Menu
▾
▴
springframework-developer
|
From: William G. T. Jr. <wg...@ru...> - 2004-07-29 17:26:33
|
i'm not sure i feel strongly either way...traditionally I've always put $Id$ in every text file I management in CVS. This has also been the case in every open source project I have been involved in or used. That is not neccesarily a good enough reason to continue to do it... In web app dev $Id$ comes in really handy to verify the build process ran correctly and the thing you thought was deployed actually got deployed. for instance we put $Id$ in HTML comments for our Views so that we can view source in the running app to check the versions. however, I also understand the problem with branch/merge...but why doesn't the -kk solution work? +0 for $Id$ later. Bill Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: > Let's give others a chance ;-) > > Alef, Keith, Mark, Bill.... what's your vote? > > > Rob Harrop wrote: > >> Nothing like a good old fashioned standoff :) >> >> Shootout at noon? >> >> Rob >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: spr...@li... >> [mailto:spr...@li...] On >> Behalf Of >> Dmitriy Kopylenko >> Sent: 29 July 2004 16:16 >> To: spr...@li... >> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags >> >> 3 for (Rod, Dmitriy, Rob) >> 3 against (Juergen, Thomas, Colin) >> 1 neutral (Darren) >> >> >> Colin Sampaleanu wrote: >> >> >> >>> I do like $Id tags to be able to look at files and see who to blame >>> for the last changes :-), but I would rather be able to branch/merge >>> comfortably in the future. With Tortoise and Eclipse, I can see the >>> revision history _very_ easily anyways, wherever I am. >>> >>> So -1 for using them from now on (i.e let's get rid of them)... >>> >>> >>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Well, let's take a vote. I'm for $Id tags (+1) >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Dmitriy. >>>> >>>> >>>> jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I'd actually prefer if we drop $Id tags from all files. I >>>>> personally don't think that they add much value. Of course, if a >>>>> democratic decision goes in favor of those tags, well, I'll concede >>>>> ;-) >>>>> >>>>> Regarding @since tags, we're currently using them with the creation >>>>> date. That has been quite nice during our agile way towards 1.0. We >>>>> could indeed reconsider to use version numbers there now. >>>>> >>>>> Any suggestions on how to apply a consistent style for all source >>>>> files in a batch, without messing them up? $Id is probably easy, >>>>> @since nearly impossible, parameter alignment easy again. >>>>> >>>>> Juergen >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> >>>>> Von: spr...@li... im >>>>> Auftrag von Colin Sampaleanu >>>>> Gesendet: Mi 28.07.2004 20:38 >>>>> An: spr...@li... >>>>> Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> I like id keywords...they're mainly in the code through my >>>>>>> classes or >>>>>>> classes I've edited... (Damn, if it's standardized, I won't know >>>>>>> if I've >>>>>>> worked on a particular file any more :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I also insert $Id:$ when I work on existing classes or create new >>>>>> ones >>>>>> ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Dmitriy. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I personally like $Id tags. But they do suck big time when trying to >>>>> merge files back in after a branch, causing a conflict/change to exist >>>>> when there shouldn't be any... There seems to be a trend to going away >>>>> from using them in files, by some people, for this reason. >>>>> >>>>> Colin >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> |
|
From: Dmitriy K. <dko...@ru...> - 2004-07-29 17:32:17
|
3 in favor 4 against 2 neutral William G. Thompson, Jr. wrote: > i'm not sure i feel strongly either way...traditionally I've always > put $Id$ in every text file I management in CVS. This has also been > the case in every open source project I have been involved in or > used. That is not neccesarily a good enough reason to continue to do > it... > > In web app dev $Id$ comes in really handy to verify the build process > ran correctly and the thing you thought was deployed actually got > deployed. for instance we put $Id$ in HTML comments for our Views so > that we can view source in the running app to check the versions. > > however, I also understand the problem with branch/merge...but why > doesn't the -kk solution work? > > +0 for $Id$ > > later. > Bill > > > Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: > >> Let's give others a chance ;-) >> >> Alef, Keith, Mark, Bill.... what's your vote? >> >> >> Rob Harrop wrote: >> >>> Nothing like a good old fashioned standoff :) >>> >>> Shootout at noon? >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: spr...@li... >>> [mailto:spr...@li...] On >>> Behalf Of >>> Dmitriy Kopylenko >>> Sent: 29 July 2004 16:16 >>> To: spr...@li... >>> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags >>> >>> 3 for (Rod, Dmitriy, Rob) >>> 3 against (Juergen, Thomas, Colin) >>> 1 neutral (Darren) >>> >>> >>> Colin Sampaleanu wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I do like $Id tags to be able to look at files and see who to blame >>>> for the last changes :-), but I would rather be able to >>>> branch/merge comfortably in the future. With Tortoise and Eclipse, >>>> I can see the revision history _very_ easily anyways, wherever I am. >>>> >>>> So -1 for using them from now on (i.e let's get rid of them)... >>>> >>>> >>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Well, let's take a vote. I'm for $Id tags (+1) >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Dmitriy. