Re: [Springframework-developer] AOP consolidation

[Eugene K. <eu...@pl...>]

Rob Harrop wrote:

   You are right. It is in compiler extensions. Sorry for confusion.

   regards,
   Eugene


> If I remember correctly, the support for AOP Alliance interfaces is 
> included with the 2.0 distribution of AW. Check out the article on this 
> subject at 
> http://www.theserverside.com/articles/article.tss?l=AspectWerkzP1
> 
> Rob
> 
> Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
> 
>> Rob,
>>
>>> AW provides support for executing any advice that uses the AOP 
>>> Alliance interfaces. You are correct in saying that we should be able 
>>> to use AW internally within Spring.
>>
>>
>>
>>   It should be easy to implement some generic AW-based wrapper for 
>> aopalliance interfaces, but I wonder if you can send me a link to an 
>> existing one.
>>
>>   Thank you.
>>
>>   Eugene
>>
>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>> Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Michael,
>>>>
>>>>   As far as I know, AspectWerkz is not using aopalliance interfaces, 
>>>> but you should be able to use AW as AOP container for Spring already.
>>>>
>>>>   regards,
>>>>   Eugene
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Most people in here probably have already read the news [*]. 
>>>>> AspectJ and AspectWerkz are merging. My understanding is that they 
>>>>> intend to frontends, AJ-style language-based and AW-style 
>>>>> annotation-based, to an enhanced common backend.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, this might be a delicate issue, but I'll put it bluntly 
>>>>> nevertheless: Would there be a point in further consolidation with 
>>>>> Spring AOP? Spring already supports AspectJ besides its own AOP 
>>>>> variant; Spring and AspectWerkz already have aopalliance interfaces 
>>>>> in common.
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [*]
>>>>> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=31244
>>>>> http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextech.cgi/~checkout~/aspectj-home/aj5announce.html 
>>>>>