springframework-developer

Re: [Springframework-developer] ant.bat in the root of the project

[<jue...@we...>]

Colin,=20

I see that ant.bat is not an ideal name due to the conflict with the =
default ant.bat - I'll change all ant.bat files to build.bat.

I tend to agree regarding Ant for building the framework. What our =
included ant.jar is mainly targetted at is building the samples, or even =
running them in case of our JPetStore remote client. And if we'll =
include ant.jar for that anyway, we can and should also provide a =
convenience build.bat for the framework itself, IMO.

Juergen=20


-----Original Message-----=20
From: spr...@li...=20
[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf=20
Of Colin Sampaleanu=20
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:46 AM=20
To: spr...@li...=20
Subject: [Springframework-developer] ant.bat in the root of the project=20


Hi Juergen,=20

Did you intend to add ant.bat to the root of the project? It interferes=20
with whatever ant version a user may have on their system.=20

It is completely normal and expected (by just about every project out=20
there) that people have ant installed on their systems, so I've never=20
understood the practice of adding batch files / shell scripts to=20
projects to start ant with Ditto for including ant libs in the project=20
itself; that's a lot of baggage to carry around just in case somebody=20
doesn't have ant handy...=20

If you do want the file there, perhaps it could be named build.bat?=20

What about the ant libs in the lib dir, is there really any need to have =

them?=20

Regards,=20
Colin=20





-------------------------------------------------------=20
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.=20
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for =
IBM's=20
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys =
admin.=20
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1278&alloc_id=3D3371&op=3Dclick=20
_______________________________________________=20
Springframework-developer mailing list=20
Spr...@li...=20
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer=20

Re: [Springframework-developer] ant.bat in the root of the project

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

I think it is completely reasonable for us to expect anybody who wants=20
to build our samples or run them to already have ant installed on their=20
system. Again, this is the expectation of 99% of the projects out there.

(I actually used to do exactly the same thing, include ant libs with=20
every single project, and a build.bat/build.sh in the root. Then a=20
couple of years ago, when ant became completely ubiquitous, I thought=20
about it and realized there was really no reason any longer; it's like=20
assuming make is available, etc.).

Anyways, if you think it makes sense, I really have no problem with it...

j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote:

>Colin,=20
>
>I see that ant.bat is not an ideal name due to the conflict with the def=
ault ant.bat - I'll change all ant.bat files to build.bat.
>
>I tend to agree regarding Ant for building the framework. What our inclu=
ded ant.jar is mainly targetted at is building the samples, or even runni=
ng them in case of our JPetStore remote client. And if we'll include ant.=
jar for that anyway, we can and should also provide a convenience build.b=
at for the framework itself, IMO.
>
>Juergen=20
>
>
>-----Original Message-----=20
>From: spr...@li...=20
>[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf=20
>Of Colin Sampaleanu=20
>Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:46 AM=20
>To: spr...@li...=20
>Subject: [Springframework-developer] ant.bat in the root of the project=20
>
>
>Hi Juergen,=20
>
>Did you intend to add ant.bat to the root of the project? It interferes=20
>with whatever ant version a user may have on their system.=20
>
>It is completely normal and expected (by just about every project out=20
>there) that people have ant installed on their systems, so I've never=20
>understood the practice of adding batch files / shell scripts to=20
>projects to start ant with Ditto for including ant libs in the project=20
>itself; that's a lot of baggage to carry around just in case somebody=20
>doesn't have ant handy...=20
>
>If you do want the file there, perhaps it could be named build.bat?=20
>
>What about the ant libs in the lib dir, is there really any need to have=
=20
>them?=20
>
>Regards,=20
>Colin=20
> =20
>