar 31, 2005, at 7:30 PM, Juergen Hoeller wrote: > AFAIK, when building on JDK 1.5, you're always compiling agains the=20 > 1.5 version of the standard libraries. We would get most value out of=20= > an auto-build on 1.4 that actually compiles against the 1.4 libraries,=20= > to make sure that we didn't accentally use 1.5-only methods somewhere. > =A0 > I do compile on 1.4 before each release anyway, to check that=20 > everything relevant still compiles there. Having this in the=20 > auto-builds would allow us to catch any issues earlier, though. > =A0 > Juergen > =A0 > =A0 > -----Original Message----- > From: spr...@li...=20 > [mailto:spr...@li...]On=20 > Behalf Of Alef Arendsen > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 12:03 AM > To: spr...@li...;=20 > spr...@li... > Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run=20= > autobuilds build on 1.5 as well > > > You're right, but I'll be adding support for running the unit tests on=20= > 1.4 as well... I was first thinking about adding a simple master build=20= > script that executes the two builds (1.4 and 1.5) but the problem here=20= > is that the 'ant' task does not support forking of a new JVM and doing=20= > an 'exec' is not an option, since I want to preserve the log files.=20 > JUnit does support the fork (we're already doing it) and you can also=20= > specify a JVM to use. > > About building (compiling), I thought the behavior when building on=20 > 1.5 in combination with adding the compatibility flag would be the=20 > same as with building on 1.4, wouldn't it? > > Alef > > > -----Original Message----- > From: spr...@li... on behalf=20= > of Juergen Hoeller > Sent: Wed 3/30/2005 8:15 PM > To: spr...@li... > Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run=20= > autobuilds build on 1.5 as well > > Well, I don't object to such a property in general. But such a=20 > property only > makes sense if you intend to build the 1.4 version on JDK 1.5: I don't=20= > think > there's much point in that; building the 1.5 version only would be > sufficient then. > > The capability of our build script to build on 1.4 is really just=20 > meant as a > fallback for users that want to do custom builds on their 1.4 JDK. The=20= > only > value we could add to the auto-builds is to check that building the = 1.4 > version actually works *on JDK 1.4*, which we can't check by building=20= > on JDK > 1.5... > > Juergen > > > =A0 -----Original Message----- > =A0 From: spr...@li... > [mailto:spr...@li...]On=20 > Behalf Of > Alef Arendsen > =A0 Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:32 PM > =A0 To: spr...@li... > =A0 Subject: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run > autobuilds build on 1.5 as well > > > =A0 If nobody objects, I'll be modifying the build file to include an=20= > extra > property that indicates whether or not you want to build on 1.5. I=20 > want to > have the autobuild build for both 1.5 and 1.4 but I can't get this to=20= > work > while maintaining the build numbers. To in addition to detecting the=20= > Java > version automatically, there will be a property you can specify when=20= > issuing > an Ant command. > > =A0 regards, > =A0 Alef > |
|
From: Juergen H. <ju...@in...> - 2005-03-31 17:19:20
|
RE: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run autobuilds build
on 1.5 as wellAFAIK, when building on JDK 1.5, you're always compiling
agains the 1.5 version of the standard libraries. We would get most value
out of an auto-build on 1.4 that actually compiles against the 1.4
libraries, to make sure that we didn't accentally use 1.5-only methods
somewhere.
I do compile on 1.4 before each release anyway, to check that everything
relevant still compiles there. Having this in the auto-builds would allow us
to catch any issues earlier, though.
Juergen
-----Original Message-----
From: spr...@li...
[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of
Alef Arendsen
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 12:03 AM
To: spr...@li...;
spr...@li...
Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run
autobuilds build on 1.5 as well
You're right, but I'll be adding support for running the unit tests on 1.4
as well... I was first thinking about adding a simple master build script
that executes the two builds (1.4 and 1.5) but the problem here is that the
'ant' task does not support forking of a new JVM and doing an 'exec' is not
an option, since I want to preserve the log files. JUnit does support the
fork (we're already doing it) and you can also specify a JVM to use.
About building (compiling), I thought the behavior when building on 1.5 in
combination with adding the compatibility flag would be the same as with
building on 1.4, wouldn't it?
Alef
-----Original Message-----
From: spr...@li... on behalf of
Juergen Hoeller
Sent: Wed 3/30/2005 8:15 PM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run
autobuilds build on 1.5 as well
Well, I don't object to such a property in general. But such a property
only
makes sense if you intend to build the 1.4 version on JDK 1.5: I don't
think
there's much point in that; building the 1.5 version only would be
sufficient then.
The capability of our build script to build on 1.4 is really just meant as
a
fallback for users that want to do custom builds on their 1.4 JDK. The
only
value we could add to the auto-builds is to check that building the 1.4
version actually works *on JDK 1.4*, which we can't check by building on
JDK
1.5...
Juergen
-----Original Message-----
From: spr...@li...
[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of
Alef Arendsen
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:32 PM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: [Springframework-developer] Changes to build.xml to run
autobuilds build on 1.5 as well
If nobody objects, I'll be modifying the build file to include an extra
property that indicates whether or not you want to build on 1.5. I want to
have the autobuild build for both 1.5 and 1.4 but I can't get this to work
while maintaining the build numbers. To in addition to detecting the Java
version automatically, there will be a property you can specify when
issuing
an Ant command.
regards,
Alef
|