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I'd actually prefer if we drop $Id tags from all files. I >>>>>> personally don't think that they add much value. Of course, if a >>>>>> democratic decision goes in favor of those tags, well, I'll >>>>>> concede ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Regarding @since tags, we're currently using them with the >>>>>> creation date. That has been quite nice during our agile way >>>>>> towards 1.0. We could indeed reconsider to use version numbers >>>>>> there now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any suggestions on how to apply a consistent style for all source >>>>>> files in a batch, without messing them up? $Id is probably easy, >>>>>> @since nearly impossible, parameter alignment easy again. >>>>>> >>>>>> Juergen >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>> >>>>>> Von: spr...@li... im >>>>>> Auftrag von Colin Sampaleanu >>>>>> Gesendet: Mi 28.07.2004 20:38 >>>>>> An: spr...@li... >>>>>> Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> I like id keywords...they're mainly in the code through my >>>>>>>> classes or >>>>>>>> classes I've edited... (Damn, if it's standardized, I won't >>>>>>>> know if I've >>>>>>>> worked on a particular file any more :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I also insert $Id:$ when I work on existing classes or create >>>>>>> new ones >>>>>>> ;-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dmitriy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I personally like $Id tags. But they do suck big time when trying to >>>>>> merge files back in after a branch, causing a conflict/change to >>>>>> exist >>>>>> when there shouldn't be any... There seems to be a trend to going >>>>>> away >>>>>> from using them in files, by some people, for this reason. >>>>>> >>>>>> Colin >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on > Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, > one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology > Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Dmitriy K. <dko...@ru...> - 2004-08-02 21:07:50
|
So is this the final vote? Are we getting rid of $Id$s then? Dmitriy. Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: > 3 in favor > 4 against > 2 neutral > > > William G. Thompson, Jr. wrote: > >> i'm not sure i feel strongly either way...traditionally I've always >> put $Id$ in every text file I management in CVS. This has also been >> the case in every open source project I have been involved in or >> used. That is not neccesarily a good enough reason to continue to do >> it... >> >> In web app dev $Id$ comes in really handy to verify the build process >> ran correctly and the thing you thought was deployed actually got >> deployed. for instance we put $Id$ in HTML comments for our Views so >> that we can view source in the running app to check the versions. >> >> however, I also understand the problem with branch/merge...but why >> doesn't the -kk solution work? >> >> +0 for $Id$ >> >> later. >> Bill >> >> >> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >> >>> Let's give others a chance ;-) >>> >>> Alef, Keith, Mark, Bill.... what's your vote? >>> >>> >>> Rob Harrop wrote: >>> >>>> Nothing like a good old fashioned standoff :) >>>> >>>> Shootout at noon? >>>> >>>> Rob >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: spr...@li... >>>> [mailto:spr...@li...] On >>>> Behalf Of >>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko >>>> Sent: 29 July 2004 16:16 >>>> To: spr...@li... >>>> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags >>>> >>>> 3 for (Rod, Dmitriy, Rob) >>>> 3 against (Juergen, Thomas, Colin) >>>> 1 neutral (Darren) >>>> >>>> >>>> Colin Sampaleanu wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I do like $Id tags to be able to look at files and see who to >>>>> blame for the last changes :-), but I would rather be able to >>>>> branch/merge comfortably in the future. With Tortoise and Eclipse, >>>>> I can see the revision history _very_ easily anyways, wherever I am. >>>>> >>>>> So -1 for using them from now on (i.e let's get rid of them)... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Well, let's take a vote. I'm for $Id tags (+1) >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Dmitriy. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd actually prefer if we drop $Id tags from all files. I >>>>>>> personally don't think that they add much value. Of course, if a >>>>>>> democratic decision goes in favor of those tags, well, I'll >>>>>>> concede ;-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regarding @since tags, we're currently using them with the >>>>>>> creation date. That has been quite nice during our agile way >>>>>>> towards 1.0. We could indeed reconsider to use version numbers >>>>>>> there now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any suggestions on how to apply a consistent style for all >>>>>>> source files in a batch, without messing them up? $Id is >>>>>>> probably easy, @since nearly impossible, parameter alignment >>>>>>> easy again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Juergen >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Von: spr...@li... im >>>>>>> Auftrag von Colin Sampaleanu >>>>>>> Gesendet: Mi 28.07.2004 20:38 >>>>>>> An: spr...