I agree with Ken.
It should be *possible*, but not necessary, to download and build all of
Spring with the demos. It should be easy to get started with a minimum of
fuss.
Regards,
Rod
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Krebs" <kk...@kk...>
To: "jürgen höller [werk3AT]" <jue...@we...>
Cc: "'spring-dev-list'" <spr...@li...>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:26 PM
Subject: [Springframework-developer] Sample Application build process
> Juergen,
>
> The changes you made to the Petclinic build files have raised an
> interesting issue which applies to all sample programs:
>
> The changes made now require a user of the sample app to download and
> build the entire Spring framework. It was specifically my intent with
> Petclinic to not require this. I had envisioned a separately
> downloadable distribution of the sample. Many if not most developers are
> just going to want to use the framework runtime jars, at least at first
> when they're taking it out for a test drive.
>
> The prjzip ant target is only needed to create a distribution so it
> probably be in a separate file which will not be included in the
> distribution. This prjzip target will need to grab a current snapshot of
> the libs for inclusion in the distribution. I haven't quite worked out
> the best way to implement this yet.
>
> What are your thoughts on this ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
> Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
> Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
> INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
|
