Menu
▾
▴
springframework-developer
|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-10-21 21:15:45
|
Everybody, =20 In contrast to the original plan of releasing 1.1.2 in mid November, I'd = like to suggest to release it signficantly earlier - possibly on Oct = 31st. We've already collected a quite large number of entries in the = changelog (most of them minor issues), so I guess it's appropriate to do = a release ASAP. =20 This would give us about 9 days for testing and polishing. Anything = that's not manageable within that timeframe, no matter if bugfix or = enhancement, should be deferred. Please test the current CVS contents as = thorougly as possible, and if you have the chance, address some of the = further issues currently marked for 1.1.2 in JIRA (in particular the doc = ones). =20 It seems that there are already enough minor issues and enhancement = suggestions to warrant a 1.1.3 release, possibly at the end of November. = Alternatively, we could go straight for 1.2 RC1, but I'm not too keen on = combining the planned number of major new features with that minor stuff = in one target milestone... I'd rather prefer 1.2 RC1 in early January. =20 Thoughts? Alternative suggestions? =20 Juergen |
|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-11-09 07:50:03
|
Hi everybody, =20 Once again, I'm about to prepare for release 1.1.2 :-) I've added two minor new features yesterday, following suggestions in = JIRA: =20 * added support for multi-dimensional collections to BeanWrapperImpl = (e.g. "map[myKey][0]" or "map[myKey][0].name") * added "setText(plainText, htmlText)" method to MimeMessageHelper, for = alternative texts in the same mail =20 If anyone has the chance, please give those a try, in particular the = BeanWrapperImpl change. I plan to do the actual release tomorrow now, if we don't encounter any = remaining issues. =20 Juergen |
|
From: R.J. L. <rjl...@co...> - 2004-10-21 21:56:18
|
Concurrent efforts? It's not always easy to do, but maybe work on 1.2 = RC1 and back port the minor issues to 1.1.3 (Similar to the Eclipse team's = 3.0.1 release which came out after 3.1 M1 but before 3.1 M2). Just a thought, R.J.=20 -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf = Of j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 4:18 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: [Springframework-developer] Preparing for 1.1.2 Everybody, =20 In contrast to the original plan of releasing 1.1.2 in mid November, I'd like to suggest to release it signficantly earlier - possibly on Oct = 31st. We've already collected a quite large number of entries in the changelog (most of them minor issues), so I guess it's appropriate to do a release ASAP. =20 This would give us about 9 days for testing and polishing. Anything = that's not manageable within that timeframe, no matter if bugfix or = enhancement, should be deferred. Please test the current CVS contents as thorougly as possible, and if you have the chance, address some of the further issues currently marked for 1.1.2 in JIRA (in particular the doc ones). =20 It seems that there are already enough minor issues and enhancement suggestions to warrant a 1.1.3 release, possibly at the end of November. Alternatively, we could go straight for 1.2 RC1, but I'm not too keen on combining the planned number of major new features with that minor stuff = in one target milestone... I'd rather prefer 1.2 RC1 in early January. =20 Thoughts? Alternative suggestions? =20 Juergen ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal = Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us = Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2004-10-21 22:17:57
|
+1 on 1.1.2 earlier. Most of the fixes since 1.1.1 are not that major, but a couple of them are nasty if you are actually affected by them. I've already told a few people to use the CVS version for one reason or another. If we are happy with the quality level I say go for it. I like the idea of 1.1.3 before 1.2RC, but I'm wondering if parallel development is really possible. I guess we can try for the sandbox for the major stuff, as was done before... jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: >Everybody, > >In contrast to the original plan of releasing 1.1.2 in mid November, I'd like to suggest to release it signficantly earlier - possibly on Oct 31st. We've already collected a quite large number of entries in the changelog (most of them minor issues), so I guess it's appropriate to do a release ASAP. > >This would give us about 9 days for testing and polishing. Anything that's not manageable within that timeframe, no matter if bugfix or enhancement, should be deferred. Please test the current CVS contents as thorougly as possible, and if you have the chance, address some of the further issues currently marked for 1.1.2 in JIRA (in particular the doc ones). > >It seems that there are already enough minor issues and enhancement suggestions to warrant a 1.1.3 release, possibly at the end of November. Alternatively, we could go straight for 1.2 RC1, but I'm not too keen on combining the planned number of major new features with that minor stuff in one target milestone... I'd rather prefer 1.2 RC1 in early January. > >Thoughts? Alternative suggestions? > >Juergen > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal >Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us >Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more >http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl >_______________________________________________ >Springframework-developer mailing list >Spr...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > |
|
From: Rob H. <ro...@ca...> - 2004-10-21 22:37:47
|
I think it is good idea to 1.1.2 out earlier than planned and I would like to include a fix for no-arg constructor proxies with CGLIB. I have already written the code in Cglib2AopProxy we just need to decide how we are going to modify ProxyFactory and ProxyFactoryBean so that the user can set the constructor args and contstructor arg types - any thoughts? Also how about releasing the initial batch of Jasper reports support? Rob jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: >Everybody, > >In contrast to the original plan of releasing 1.1.2 in mid November, I'd like to suggest to release it signficantly earlier - possibly on Oct 31st. We've already collected a quite large number of entries in the changelog (most of them minor issues), so I guess it's appropriate to do a release ASAP. > >This would give us about 9 days for testing and polishing. Anything that's not manageable within that timeframe, no matter if bugfix or enhancement, should be deferred. Please test the current CVS contents as thorougly as possible, and if you have the chance, address some of the further issues currently marked for 1.1.2 in JIRA (in particular the doc ones). > >It seems that there are already enough minor issues and enhancement suggestions to warrant a 1.1.3 release, possibly at the end of November. Alternatively, we could go straight for 1.2 RC1, but I'm not too keen on combining the planned number of major new features with that minor stuff in one target milestone... I'd rather prefer 1.2 RC1 in early January. > >Thoughts? Alternative suggestions? > >Juergen > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal >Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us >Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more >http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl >_______________________________________________ >Springframework-developer mailing list >Spr...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > |
|
From: Rod J. <ro...@in...> - 2004-10-22 08:43:20
|
Juergen I'm happy with an early release of 1.1.2. Good idea. I think most of the 1.2 work can happen in the sandbox, so I don't think there's a huge conflict there in CVS. It's mainly *new* stuff rather than modification. Rgds Rod jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: > Everybody, > > In contrast to the original plan of releasing 1.1.2 in mid November, I'd like to suggest to release it signficantly earlier - possibly on Oct 31st. We've already collected a quite large number of entries in the changelog (most of them minor issues), so I guess it's appropriate to do a release ASAP. > > This would give us about 9 days for testing and polishing. Anything that's not manageable within that timeframe, no matter if bugfix or enhancement, should be deferred. Please test the current CVS contents as thorougly as possible, and if you have the chance, address some of the further issues currently marked for 1.1.2 in JIRA (in particular the doc ones). > > It seems that there are already enough minor issues and enhancement suggestions to warrant a 1.1.3 release, possibly at the end of November. Alternatively, we could go straight for 1.2 RC1, but I'm not too keen on combining the planned number of major new features with that minor stuff in one target milestone... I'd rather prefer 1.2 RC1 in early January. > > Thoughts? Alternative suggestions? > > Juergen > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > |
