Menu
▾
▴
springframework-developer
|
From: Michael S. <mi...@sc...> - 2005-01-19 20:10:34
|
Most people in here probably have already read the news [*]. AspectJ and AspectWerkz are merging. My understanding is that they intend to frontends, AJ-style language-based and AW-style annotation-based, to an enhanced common backend. Now, this might be a delicate issue, but I'll put it bluntly nevertheless: Would there be a point in further consolidation with Spring AOP? Spring already supports AspectJ besides its own AOP variant; Spring and AspectWerkz already have aopalliance interfaces in common. Michael [*] http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=31244 http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextech.cgi/~checkout~/aspectj-home/aj5announce.html -- Michael Schuerig The more it stays the same, mailto:mi...@sc... The less it changes! http://www.schuerig.de/michael/ --Spinal Tap, The Majesty of Rock |
|
From: Eugene K. <eu...@pl...> - 2005-01-19 20:23:13
|
Michael, As far as I know, AspectWerkz is not using aopalliance interfaces, but you should be able to use AW as AOP container for Spring already. regards, Eugene > Most people in here probably have already read the news [*]. AspectJ and > AspectWerkz are merging. My understanding is that they intend to > frontends, AJ-style language-based and AW-style annotation-based, to an > enhanced common backend. > > Now, this might be a delicate issue, but I'll put it bluntly > nevertheless: Would there be a point in further consolidation with > Spring AOP? Spring already supports AspectJ besides its own AOP > variant; Spring and AspectWerkz already have aopalliance interfaces in > common. > > Michael > > > [*] > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=31244 > http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextech.cgi/~checkout~/aspectj-home/aj5announce.html > |
|
From: Rob H. <ro...@ca...> - 2005-01-19 20:33:29
|
Eugene, AW provides support for executing any advice that uses the AOP Alliance interfaces. You are correct in saying that we should be able to use AW internally within Spring. Rob Eugene Kuleshov wrote: > Michael, > > As far as I know, AspectWerkz is not using aopalliance interfaces, > but you should be able to use AW as AOP container for Spring already. > > regards, > Eugene > > >> Most people in here probably have already read the news [*]. AspectJ >> and AspectWerkz are merging. My understanding is that they intend to >> frontends, AJ-style language-based and AW-style annotation-based, to >> an enhanced common backend. >> >> Now, this might be a delicate issue, but I'll put it bluntly >> nevertheless: Would there be a point in further consolidation with >> Spring AOP? Spring already supports AspectJ besides its own AOP >> variant; Spring and AspectWerkz already have aopalliance interfaces >> in common. >> >> Michael >> >> >> [*] >> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=31244 >> http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextech.cgi/~checkout~/aspectj-home/aj5announce.html >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting > Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. > Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > |
|
From: Eugene K. <eu...@pl...> - 2005-01-19 21:06:09
|
Rob, > AW provides support for executing any advice that uses the AOP Alliance > interfaces. You are correct in saying that we should be able to use AW > internally within Spring. It should be easy to implement some generic AW-based wrapper for aopalliance interfaces, but I wonder if you can send me a link to an existing one. Thank you. Eugene > Rob > > Eugene Kuleshov wrote: > >> Michael, >> >> As far as I know, AspectWerkz is not using aopalliance interfaces, >> but you should be able to use AW as AOP container for Spring already. >> >> regards, >> Eugene >> >> >>> Most people in here probably have already read the news [*]. AspectJ >>> and AspectWerkz are merging. My understanding is that they intend to >>> frontends, AJ-style language-based and AW-style annotation-based, to >>> an enhanced common backend. >>> >>> Now, this might be a delicate issue, but I'll put it bluntly >>> nevertheless: Would there be a point in further consolidation with >>> Spring AOP? Spring already supports AspectJ besides its own AOP >>> variant; Spring and AspectWerkz already have aopalliance interfaces >>> in common. >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> >>> [*] >>> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=31244 >>> http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextech.cgi/~checkout~/aspectj-home/aj5announce.html >>> >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting >> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time >> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. >> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl >> _______________________________________________ >> Springframework-developer mailing list >> Spr...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting > Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. > Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Rob H. <ro...@ca...> - 2005-01-19 21:13:43