@li... >>>>>>> Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I like id keywords...they're mainly in the code through my >>>>>>>>> classes or >>>>>>>>> classes I've edited... (Damn, if it's standardized, I won't >>>>>>>>> know if I've >>>>>>>>> worked on a particular file any more :-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I also insert $Id:$ when I work on existing classes or create >>>>>>>> new ones >>>>>>>> ;-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dmitriy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I personally like $Id tags. But they do suck big time when >>>>>>> trying to >>>>>>> merge files back in after a branch, causing a conflict/change to >>>>>>> exist >>>>>>> when there shouldn't be any... There seems to be a trend to >>>>>>> going away >>>>>>> from using them in files, by some people, for this reason. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Colin >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on >> Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, >> one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology >> Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Springframework-developer mailing list >> Spr...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on > Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, > one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology > Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: jbetancourt <jbe...@co...> - 2004-08-02 23:35:25
|
A correction from one of my previous posts; apparently at my company we were using an older CVS version. -kk works now. from: http://cvsdoc-zh.gro.clinux.org/cvsdoc/en/html/Merging-and-keywords.html "In CVS version 1.12.2 and later, the keyword expansion mode provided on the command line to any CVS command no longer overrides the -kb keyword expansion mode setting for binary files, though it will still override other default keyword expansion modes. You can now safely merge using -kk to avoid spurious conflicts on lines containing RCS keywords, even when your repository contains binary files. " ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dmitriy Kopylenko" <dko...@ru...> To: <spr...@li...> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 6:05 PM Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags > So is this the final vote? Are we getting rid of $Id$s then? > > Dmitriy. > > Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: > > > 3 in favor > > 4 against > > 2 neutral > > > > > > William G. Thompson, Jr. wrote: > > > >> i'm not sure i feel strongly either way...traditionally I've always > >> put $Id$ in every text file I management in CVS. This has also been > >> the case in every open source project I have been involved in or > >> used. That is not neccesarily a good enough reason to continue to do > >> it... > >> > >> In web app dev $Id$ comes in really handy to verify the build process > >> ran correctly and the thing you thought was deployed actually got > >> deployed. for instance we put $Id$ in HTML comments for our Views so > >> that we can view source in the running app to check the versions. > >> > >> however, I also understand the problem with branch/merge...but why > >> doesn't the -kk solution work? > >> > >> +0 for $Id$ > >> > >> later. > >> Bill > >> > >> > >> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: > >> > >>> Let's give others a chance ;-) > >>> > >>> Alef, Keith, Mark, Bill.... what's your vote? > >>> > >>> > >>> Rob Harrop wrote: > >>> > >>>> Nothing like a good old fashioned standoff :) > >>>> > >>>> Shootout at noon? > >>>> > >>>> Rob > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: spr...@li... > >>>> [mailto:spr...@li...] On > >>>> Behalf Of > >>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko > >>>> Sent: 29 July 2004 16:16 > >>>> To: spr...@li... > >>>> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags > >>>> > >>>> 3 for (Rod, Dmitriy, Rob) > >>>> 3 against (Juergen, Thomas, Colin) > >>>> 1 neutral (Darren) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> I do like $Id tags to be able to look at files and see who to > >>>>> blame for the last changes :-), but I would rather be able to > >>>>> branch/merge comfortably in the future. With Tortoise and Eclipse, > >>>>> I can see the revision history _very_ easily anyways, wherever I am. > >>>>> > >>>>> So -1 for using them from now on (i.e let's get rid of them)... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Well, let's take a vote. I'm for $Id tags (+1) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> Dmitriy. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'd actually prefer if we drop $Id tags from all files. I > >>>>>>> personally don't think that they add much value. Of course, if a > >>>>>>> democratic decision goes in favor of those tags, well, I'll > >>>>>>> concede ;-) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regarding @since tags, we're currently using them with the > >>>>>>> creation date. That has been quite nice during our agile way > >>>>>>> towards 1.0. We could indeed reconsider to use version numbers > >>>>>>> there now. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Any suggestions on how to apply a consistent style for all > >>>>>>> source files in a batch, without messing them up? $Id is > >>>>>>> probably easy, @since nearly impossible, parameter alignment > >>>>>>> easy again. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Juergen > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ________________________________ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Von: spr...@li... im > >>>>>>> Auftrag von Colin Sampaleanu > >>>>>>> Gesendet: Mi 28.07.2004 20:38 > >>>>>>> An: spr...