|
From: Kopylenko, D. <dko...@ac...> - 2003-12-22 18:42:34
|
Ivan, just FYI, in the pdf doc for the scheduler it says Hibernate 1.0m1 3 Regards, Dmitriy. -----Original Message----- From: Ivan Ristic [mailto:iv...@we...] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 11:58 AM To: spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Scheduler update #3 Mark Imbriaco wrote: > Ivan Ristic <> scribbled on Monday, December 22, 2003 9:03 AM: > >>I don't want to label it full 1.0 before I (or someone else) actually >>use it in a project. Ignore the licence, I always use GPL by default. > > I don't believe the ASL, which Spring is licensed under, can include > GPLed code without violating the GPL. The LGPL would probably be ok, > since it explicitly allows linking. > > I could be wrong, but that's my understanding of the situation. > Someone please correct me if I'm missing something. I don't think that ASL is compatible with GPL (or LGPL) either. But I had to put some kind of licence on the code and I normally use GPL. If the scheduler makes it into Spring the licence will be ASL. -- ModSecurity (http://www.modsecurity.org) [ Open source IDS for Web applications ] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Kopylenko, D. <dko...@ac...> - 2003-12-22 19:42:00
|
Alef, what are you using for DocBook ? Dmitriy. -----Original Message----- From: Ivan Ristic [mailto:iv...@we...] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 2:02 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Scheduler update #3 Kopylenko, Dmitry wrote: > Ivan, just FYI, in the pdf doc for the scheduler it says Hibernate > 1.0m1 3 Thanks, I missed that. The name is probably embedded somewhere in the stylesheet, and I haven't looked at it yet. Speaking of documentation, is anyone aware of a good visual tool for producing DocBook documentation? Altova's Authentic (http://www.altova.com/products_doc.html) is pretty good (and also free) but it does not support pre-formatted areas at the moment (I reported the bug). I've tried half of dozen of other XML editors but none seem to give you a real advantage over a plain old text editor. My other bet is OpenOffice, but its XSL stylesheet also needs to be tweaked to support preformatted areas. I haven't gotten around to doing that yet. -- ModSecurity (http://www.modsecurity.org) [ Open source IDS for Web applications ] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Ivan R. <iv...@we...> - 2003-12-22 19:13:23
|
Kopylenko, Dmitry wrote: > Ivan, just FYI, in the pdf doc for the scheduler it says Hibernate 1.0m1 3 Thanks, I missed that. The name is probably embedded somewhere in the stylesheet, and I haven't looked at it yet. Speaking of documentation, is anyone aware of a good visual tool for producing DocBook documentation? Altova's Authentic (http://www.altova.com/products_doc.html) is pretty good (and also free) but it does not support pre-formatted areas at the moment (I reported the bug). I've tried half of dozen of other XML editors but none seem to give you a real advantage over a plain old text editor. My other bet is OpenOffice, but its XSL stylesheet also needs to be tweaked to support preformatted areas. I haven't gotten around to doing that yet. -- ModSecurity (http://www.modsecurity.org) [ Open source IDS for Web applications ] |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2003-12-22 20:50:23
|
Ivan Ristic wrote: > Kopylenko, Dmitry wrote: > >> Ivan, just FYI, in the pdf doc for the scheduler it says Hibernate >> 1.0m1 3 > > > Thanks, I missed that. The name is probably embedded somewhere > in the stylesheet, and I haven't looked at it yet. > > Speaking of documentation, is anyone aware of a good visual tool > for producing DocBook documentation? Altova's Authentic > (http://www.altova.com/products_doc.html) is pretty > good (and also free) but it does not support pre-formatted areas > at the moment (I reported the bug). I've tried half of dozen of other > XML editors but none seem to give you a real advantage over > a plain old text editor. > > My other bet is OpenOffice, but its XSL stylesheet also needs to be > tweaked to support preformatted areas. I haven't gotten around > to doing that yet. > I just came across a referece to the XMLmind XML Editor, which supports editing of DocBook format docs in the free version, as long as you use the docbook dtd definition, not the schema def... |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2003-12-22 20:55:39
|
Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > Ivan Ristic wrote: > >> Kopylenko, Dmitry wrote: >> >>> Ivan, just FYI, in the pdf doc for the scheduler it says Hibernate >>> 1.0m1 3 >> >> >> >> Thanks, I missed that. The name is probably embedded somewhere >> in the stylesheet, and I haven't looked at it yet. >> >> Speaking of documentation, is anyone aware of a good visual tool >> for producing DocBook documentation? Altova's Authentic >> (http://www.altova.com/products_doc.html) is pretty >> good (and also free) but it does not support pre-formatted areas >> at the moment (I reported the bug). I've tried half of dozen of other >> XML editors but none seem to give you a real advantage over >> a plain old text editor. >> >> My other bet is OpenOffice, but its XSL stylesheet also needs to be >> tweaked to support preformatted areas. I haven't gotten around >> to doing that yet. >> > I just came across a referece to the XMLmind XML Editor, which > supports editing of DocBook format docs in the free version, as long > as you use the docbook dtd definition, not the schema def... Sorry, left out the URL: http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/ |