Menu
▾
▴
springframework-developer
|
From: Artur K. <kar...@as...> - 2005-02-09 19:03:43
|
All, I read discussion about support for Hibernate3 (HB3 for short) last few weeks, here, on dev list. I totally agree that we can wait for official support of HB3 in spring till 1.2-rc versions. I wonder, though, if it is possible to import 'preliminary' support for HB3 into sandbox tree. Since I created JIRA (http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SPR-300) regarding HB3 support and did some work integrating HB alpha release and spring I got *a lot* of feedback. I thing people are more and more interested in support for HB3 in spring, even in sandbox. Currently there are few versions of patches available in SPR-300 - and it becomes harder and harder to maintain it. It would be nice to add support for HB3 beta in sandbox, so people could just checkout it from CVS compile and use, and it would be much easier to keep it in sync with rest of springframework. What about that? HB3 stable will be released in 2 weeks (HB3 developers plan to release official stable HB3 release on JBoss World, March 1 AFAIK). regards, Artur Karazniewicz |
|
From: Dmitriy K. <dko...@ru...> - 2005-02-09 19:16:47
|
+1 for H3 support in sandbox sooner rather then later :-) Regards, Dmitriy. Artur Karazniewicz wrote: >All, > >I read discussion about support for Hibernate3 (HB3 for short) last few >weeks, here, on dev list. I totally agree that we can wait for official >support of HB3 in spring till 1.2-rc versions. I wonder, though, if it is >possible to import 'preliminary' support for HB3 into sandbox tree. Since I >created JIRA >(http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SPR-300) regarding >HB3 support and did some work integrating HB alpha release and spring I got >*a lot* of feedback. I thing people are more and more interested in support >for HB3 in spring, even in sandbox. Currently there are few versions of >patches available in SPR-300 - and it becomes harder and harder to maintain >it. It would be nice to add support for HB3 beta in sandbox, so people >could just checkout it from CVS compile and use, and it would be much >easier to keep it in sync with rest of springframework. What about that? >HB3 stable will be released in 2 weeks (HB3 developers plan to release >official stable HB3 release on JBoss World, March 1 AFAIK). > >regards, >Artur Karazniewicz > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >_______________________________________________ >Springframework-developer mailing list >Spr...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > |
|
From: Rod J. <ro...@in...> - 2005-02-17 22:31:53
|
+1 Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: > +1 for H3 support in sandbox sooner rather then later :-) > > Regards, > Dmitriy. > > Artur Karazniewicz wrote: > >> All, >> >> I read discussion about support for Hibernate3 (HB3 for short) last few >> weeks, here, on dev list. I totally agree that we can wait for official >> support of HB3 in spring till 1.2-rc versions. I wonder, though, if it is >> possible to import 'preliminary' support for HB3 into sandbox tree. >> Since I >> created JIRA >> (http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SPR-300) >> regarding >> HB3 support and did some work integrating HB alpha release and spring >> I got >> *a lot* of feedback. I thing people are more and more interested in >> support >> for HB3 in spring, even in sandbox. Currently there are few versions of >> patches available in SPR-300 - and it becomes harder and harder to >> maintain >> it. It would be nice to add support for HB3 beta in sandbox, so people >> could just checkout it from CVS compile and use, and it would be much >> easier to keep it in sync with rest of springframework. What about >> that? HB3 stable will be released in 2 weeks (HB3 developers plan to >> release >> official stable HB3 release on JBoss World, March 1 AFAIK). >> >> regards, >> Artur Karazniewicz >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> Springframework-developer mailing list >> Spr...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > -- ____________________________________________________ Rod Johnson Interface21 - Spring Services from the Source http://www.springframework.com Founder, Spring Framework: http://www.springframework.org Author, "Expert One-on-One J2EE Development Without EJB" (May 2004, with Juergen Hoeller). http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0764558315/ Author, "Expert One-on-One J2EE Design and Development" (October 2002). http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0764543857/ ____________________________________________________ Interface21 Limited Registered Office Summit House, 2-2a Highfield Road, Dartford, Kent DA1 2JY Registered in England and Wales No. 5187766 ____________________________________________________ |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2005-02-17 22:39:41
|
+1. My only concern with using the patch in JIRA vs. making a new tree of code based on existing one is if the patch has really been kept up to date properly. There have been a pretty large number of Hibernate code changes/fixes since then. It seems a shame to throw away that work, but on the other hand it might be safer to start from scratch... Colin Rod Johnson wrote: > +1 > > Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: > >> +1 for H3 support in sandbox sooner rather then later :-) >> >> Regards, >> Dmitriy. >> >> Artur Karazniewicz wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> I read discussion about support for Hibernate3 (HB3 for short) last few >>> weeks, here, on dev list. I totally agree that we can wait for official >>> support of HB3 in spring till 1.2-rc versions. I wonder, though, if >>> it is >>> possible to import 'preliminary' support for HB3 into sandbox tree. >>> Since I >>> created JIRA >>> (http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SPR-300) >>> regarding >>> HB3 support and did some work integrating HB alpha release and >>> spring I got >>> *a lot* of feedback. I thing people are more and more interested in >>> support >>> for HB3 in spring, even in sandbox. Currently there are few versions of >>> patches available in SPR-300 - and it becomes harder and harder to >>> maintain >>> it. It would be nice to add support for HB3 beta in sandbox, so people >>> could just checkout it from CVS compile and use, and it would be much >>> easier to keep it in sync with rest of springframework. What about >>> that? HB3 stable will be released in 2 weeks (HB3 developers plan to >>> release >>> official stable HB3 release on JBoss World, March 1 AFAIK). >>> >>> regards, >>> Artur Karazniewicz >> |
