|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2003-06-23 19:35:51
|
I agree with Ken. It should be *possible*, but not necessary, to download and build all of Spring with the demos. It should be easy to get started with a minimum of fuss. Regards, Rod ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Krebs" <kk...@kk...> To: "jürgen höller [werk3AT]" <jue...@we...> Cc: "'spring-dev-list'" <spr...@li...> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:26 PM Subject: [Springframework-developer] Sample Application build process > Juergen, > > The changes you made to the Petclinic build files have raised an > interesting issue which applies to all sample programs: > > The changes made now require a user of the sample app to download and > build the entire Spring framework. It was specifically my intent with > Petclinic to not require this. I had envisioned a separately > downloadable distribution of the sample. Many if not most developers are > just going to want to use the framework runtime jars, at least at first > when they're taking it out for a test drive. > > The prjzip ant target is only needed to create a distribution so it > probably be in a separate file which will not be included in the > distribution. This prjzip target will need to grab a current snapshot of > the libs for inclusion in the distribution. I haven't quite worked out > the best way to implement this yet. > > What are your thoughts on this ? > > Regards, > > Ken > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU > Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. > Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! > INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > |