|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-01-07 18:54:29
|
Colin,=20 I see that ant.bat is not an ideal name due to the conflict with the = default ant.bat - I'll change all ant.bat files to build.bat. I tend to agree regarding Ant for building the framework. What our = included ant.jar is mainly targetted at is building the samples, or even = running them in case of our JPetStore remote client. And if we'll = include ant.jar for that anyway, we can and should also provide a = convenience build.bat for the framework itself, IMO. Juergen=20 -----Original Message-----=20 From: spr...@li...=20 [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf=20 Of Colin Sampaleanu=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:46 AM=20 To: spr...@li...=20 Subject: [Springframework-developer] ant.bat in the root of the project=20 Hi Juergen,=20 Did you intend to add ant.bat to the root of the project? It interferes=20 with whatever ant version a user may have on their system.=20 It is completely normal and expected (by just about every project out=20 there) that people have ant installed on their systems, so I've never=20 understood the practice of adding batch files / shell scripts to=20 projects to start ant with Ditto for including ant libs in the project=20 itself; that's a lot of baggage to carry around just in case somebody=20 doesn't have ant handy...=20 If you do want the file there, perhaps it could be named build.bat?=20 What about the ant libs in the lib dir, is there really any need to have = them?=20 Regards,=20 Colin=20 -------------------------------------------------------=20 This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.=20 Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for = IBM's=20 Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys = admin.=20 Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1278&alloc_id=3D3371&op=3Dclick=20 _______________________________________________=20 Springframework-developer mailing list=20 Spr...@li...=20 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer=20 |