@li... > >>>>>>> Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I like id keywords...they're mainly in the code through my > >>>>>>>>> classes or > >>>>>>>>> classes I've edited... (Damn, if it's standardized, I won't > >>>>>>>>> know if I've > >>>>>>>>> worked on a particular file any more :-) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I also insert $Id:$ when I work on existing classes or create > >>>>>>>> new ones > >>>>>>>> ;-) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Dmitriy. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I personally like $Id tags. But they do suck big time when > >>>>>>> trying to > >>>>>>> merge files back in after a branch, causing a conflict/change to > >>>>>>> exist > >>>>>>> when there shouldn't be any... There seems to be a trend to > >>>>>>> going away > >>>>>>> from using them in files, by some people, for this reason. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Colin > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on > >> Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, > >> one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology > >> Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Springframework-developer mailing list > >> Spr...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on > > Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, > > one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology > > Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Springframework-developer mailing list > > Spr...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on > Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, > one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology > Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2004-07-29 17:52:00
|
The -kk solution doesn't really work because then even binary files will be pulled out as text, so they'd have to be treated separately. Additionally, I don't remember seeing any kind of control over this in Eclipse last time I looked at its ability to do merges. William G. Thompson, Jr. wrote: > i'm not sure i feel strongly either way...traditionally I've always > put $Id$ in every text file I management in CVS. This has also been > the case in every open source project I have been involved in or > used. That is not neccesarily a good enough reason to continue to do > it... > > In web app dev $Id$ comes in really handy to verify the build process > ran correctly and the thing you thought was deployed actually got > deployed. for instance we put $Id$ in HTML comments for our Views so > that we can view source in the running app to check the versions. > > however, I also understand the problem with branch/merge...but why > doesn't the -kk solution work? > > +0 for $Id$ > > later. > Bill > > > Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: > >> Let's give others a chance ;-) >> >> Alef, Keith, Mark, Bill.... what's your vote? >> >> >> Rob Harrop wrote: >> >>> Nothing like a good old fashioned standoff :) >>> >>> Shootout at noon? >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: spr...@li... >>> [mailto:spr...@li...] On >>> Behalf Of >>> Dmitriy Kopylenko >>> Sent: 29 July 2004 16:16 >>> To: spr...@li... >>> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags >>> >>> 3 for (Rod, Dmitriy, Rob) >>> 3 against (Juergen, Thomas, Colin) >>> 1 neutral (Darren) >>> >>> >>> Colin Sampaleanu wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I do like $Id tags to be able to look at files and see who to blame >>>> for the last changes :-), but I would rather be able to >>>> branch/merge comfortably in the future. With Tortoise and Eclipse, >>>> I can see the revision history _very_ easily anyways, wherever I am. >>>> >>>> So -1 for using them from now on (i.e let's get rid of them)... >>>> >>>> >>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Well, let's take a vote. I'm for $Id tags (+1) >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Dmitriy. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I'd actually prefer if we drop $Id tags from all files. I >>>>>> personally don't think that they add much value. Of course, if a >>>>>> democratic decision goes in favor of those tags, well, I'll >>>>>> concede ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Regarding @since tags, we're currently using them with the >>>>>> creation date. That has been quite nice during our agile way >>>>>> towards 1.0. We could indeed reconsider to use version numbers >>>>>> there now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any suggestions on how to apply a consistent style for all source >>>>>> files in a batch, without messing them up? $Id is probably easy, >>>>>> @since nearly impossible, parameter alignment easy again. >>>>>> >>>>>> Juergen >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>> >>>>>> Von: spr...@li... im >>>>>> Auftrag von Colin Sampaleanu >>>>>> Gesendet: Mi 28.07.2004 20:38 >>>>>> An: spr...@li... >>>>>> Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> I like id keywords...they're mainly in the code through my >>>>>>>> classes or >>>>>>>> classes I've edited... (Damn, if it's standardized, I won't >>>>>>>> know if I've >>>>>>>> worked on a particular file any more :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I also insert $Id:$ when I work on existing classes or create >>>>>>> new ones >>>>>>> ;-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dmitriy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I personally like $Id tags. But they do suck big time when trying to >>>>>> merge files back in after a branch, causing a conflict/change to >>>>>> exist >>>>>> when there shouldn't be any... There seems to be a trend to going >>>>>> away >>>>>> from using them in files, by some people, for this reason. >>>>>> >>>>>> Colin >>>>>> >>>>> |