|
From: Thomas R. <tho...@tr...> - 2005-02-18 02:07:21
|
+1 I'm about to start a new project and I wouldn't mind using HB3 for it. That will give me an opportunity to test the new support too. I think Colin has a good point - it would be better to start with the current codebase. We could then compare the new classes with the ones in the patch. That way we could port any changes that need to be made without having to worry about changes made since the patch was created. Thomas Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > +1. > > My only concern with using the patch in JIRA vs. making a new tree of > code based on existing one is if the patch has really been kept up to > date properly. There have been a pretty large number of Hibernate code > changes/fixes since then. It seems a shame to throw away that work, > but on the other hand it might be safer to start from scratch... > > Colin > > Rod Johnson wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >> >>> +1 for H3 support in sandbox sooner rather then later :-) >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dmitriy. >>> >>> Artur Karazniewicz wrote: >>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> I read discussion about support for Hibernate3 (HB3 for short) last >>>> few >>>> weeks, here, on dev list. I totally agree that we can wait for >>>> official >>>> support of HB3 in spring till 1.2-rc versions. I wonder, though, if >>>> it is >>>> possible to import 'preliminary' support for HB3 into sandbox tree. >>>> Since I >>>> created JIRA >>>> (http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SPR-300) >>>> regarding >>>> HB3 support and did some work integrating HB alpha release and >>>> spring I got >>>> *a lot* of feedback. I thing people are more and more interested in >>>> support >>>> for HB3 in spring, even in sandbox. Currently there are few >>>> versions of >>>> patches available in SPR-300 - and it becomes harder and harder to >>>> maintain >>>> it. It would be nice to add support for HB3 beta in sandbox, so >>>> people >>>> could just checkout it from CVS compile and use, and it would be much >>>> easier to keep it in sync with rest of springframework. What about >>>> that? HB3 stable will be released in 2 weeks (HB3 developers plan >>>> to release >>>> official stable HB3 release on JBoss World, March 1 AFAIK). >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> Artur Karazniewicz >>> >>> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > |
|
From: Artur K. <kar...@as...> - 2005-02-18 18:27:44
|
Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > +1. > > My only concern with using the patch in JIRA vs. making a new tree of > code based on existing one is if the patch has really been kept up to > date properly. There have been a pretty large number of Hibernate code > changes/fixes since then. It seems a shame to throw away that work, but > on the other hand it might be safer to start from scratch... I did the first patch and know that there were a lot of changes in classic hibernate support in spring since then (both in implementation and test suite). It would be much better to make fresh copy of hibernate into sandbox tree and refactor it. It took me two evnings using Elipse to prepare patch included in SPR-300 JIRA, to be honest most of time I spent learning MockObjects :)). Artur -- ,,Wine, jako emulator Windows...'' -- WO, pcoa ,,As Wine's name says: "Wine Is Not an Emulator"'' -- WineHQ, FAQ |
|
From: Juergen H. <ju...@in...> - 2005-02-21 11:01:55
|
As I said before, I intend to create a fresh port of the current Hibernate 2.1 support, adapting Hibernate API calls where necessary. There've been many refinements in the details in the Spring 1.1.x branch, and I wouldn't want to lose any of those in the Hibernate support. Ideally, we should release 1.1.5 ASAP: I'd like to stick with this Sunday, as a hard deadline. I would then immediately go for adding the Hibernate3 support to the main sources, with a first snapshot probably available by Monday evening. Unfortunately, I'm quite constrained in my time this week, so I'll hardly find time to put Hibernate3 support into the sandbox earlier than that. I'll rather use my time to address any remaining issues for Spring 1.1.5. Juergen -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of Artur Karazniewicz Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 7:27 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: [Springframework-developer] Re: Hibernate3 in sandbox Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > +1. > > My only concern with using the patch in JIRA vs. making a new tree of > code based on existing one is if the patch has really been kept up to > date properly. There have been a pretty large number of Hibernate code > changes/fixes since then. It seems a shame to throw away that work, but > on the other hand it might be safer to start from scratch... I did the first patch and know that there were a lot of changes in classic hibernate support in spring since then (both in implementation and test suite). It would be much better to make fresh copy of hibernate into sandbox tree and refactor it. It took me two evnings using Elipse to prepare patch included in SPR-300 JIRA, to be honest most of time I spent learning MockObjects :)). Artur -- ,,Wine, jako emulator Windows...'' -- WO, pcoa ,,As Wine's name says: "Wine Is Not an Emulator"'' -- WineHQ, FAQ ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Artur K. <kar...@as...> - 2005-02-09 19:24:09
|
Artur Karazniewicz wrote: > got *a lot* of feedback. I thing people are more and more interested in > support for HB3 in spring, even in sandbox. Currently there are few Eeekss s/thing/think/g ;). Artur |
