Menu
▾
▴
springframework-developer
|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2003-08-31 19:06:39
|
Another candidate on my simplification hitlist: shared object support for ApplicationContexts. I added this relatively late before the project went open source. Juergen and I agree it's probably not necessary. Anyone using it? Please let me know if you object to it being removed. As I've said, I'm keen to simplify the API and implementation to just what's necessary and best practice before 1.0. Regards, Rod |
|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-09-01 07:04:38
|
+1 -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] Namens Rod Johnson Verzonden: Sunday, August 31, 2003 9:04 PM Aan: spr...@li... Onderwerp: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support Another candidate on my simplification hitlist: shared object support for ApplicationContexts. I added this relatively late before the project went open source. Juergen and I agree it's probably not necessary. Anyone using it? Please let me know if you object to it being removed. As I've said, I'm keen to simplify the API and implementation to just what's necessary and best practice before 1.0. Regards, Rod ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2003-09-01 22:46:23
|
Alef, Do you mean you do or don't object to removing shared object support? The only thing that removing it breaks is the Tiles support. If you agree it should be removed, are you happy to change this first? Regards, Rod ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alef Arendsen (JTeam)" <al...@jt...> To: "'Rod Johnson'" <rod...@in...>; <spr...@li...> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 8:04 AM Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support > +1 > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: spr...@li... > [mailto:spr...@li...] Namens > Rod Johnson > Verzonden: Sunday, August 31, 2003 9:04 PM > Aan: spr...@li... > Onderwerp: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support > > > Another candidate on my simplification hitlist: shared object support > for ApplicationContexts. > > I added this relatively late before the project went open source. > Juergen and I agree it's probably not necessary. > > Anyone using it? Please let me know if you object to it being removed. > > As I've said, I'm keen to simplify the API and implementation to just > what's necessary and best practice before 1.0. > > Regards, > Rod > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > |
|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-09-02 08:32:27
|
I don't object to anything that'll simplifies API's. I'll have a look into in this afternoon... Alef -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Rod Johnson [mailto:rod...@in...] Verzonden: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 12:42 AM Aan: al...@jt...; spr...@li... Onderwerp: Re: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support Alef, Do you mean you do or don't object to removing shared object support? The only thing that removing it breaks is the Tiles support. If you agree it should be removed, are you happy to change this first? Regards, Rod ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alef Arendsen (JTeam)" <al...@jt...> To: "'Rod Johnson'" <rod...@in...>; <spr...@li...> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 8:04 AM Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support > +1 > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: spr...@li... > [mailto:spr...@li...] Namens > Rod Johnson > Verzonden: Sunday, August 31, 2003 9:04 PM > Aan: spr...@li... > Onderwerp: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support > > > Another candidate on my simplification hitlist: shared object support > for ApplicationContexts. > > I added this relatively late before the project went open source. > Juergen and I agree it's probably not necessary. > > Anyone using it? Please let me know if you object to it being removed. > > As I've said, I'm keen to simplify the API and implementation to just > what's necessary and best practice before 1.0. > > Regards, > Rod > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2003-09-01 23:54:42
|
Is this explained anywhere? Perhaps you could point me to the class or package if it takes more than a sentence or two to describe what it is... Regards, Colin Rod Johnson wrote: >Another candidate on my simplification hitlist: shared object support for >ApplicationContexts. > >I added this relatively late before the project went open source. Juergen >and I agree it's probably not necessary. > >Anyone using it? Please let me know if you object to it being removed. > >As I've said, I'm keen to simplify the API and implementation to just what's >necessary and best practice before 1.0. > >Regards, >Rod > > |
|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2003-09-02 06:59:00
|
> Is this explained anywhere? No, another reason for wanting to get rid of it :-) >Perhaps you could point me to the class or > package if it takes more than a sentence or two to describe what it is... org.sfw.context.ApplicationContext interface and org.sfw.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext. Regards, Rod > > Rod Johnson wrote: > > >Another candidate on my simplification hitlist: shared object support for > >ApplicationContexts. > > > >I added this relatively late before the project went open source. Juergen > >and I agree it's probably not necessary. > > > >Anyone using it? Please let me know if you object to it being removed. > > > >As I've said, I'm keen to simplify the API and implementation to just what's > >necessary and best practice before 1.0. > > > >Regards, > >Rod > > > > > > > > |
|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-09-02 21:46:20
|
Rod, I've removed the dependencies on the shared object support from the Tiles classes, so you're free to remove it from the context classes and the tests. Cheers, Alef |
|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2003-09-02 22:00:38
|
Thanks Alef, I've now removed shared object support. Regards, Rod ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alef Arendsen (JTeam)" <al...@jt...> To: "'Rod Johnson'" <rod...@in...> Cc: <spr...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 10:59 PM Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support > Rod, > > I've removed the dependencies on the shared object support from the > Tiles classes, so you're free to remove it from the context classes and > the tests. > > Cheers, > Alef > > > |