|
Eugene, If I remember correctly, the support for AOP Alliance interfaces is included with the 2.0 distribution of AW. Check out the article on this subject at http://www.theserverside.com/articles/article.tss?l=AspectWerkzP1 Rob Eugene Kuleshov wrote: > Rob, > >> AW provides support for executing any advice that uses the AOP >> Alliance interfaces. You are correct in saying that we should be able >> to use AW internally within Spring. > > > It should be easy to implement some generic AW-based wrapper for > aopalliance interfaces, but I wonder if you can send me a link to an > existing one. > > Thank you. > > Eugene > > >> Rob >> >> Eugene Kuleshov wrote: >> >>> Michael, >>> >>> As far as I know, AspectWerkz is not using aopalliance interfaces, >>> but you should be able to use AW as AOP container for Spring already. >>> >>> regards, >>> Eugene >>> >>> >>>> Most people in here probably have already read the news [*]. >>>> AspectJ and AspectWerkz are merging. My understanding is that they >>>> intend to frontends, AJ-style language-based and AW-style >>>> annotation-based, to an enhanced common backend. >>>> >>>> Now, this might be a delicate issue, but I'll put it bluntly >>>> nevertheless: Would there be a point in further consolidation with >>>> Spring AOP? Spring already supports AspectJ besides its own AOP >>>> variant; Spring and AspectWerkz already have aopalliance interfaces >>>> in common. >>>> >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> >>>> [*] >>>> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=31244 >>>> http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextech.cgi/~checkout~/aspectj-home/aj5announce.html >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting >>> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time >>> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. >>> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Springframework-developer mailing list >>> Spr...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting >> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time >> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. >> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl >> _______________________________________________ >> Springframework-developer mailing list >> Spr...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting > Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. > Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > |
|
From: Eugene K. <eu...@pl...> - 2005-01-19 21:24:56
|
Rob Harrop wrote: You are right. It is in compiler extensions. Sorry for confusion. regards, Eugene > If I remember correctly, the support for AOP Alliance interfaces is > included with the 2.0 distribution of AW. Check out the article on this > subject at > http://www.theserverside.com/articles/article.tss?l=AspectWerkzP1 > > Rob > > Eugene Kuleshov wrote: > >> Rob, >> >>> AW provides support for executing any advice that uses the AOP >>> Alliance interfaces. You are correct in saying that we should be able >>> to use AW internally within Spring. >> >> >> >> It should be easy to implement some generic AW-based wrapper for >> aopalliance interfaces, but I wonder if you can send me a link to an >> existing one. >> >> Thank you. >> >> Eugene >> >> >>> Rob >>> >>> Eugene Kuleshov wrote: >>> >>>> Michael, >>>> >>>> As far as I know, AspectWerkz is not using aopalliance interfaces, >>>> but you should be able to use AW as AOP container for Spring already. >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> Eugene >>>> >>>> >>>>> Most people in here probably have already read the news [*]. >>>>> AspectJ and AspectWerkz are merging. My understanding is that they >>>>> intend to frontends, AJ-style language-based and AW-style >>>>> annotation-based, to an enhanced common backend. >>>>> >>>>> Now, this might be a delicate issue, but I'll put it bluntly >>>>> nevertheless: Would there be a point in further consolidation with >>>>> Spring AOP? Spring already supports AspectJ besides its own AOP >>>>> variant; Spring and AspectWerkz already have aopalliance interfaces >>>>> in common. >>>>> >>>>> Michael >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [*] >>>>> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=31244 >>>>> http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextech.cgi/~checkout~/aspectj-home/aj5announce.html >>>>> |
