Menu
▾
▴
springframework-developer
|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-02-17 21:42:42
|
I may be totally off the track here, but can't we simply branch from the = "release-1-0" tag in CVS then - on demand? IIRC, CVS allows to branch = from any tag in the past, doesn't it? =20 The only disadvantage is that 1.1 work should not be committed to CVS = head before the 1.0 final snapshot gets taken. However, this does not = seem to be a problem for me, as 1.0 final will be released soon enough. =20 Juergen =20 ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag = von Rod Johnson Gesendet: Di 17.02.2004 22:29 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] branching CVS Yes, I think we're going to have to do this soon. I was against it = earlier as we were still adding new features. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Davison" <da...@da...> To: <spr...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 8:47 PM Subject: [Springframework-developer] branching CVS -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I remember this being asked a while back, but are there any plans to = branch the 1.0 code in CVS so that HEAD continues to be used for 1.1 and = beyond? If not, how will 1.0 bugs/revisions be handled once new features begin = to be implemented? - -- Darren Davison Public Key: http://www.davison.uk.net/key.jsp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAMn3YKLMLAN01aw0RAg1+AJ9SwnsV4Mpyf8IPn6WBu4K6PcPiEQCbBkGQ JFXwaxVq/0EnIRpb6iMsIzQ=3D =3DVgU+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id438&op=3Dick _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1356&alloc_id=3D3438&op=3Dclick _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2004-02-17 21:56:27
|
Yes, I agree. ----- Original Message ----- From: "j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]" <jue...@we...> To: <spr...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:35 PM Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] branching CVS I may be totally off the track here, but can't we simply branch from the "release-1-0" tag in CVS then - on demand? IIRC, CVS allows to branch fro= m any tag in the past, doesn't it? The only disadvantage is that 1.1 work should not be committed to CVS hea= d before the 1.0 final snapshot gets taken. However, this does not seem to = be a problem for me, as 1.0 final will be released soon enough. Juergen ________________________________ Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag von Rod Johnson Gesendet: Di 17.02.2004 22:29 An: spr...@li... Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] branching CVS Yes, I think we're going to have to do this soon. I was against it earlie= r as we were still adding new features. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Davison" <da...@da...> To: <spr...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 8:47 PM Subject: [Springframework-developer] branching CVS -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I remember this being asked a while back, but are there any plans to bran= ch the 1.0 code in CVS so that HEAD continues to be used for 1.1 and beyond? If not, how will 1.0 bugs/revisions be handled once new features begin to be implemented? - -- Darren Davison Public Key: http://www.davison.uk.net/key.jsp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAMn3YKLMLAN01aw0RAg1+AJ9SwnsV4Mpyf8IPn6WBu4K6PcPiEQCbBkGQ JFXwaxVq/0EnIRpb6iMsIzQ=3D =3DVgU+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id438&op=3Dick _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1356&alloc_id=3D3438&op=3Dclick _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id438&op=3Dick _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2004-02-17 23:38:04
|
You can indeed branch off a tag. The reason why you would want to go ahead and actually create the branch is that you actually want to commit code to both the branch and HEAD. For 3-4 weeks, I personally have no time to do even as much 1.0 stuff as I'd like to, never mind 1.1 features, so a branch makes sense only if other people want to check in code there. jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: >I may be totally off the track here, but can't we simply branch from the "release-1-0" tag in CVS then - on demand? IIRC, CVS allows to branch from any tag in the past, doesn't it? > >The only disadvantage is that 1.1 work should not be committed to CVS head before the 1.0 final snapshot gets taken. However, this does not seem to be a problem for me, as 1.0 final will be released soon enough. > >Juergen > > >________________________________ > >Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag von Rod Johnson >Gesendet: Di 17.02.2004 22:29 >An: spr...@li... >Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] branching CVS > > > >Yes, I think we're going to have to do this soon. I was against it earlier >as we were still adding new features. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Darren Davison" <da...@da...> >To: <spr...@li...> >Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 8:47 PM >Subject: [Springframework-developer] branching CVS > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >I remember this being asked a while back, but are there any plans to branch >the 1.0 code in CVS so that HEAD continues to be used for 1.1 and beyond? >If not, how will 1.0 bugs/revisions be handled once new features begin to >be implemented? > >- -- > >Darren Davison >Public Key: http://www.davison.uk.net/key.jsp >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > >iD8DBQFAMn3YKLMLAN01aw0RAg1+AJ9SwnsV4Mpyf8IPn6WBu4K6PcPiEQCbBkGQ >JFXwaxVq/0EnIRpb6iMsIzQ= >=VgU+ >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > |
