You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
(55) |
Mar
(100) |
Apr
(203) |
May
(330) |
Jun
(190) |
Jul
(302) |
Aug
(323) |
Sep
(197) |
Oct
(245) |
Nov
(490) |
Dec
(330) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(194) |
Feb
(400) |
Mar
(416) |
Apr
(415) |
May
(359) |
Jun
(381) |
Jul
(491) |
Aug
(311) |
Sep
(291) |
Oct
(273) |
Nov
(355) |
Dec
(266) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(306) |
Feb
(303) |
Mar
(520) |
Apr
(346) |
May
(255) |
Jun
(221) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(247) |
Sep
(147) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(165) |
Dec
(65) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(90) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(121) |
Apr
(103) |
May
(113) |
Jun
(103) |
Jul
(104) |
Aug
(67) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(78) |
Dec
(70) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(76) |
Mar
(63) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(41) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(21) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(33) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(97) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(50) |
Apr
(71) |
May
(70) |
Jun
(64) |
Jul
(45) |
Aug
(62) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2026 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Matthew E. P. <mat...@me...> - 2005-04-20 08:06:38
|
Ross: We (Contegix) host the server. I am not seeing this message now. =20 Are you? Cheers, Matthew On Apr 20, 2005, at 2:58 AM, Mason, Ross wrote: > Hey guys, > =A0 > I'm getting a 404 on http://forum.springframework.org/ > =A0 > Ross |
|
From: Mason, R. <ros...@vi...> - 2005-04-20 07:59:16
|
Hey guys, =20 I'm getting a 404 on http://forum.springframework.org/ =20 Ross |
|
From: J. E. R. <er...@di...> - 2005-04-20 05:34:32
|
Hi, A Portlet is not a Servlet, a set of portlets are invoked directly by the portlet-container in one client request. The portlet spec says: "If the client request is triggered by an action URL, the portal/portlet-container must first trigger the action request by invoking the processAction method of the targeted portlet. The portal/portlet-container must wait until the action request finishes. Then, the portal/portlet-container must trigger the render request by invoking the render method for all the portlets in the portal page with the possible exception of portlets for which their content is being cached. The render requests may be executed sequentially or in parallel without any guaranteed order." Note that 'the render request may be executed IN PARALLEL', as I understand it, each render request could be executed on different threads. I think this feature advises against the use of OpenSessionInViewFilter class with portlets. >Well, if OpenSessionInViewFilter doesn't kick in for portlets, no other >filter will kick in with portlets either. Isn't there maybe some general >issue hiding there? > >Of course we can provide an OpenSessionInViewInterceptor for portlets, but >I'm not sure whether that's actually a good fit there. The Portlet request >flow with separate handle and render callbacks makes this less compelling. > >What we certainly can't do is let the existing OpenSessionInViewInterceptor >implement some PortletControllerInterceptor interface. That would force >every Servlet user to have the portlet.jar on the classpath. > >Juergen > > >-----Original Message----- >From: spr...@li... >[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf >Of Erwin Vervaet >Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 9:26 PM >To: spr...@li... >Subject: [Springframework-developer] OpenSessionInView and portlet >support > > >Apparently the existing OSIV filter does not work with portlets: > >http://forum.springframework.org/viewtopic.php?t=4907 > >I guess we should tackle this issue when doing the Portlet support for 1.3. >There is no PortletMVC category in JIRA so I'm not sure where to file it... >Any input from the Porlet people? > >Erwin Vervaet >erw...@er... > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. >Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in >creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info, >new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 >_______________________________________________ >Springframework-developer mailing list >Spr...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. >Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in >creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info, >new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 >_______________________________________________ >Springframework-developer mailing list >Spr...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > -- J.Enrique Ruiz Director de I+D+I - DiSiD S.L.L. (http://www.disid.com) Tel +34 655 407 965 Email: er...@di... |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2005-04-20 02:26:43
|
This reminds me that Spring 1.2 is probably the appropriate time for Acegi's FilterToBeanProxy to move over from Acegi to Spring. While I know we deferred on this before because you had some concerns about lifecycle owneship, in practice the class is very useful, and it (or something like it) really belongs in Spring... Colin Juergen Hoeller wrote: >Yes, there are essentially these two options: either require Spring 1.2 as >of the next Acegi release (which should probably be called 0.9 then), or >copy the old PathMatcher over. In the former case, Acegi should follow the >new Spring pattern there: components that need path-matching functionality >receive a PathMatcher implementation through dependency injection, using an >AntPathMatcher as default. > >BTW, it would be good to unify the codebases in the mid term, for example >moving some of the generic Acegi utility stuff over to the main Spring >codebase. IMO, we should do this for Acegi Security 1.0 at the latest, with >Acegi concentrating on the actual security support only. In any case, I >guess it's inevitable to depend on a specific Spring release level at some >point. > >Juergen > > >-----Original Message----- >From: spr...@li... >[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf >Of Andy Depue >Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 10:52 PM >To: spr...@li... >Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Spring 1.2 RC2 and Acegi >Security > > >I should note that I ran across this earlier and posted a patch to the Acegi >developer's list (see >http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.springframework.acegisecurity.devel >/864 ). >I didn't officially submit this patch, as it breaks backward compatibility >with Spring (it will only run with the very latest Spring). If a goal of >the >Acegi project is to maintain such compability, it will probably either want >to remove the dependency (by copying the code into the Acegi project), or >use >reflection or other technique at runtime to dynamically adapt to the Spring >version. > > - Andy > >On Tuesday 19 April 2005 12:11 pm, Juergen Hoeller wrote: > > >>Hi Ben, >> >>as Matt has noticed, there is a change in Spring 1.2 RC2 that breaks Acegi >>Security: >> >><matt> >>It's cool to see that the Spring Team has released 1.2 RC2, but there's a >>change that causes Acegi Security (v0.8.1) to fail. >> >>• refactored static PathMatcher class into PathMatcher interface and >>AntPathMatcher implementation >> >>This change seems to cause this issue with Acegi Security. Right now, I >>have Spring 1.2 RC1 and Hibernate 3.0.1 bundled into AppFuse 1.8. I was >>hoping to upgrade to Spring 1.2 RC2, but it doesn't look like this will >>work - unless the Acegi Team releases a new version that supports 1.2 RC2 >>(hint, hint ;-). </matt> >> >>I've refactored the static PathMatcher into a PathMatcher interface and >>AntPathMatcher implementation class, after repeated questions in that >>respect. I must admit I haven't really considered that other *libraries* >>might access that code, just that users might. >> >>Hence, I've accepted the tradeoff of backwards-incompatibility for 1.2, >>because it's easy enough for users to migrate affected code - and the >>utilities in Spring's util package are considered somewhat for internal >> >> >use > > >>in the first place. But unfortunately, there's the issue of collaborating >>libraries... >> >>Anyway, I would like to keep the refactored PathMatcher, so I'd like to >>encourage you to release an Acegi update release (0.8.2?) at your earliest >>convenience, ideally alongside Spring 1.2 final (in about two weeks) or >>earlier. Users should have a fully working combo then again. >> >>Sorry for the inconveniences caused, >> >>Juergen >> >> |
|
From: Mark St G. <stg...@ca...> - 2005-04-20 01:27:50
|
Hi Luke / Ben
Any idea when an official 0.9 or 0.8.2 Acegi build will be planned...
(I assume in the next few weeks to coincide with the Spring 1.2 release ?)
Cheers
Mark
Luke Taylor
<negaton@freesurf
.ch> To
Sent by: spr...@li...
springframework-d rceforge.net
eveloper-admin@li cc
sts.sourceforge.n
et Subject
Re: [Springframework-developer]
Spring 1.2 RC2 and Acegi Security
04/19/2005 05:30
PM
Please respond to
springframework-d
eveloper
Hi,
I discussed this with Ben the other night and the Acegi Maven build is
now building against a Spring daily snapshot (generated by the Spring
Maven build) so any inconsistencies will hopefully be detected right away.
I modified the Acegi code earlier today to use an explicit
AntPathMatcher to get the build working again. I don't think Ben will
have any worries about requiring Spring 1.2 for the next release but it
should be easy to accomodate either way.
Luke.
Juergen Hoeller wrote:
> Yes, there are essentially these two options: either require Spring 1.2
as
> of the next Acegi release (which should probably be called 0.9 then), or
> copy the old PathMatcher over. In the former case, Acegi should follow
the
> new Spring pattern there: components that need path-matching
functionality
> receive a PathMatcher implementation through dependency injection, using
an
> AntPathMatcher as default.
>
> BTW, it would be good to unify the codebases in the mid term, for example
> moving some of the generic Acegi utility stuff over to the main Spring
> codebase. IMO, we should do this for Acegi Security 1.0 at the latest,
with
> Acegi concentrating on the actual security support only. In any case, I
> guess it's inevitable to depend on a specific Spring release level at
some
> point.
>
> Juergen
>
>
--
Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd.
PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523C http://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime
info,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
|
|
From: <al...@in...> - 2005-04-19 22:34:57
|
View results here -> http://opensource.jteam.nl/build/buildresults/spring?log=log20050420001606Lbuild.249 |
|
From: Luke T. <ne...@fr...> - 2005-04-19 22:30:11
|
Hi, I discussed this with Ben the other night and the Acegi Maven build is now building against a Spring daily snapshot (generated by the Spring Maven build) so any inconsistencies will hopefully be detected right away. I modified the Acegi code earlier today to use an explicit AntPathMatcher to get the build working again. I don't think Ben will have any worries about requiring Spring 1.2 for the next release but it should be easy to accomodate either way. Luke. Juergen Hoeller wrote: > Yes, there are essentially these two options: either require Spring 1.2 as > of the next Acegi release (which should probably be called 0.9 then), or > copy the old PathMatcher over. In the former case, Acegi should follow the > new Spring pattern there: components that need path-matching functionality > receive a PathMatcher implementation through dependency injection, using an > AntPathMatcher as default. > > BTW, it would be good to unify the codebases in the mid term, for example > moving some of the generic Acegi utility stuff over to the main Spring > codebase. IMO, we should do this for Acegi Security 1.0 at the latest, with > Acegi concentrating on the actual security support only. In any case, I > guess it's inevitable to depend on a specific Spring release level at some > point. > > Juergen > > -- Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd. PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523C http://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk |
|
From: Juergen H. <ju...@in...> - 2005-04-19 21:07:27
|
Yes, there are essentially these two options: either require Spring 1.2 as of the next Acegi release (which should probably be called 0.9 then), or copy the old PathMatcher over. In the former case, Acegi should follow the new Spring pattern there: components that need path-matching functionality receive a PathMatcher implementation through dependency injection, using an AntPathMatcher as default. BTW, it would be good to unify the codebases in the mid term, for example moving some of the generic Acegi utility stuff over to the main Spring codebase. IMO, we should do this for Acegi Security 1.0 at the latest, with Acegi concentrating on the actual security support only. In any case, I guess it's inevitable to depend on a specific Spring release level at some point. Juergen -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of Andy Depue Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 10:52 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Spring 1.2 RC2 and Acegi Security I should note that I ran across this earlier and posted a patch to the Acegi developer's list (see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.springframework.acegisecurity.devel /864 ). I didn't officially submit this patch, as it breaks backward compatibility with Spring (it will only run with the very latest Spring). If a goal of the Acegi project is to maintain such compability, it will probably either want to remove the dependency (by copying the code into the Acegi project), or use reflection or other technique at runtime to dynamically adapt to the Spring version. - Andy On Tuesday 19 April 2005 12:11 pm, Juergen Hoeller wrote: > Hi Ben, > > as Matt has noticed, there is a change in Spring 1.2 RC2 that breaks Acegi > Security: > > <matt> > It's cool to see that the Spring Team has released 1.2 RC2, but there's a > change that causes Acegi Security (v0.8.1) to fail. > > refactored static PathMatcher class into PathMatcher interface and > AntPathMatcher implementation > > This change seems to cause this issue with Acegi Security. Right now, I > have Spring 1.2 RC1 and Hibernate 3.0.1 bundled into AppFuse 1.8. I was > hoping to upgrade to Spring 1.2 RC2, but it doesn't look like this will > work - unless the Acegi Team releases a new version that supports 1.2 RC2 > (hint, hint ;-). </matt> > > I've refactored the static PathMatcher into a PathMatcher interface and > AntPathMatcher implementation class, after repeated questions in that > respect. I must admit I haven't really considered that other *libraries* > might access that code, just that users might. > > Hence, I've accepted the tradeoff of backwards-incompatibility for 1.2, > because it's easy enough for users to migrate affected code - and the > utilities in Spring's util package are considered somewhat for internal use > in the first place. But unfortunately, there's the issue of collaborating > libraries... > > Anyway, I would like to keep the refactored PathMatcher, so I'd like to > encourage you to release an Acegi update release (0.8.2?) at your earliest > convenience, ideally alongside Spring 1.2 final (in about two weeks) or > earlier. Users should have a fully working combo then again. > > Sorry for the inconveniences caused, > > Juergen > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. > Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in > creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime > info, new features, or free trial, at: > http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info, new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Andy D. <an...@ma...> - 2005-04-19 20:52:32
|
I should note that I ran across this earlier and posted a patch to the Aceg= i=20 developer's list (see=20 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.springframework.acegisecurity.deve= l/864 ). =20 I didn't officially submit this patch, as it breaks backward compatibility= =20 with Spring (it will only run with the very latest Spring). If a goal of t= he=20 Acegi project is to maintain such compability, it will probably either want= =20 to remove the dependency (by copying the code into the Acegi project), or u= se=20 reflection or other technique at runtime to dynamically adapt to the Spring= =20 version. - Andy On Tuesday 19 April 2005 12:11 pm, Juergen Hoeller wrote: > Hi Ben, > > as Matt has noticed, there is a change in Spring 1.2 RC2 that breaks Acegi > Security: > > <matt> > It's cool to see that the Spring Team has released 1.2 RC2, but there's a > change that causes Acegi Security (v0.8.1) to fail. > > =95 refactored static PathMatcher class into PathMatcher interface and > AntPathMatcher implementation > > This change seems to cause this issue with Acegi Security. Right now, I > have Spring 1.2 RC1 and Hibernate 3.0.1 bundled into AppFuse 1.8. I was > hoping to upgrade to Spring 1.2 RC2, but it doesn't look like this will > work - unless the Acegi Team releases a new version that supports 1.2 RC2 > (hint, hint ;-). </matt> > > I've refactored the static PathMatcher into a PathMatcher interface and > AntPathMatcher implementation class, after repeated questions in that > respect. I must admit I haven't really considered that other *libraries* > might access that code, just that users might. > > Hence, I've accepted the tradeoff of backwards-incompatibility for 1.2, > because it's easy enough for users to migrate affected code - and the > utilities in Spring's util package are considered somewhat for internal u= se > in the first place. But unfortunately, there's the issue of collaborating > libraries... > > Anyway, I would like to keep the refactored PathMatcher, so I'd like to > encourage you to release an Acegi update release (0.8.2?) at your earliest > convenience, ideally alongside Spring 1.2 final (in about two weeks) or > earlier. Users should have a fully working combo then again. > > Sorry for the inconveniences caused, > > Juergen > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. > Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in > creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime > info, new features, or free trial, at: > http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Juergen H. <ju...@in...> - 2005-04-19 19:51:59
|
Well, if OpenSessionInViewFilter doesn't kick in for portlets, no other filter will kick in with portlets either. Isn't there maybe some general issue hiding there? Of course we can provide an OpenSessionInViewInterceptor for portlets, but I'm not sure whether that's actually a good fit there. The Portlet request flow with separate handle and render callbacks makes this less compelling. What we certainly can't do is let the existing OpenSessionInViewInterceptor implement some PortletControllerInterceptor interface. That would force every Servlet user to have the portlet.jar on the classpath. Juergen -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of Erwin Vervaet Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 9:26 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: [Springframework-developer] OpenSessionInView and portlet support Apparently the existing OSIV filter does not work with portlets: http://forum.springframework.org/viewtopic.php?t=4907 I guess we should tackle this issue when doing the Portlet support for 1.3. There is no PortletMVC category in JIRA so I'm not sure where to file it... Any input from the Porlet people? Erwin Vervaet erw...@er... ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info, new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Juergen H. <ju...@in...> - 2005-04-19 19:32:22
|
Everybody, Please report any other libraries that have issues with the refactored PathMatcher, or with any other changes in Spring 1.2 RC1/RC2. We should catch all of those before the 1.2 final release. If there are severe obstacles caused by this, we could also revert PathMatcher back to a static utility class, as of 1.2 final. I would really prefer to keep it as interface + implementation, though, which it should have been from the start, Juergen -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of Juergen Hoeller Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 9:11 PM To: ben...@ac... Cc: spr...@li... Subject: [Springframework-developer] Spring 1.2 RC2 and Acegi Security Hi Ben, as Matt has noticed, there is a change in Spring 1.2 RC2 that breaks Acegi Security: <matt> It's cool to see that the Spring Team has released 1.2 RC2, but there's a change that causes Acegi Security (v0.8.1) to fail. refactored static PathMatcher class into PathMatcher interface and AntPathMatcher implementation This change seems to cause this issue with Acegi Security. Right now, I have Spring 1.2 RC1 and Hibernate 3.0.1 bundled into AppFuse 1.8. I was hoping to upgrade to Spring 1.2 RC2, but it doesn't look like this will work - unless the Acegi Team releases a new version that supports 1.2 RC2 (hint, hint ;-). </matt> I've refactored the static PathMatcher into a PathMatcher interface and AntPathMatcher implementation class, after repeated questions in that respect. I must admit I haven't really considered that other *libraries* might access that code, just that users might. Hence, I've accepted the tradeoff of backwards-incompatibility for 1.2, because it's easy enough for users to migrate affected code - and the utilities in Spring's util package are considered somewhat for internal use in the first place. But unfortunately, there's the issue of collaborating libraries... Anyway, I would like to keep the refactored PathMatcher, so I'd like to encourage you to release an Acegi update release (0.8.2?) at your earliest convenience, ideally alongside Spring 1.2 final (in about two weeks) or earlier. Users should have a fully working combo then again. Sorry for the inconveniences caused, Juergen ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info, new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Erwin V. <erw...@er...> - 2005-04-19 19:23:38
|
Apparently the existing OSIV filter does not work with portlets: http://forum.springframework.org/viewtopic.php?t=4907 I guess we should tackle this issue when doing the Portlet support for 1.3. There is no PortletMVC category in JIRA so I'm not sure where to file it... Any input from the Porlet people? Erwin Vervaet erw...@er... |
|
From: Juergen H. <ju...@in...> - 2005-04-19 19:12:32
|
Hi Ben, as Matt has noticed, there is a change in Spring 1.2 RC2 that breaks Acegi Security: <matt> It's cool to see that the Spring Team has released 1.2 RC2, but there's a change that causes Acegi Security (v0.8.1) to fail. refactored static PathMatcher class into PathMatcher interface and AntPathMatcher implementation This change seems to cause this issue with Acegi Security. Right now, I have Spring 1.2 RC1 and Hibernate 3.0.1 bundled into AppFuse 1.8. I was hoping to upgrade to Spring 1.2 RC2, but it doesn't look like this will work - unless the Acegi Team releases a new version that supports 1.2 RC2 (hint, hint ;-). </matt> I've refactored the static PathMatcher into a PathMatcher interface and AntPathMatcher implementation class, after repeated questions in that respect. I must admit I haven't really considered that other *libraries* might access that code, just that users might. Hence, I've accepted the tradeoff of backwards-incompatibility for 1.2, because it's easy enough for users to migrate affected code - and the utilities in Spring's util package are considered somewhat for internal use in the first place. But unfortunately, there's the issue of collaborating libraries... Anyway, I would like to keep the refactored PathMatcher, so I'd like to encourage you to release an Acegi update release (0.8.2?) at your earliest convenience, ideally alongside Spring 1.2 final (in about two weeks) or earlier. Users should have a fully working combo then again. Sorry for the inconveniences caused, Juergen |
|
From: Rob H. <ro...@ca...> - 2005-04-19 18:46:44
|
I'm not that familiar with Commons Validator myself and I was wondering how that worked. I will be adding in validator-rules.xml and making the appropriate changes so that it works with the Spring Modules FieldChecks class. Rob Matt Raible wrote: > > On Apr 19, 2005, at 9:48 AM, Rob Harrop wrote: > >> >> Matt, >> >> Spring Modules 0.1 is going out to tomorrow we reworked Commons >> Validator support. I would certainly appreciate your feedback on it >> when you get a chance to us it. > > > I updated from CVS and tried it - incorporating the changes listed in > changelog.txt. Here's what I had to change to migrate from the > previous version (which mainly required package-name changes). > > BeanValidator -> DefaultBeanValidator > Remove init-method attribute from ValidatorFactory > Change "resources" property on ValidatorFactory to > "validationConfigLocations" > > Everything seems to work great. Are there any additional changes you > plan on making before the 0.1 release? > > One thing I noticed in Validator 1.1.3 is that much of the JavaScript > is generated from code inside the JAR, rather than a > validator-rules.xml file. I'm guessing validator-rules.xml is still > required for Spring integration? Yep, answered my own question: > leaving it out results in: > > java.lang.NullPointerException: Depends string "required" was not > found in validator-rules.xml. > at > org.springmodules.commons.validator.taglib.JavascriptValidatorTag.doStar > tTag(JavascriptValidatorTag.java:334) > > Maybe this file should be included in the release somehow - or we > should figure out a way to override the JavaScript that's generated > from inside commons-validator.jar? The guys on the validator list > are pretty friendly, so I'm guessing they'd be willing to help out > with this. > > Matt > >> >> Rob >> >> >> From: spr...@li... >> [mailto:spr...@li...] On >> Behalf Of Matt Raible >> Sent: 19 April 2005 17:04 >> To: spr...@li... >> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Where does webflow live? >> >> >> So what's the recommended strategy here? Do you guys recommend I >> drop spring-sandbox.jar from AppFuse/Equinox and use the >> springmodules version of Commons Validator support? My guess is "yes". >> >> It would be nice if there was a release of the validator support on >> java.net?. Is it possible to publish a 1.0 version of the validator >> JAR? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matt >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. > Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in > creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime > info, > new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > |
|
From: Matt R. <li...@ra...> - 2005-04-19 18:14:53
|
On Apr 19, 2005, at 9:48 AM, Rob Harrop wrote: > > Matt, > =A0 > Spring Modules 0.1 is going out to tomorrow we reworked Commons =20 > Validator support. I would certainly appreciate your feedback on it =20= > when you get a chance to us it. I updated from CVS and tried it - incorporating the changes listed in =20= changelog.txt. Here's what I had to change to migrate from the =20 previous version (which mainly required package-name changes). BeanValidator -> DefaultBeanValidator Remove init-method attribute from ValidatorFactory Change "resources" property on ValidatorFactory to =20 "validationConfigLocations" Everything seems to work great. Are there any additional changes you =20= plan on making before the 0.1 release? One thing I noticed in Validator 1.1.3 is that much of the JavaScript =20= is generated from code inside the JAR, rather than a =20 validator-rules.xml file. I'm guessing validator-rules.xml is still =20 required for Spring integration? Yep, answered my own question: leaving =20= it out results in: java.lang.NullPointerException: Depends string "required" was not found =20= in validator-rules.xml. at =20 org.springmodules.commons.validator.taglib.JavascriptValidatorTag.doStar=20= tTag(JavascriptValidatorTag.java:334) Maybe this file should be included in the release somehow - or we =20 should figure out a way to override the JavaScript that's generated =20 from inside commons-validator.jar? The guys on the validator list are =20= pretty friendly, so I'm guessing they'd be willing to help out with =20 this. Matt > =A0 > Rob > =A0 > > From: spr...@li... =20 > [mailto:spr...@li...] On =20 > Behalf Of Matt Raible > Sent: 19 April 2005 17:04 > To: spr...@li... > Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Where does webflow live? > =A0 > > So what's the recommended strategy here? Do you guys recommend I drop =20= > spring-sandbox.jar from AppFuse/Equinox and use the springmodules =20 > version of Commons Validator support? My guess is "yes". > > It would be nice if there was a release of the validator support on =20= > java.net?. Is it possible to publish a 1.0 version of the validator =20= > JAR? > > Thanks, > > Matt > |
|
From: Rob H. <rob...@in...> - 2005-04-19 16:48:22
|
Matt, Spring Modules 0.1 is going out to tomorrow we reworked Commons Validator support. I would certainly appreciate your feedback on it when you get a chance to us it. Rob _____ From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf Of Matt Raible Sent: 19 April 2005 17:04 To: spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Where does webflow live? So what's the recommended strategy here? Do you guys recommend I drop spring-sandbox.jar from AppFuse/Equinox and use the springmodules version of Commons Validator support? My guess is "yes". It would be nice if there was a release of the validator support on java.net?. Is it possible to publish a 1.0 version of the validator JAR? Thanks, Matt On Apr 14, 2005, at 4:23 PM, Matt Raible wrote: I checked and I have the latest stuff from CVS, but I did have last night's and today's JARs in my deployed app. ;-) All seems to work fine now - nice job! Matt On Apr 14, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Thomas Risberg wrote: Matt, Are you using the most recent version from CVS - I got the same error yesterday - it was due to a refactoring misstake in the following line in DefaultValidatorFactory: private static final String ERRORS_KEY = "org.springframework.validation.Errors"; the ERRORS_KEY was wrong so the null pointer exception was from a missing error object. I did however fix it last night and my local tests run fine. Thomas On Apr 14, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Matt Raible wrote: Client-side validation seems to work fine, but not server side. Here's the error: ERROR - ValidatorAction.executeValidationMethod(602) | Unhandled exception thrown during validation: null java.lang.NullPointerException at org.springmodules.commons.validator.Resources.rejectValue(Resources.java:66) at org.springmodules.commons.validator.FieldChecks.validateRequired(FieldChecks .java:87) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39 ) Matt On Apr 14, 2005, at 9:00 AM, Thomas Risberg wrote: Matt, I forgot the tld -- I have added it to the build. I changed the uri back to http://www.springmodules.org/tags/commons-validator - same as before except for the domain name. Thanks for testing it :) Thomas On Apr 14, 2005, at 12:40 AM, Matt Raible wrote: I tried it and the springmodules-validator-dev-20050413.jar seems to be missing the taglib.tld in the META-INF directory. I built the project using "ant alljars". 0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:46 MDT 2005 META-INF/ 217 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 META-INF/MANIFEST.MF 0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/ 0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/ 0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/commons/ 0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/commons/validator/ 0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/commons/validator/taglib/ 2392 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/commons/validator/BeanValidator.class 4596 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/commons/validator/DefaultValidatorFactory.class 11261 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/commons/validator/FieldChecks.class 3404 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/commons/validator/NamedBeanValidator.class 4625 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/commons/validator/Resources.class 2974 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/commons/validator/ValidatorAdaptor.class 446 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/commons/validator/ValidatorFactory.class 1305 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/commons/validator/taglib/JavascriptValidatorTag$1.class 13579 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/commons/validator/taglib/JavascriptValidatorTag.class This results in the following error: org.apache.jasper.JasperException: /index.jsp(1,1) The absolute uri: http://www.springmodules.org/tags/spring-commons-validator cannot be resolved in either web.xml or the jar files deployed with this application at org.apache.jasper.compiler.DefaultErrorHandler.jspError(DefaultErrorHandler. java:39) BTW, is there any way to have a shorter URI - something like http://www.springmodules.org/tags/validator? Thanks, Matt On Apr 13, 2005, at 8:46 PM, Thomas Risberg wrote: I have moved the Commons Validator support over to springmodules. I did not make any changes other than the package names and copyright/license notices. There are quite a few deprecated methods - I guess some of the code is for an older version. The new package name is org.springmodules.commons.validator and the new uri for the taglib is http://www.springmodules.org/tags/spring-commons-validator Matt, since you seem to be the primary user of this support, could you check the new code out and test it? Thomas On Apr 13, 2005, at 5:40 PM, Rob Harrop wrote: Thomas, If you are willing to work on it, I am happy for you to move it to Spring Modules now. I don't see any harm in including what is there in a 0.1 release if you are happy with it. Rob On 13 Apr 2005, at 20:52, tho...@tr... wrote: Rob, I'm currently working on a project where I will use Commons Validator outside of a Web MVC environment. I still would like to be able to wire it up using Spring and I have been playing around with what's in the sandbox. I have already changed the package names, so let me know when/if it is a good time to move this to springmodules CVS. I moved most of it to org.springmodules.validation.commons package except for the tag library which I put in org.springmodules.web.servlet.tags.validation.commons. I guess it makes sense to keep the package structure in org.springmodules the same as org.springframework so it's easier to move code between the projects. Thomas Quoting Rob Harrop <rob...@in...>: Well, I'll spend some time going through the sandbox and see what I think is a candidate for Spring Modules. I'll post the suggestions here and if everyone is happy I'll do the move. We have about 6 active developers on SM who are not core Spring devs, plus there is me so we may be able to breath some live back into the stuff in the sandbox. Rob -- Rob Harrop Interface21 - Spring Services from the Source http://www.springframework.com -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf Of Juergen Hoeller Sent: 12 April 2005 22:17 To: spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Where does webflow live? Ah, our favorite topic once again ;-) I'm not entirely sure whether Web Flow will get its own module; could be too fine-granular. The binding framework quite certainly shouldn't, which would already cause a problem with Web Flow's current status if we had modules. To give some numbers: If we want to have the binding framework, JCA support, Hibernate support, Web Flow, etc as separate modules (which would be necessary to get your desired effect of not putting any early-access stuff in the sandbox), we would end up with at least 35 modules (that's our top-level packages plus some subpackages of relevant size). Frankly, I consider that a horror scenario in terms of management and would strongly vote against it. I guess what I'm saying is that modules only *look* convincingly easy, but won't be a general solution for the early access problem in practice. Keith, please try to imagine this in detail and don't just consider it as solution upfront. This is absolutely non-trivial when looking at the details. Before we continue to spread the word on modules, I'd like to see concrete suggestions for module separation, respecting the interdependencies outlined in section 3 of our readme. I have already tried multiple times to nail down some options, and have always failed to find a convincing separation. The current jar files (12) might be a starting point, but I'm not sure that they can serve as module granularity too... Some packages are joined together there rather arbitrarily (from a source module perspective), for example the ones in spring-support.jar, or the separation between spring-orm.jar (which includes the entire ORM support except for Hibernate) and spring-hibernate.jar. Those jar files cannot be mapped 1-to-1 to source modules. So in total, it's unclear to me how a concrete module separation could look like (the more I look at it, the harder it seems). I doubt that we can resolve this within the 1.3 timeframe, given that we have such an aggressive schedule there, with just two months for multiple major new features. Anyway, the real problem here is the sandbox, IMO. There's too much stuff in there, both dead and somewhat alive. Noone should have to rely on spring-sandbox.jar!! Everything that's of some use in there should move, either to the core or to Spring Modules. Juergen -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of Keith Donald Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 9:24 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Where does webflow live? Aye, this is exactly why we need a modular CVS structure and a smarter build, which Colin is leading up in the post 1.2 timeframe. Web flow is currently maintained in the sandbox, yes. This means it is also included in spring-sandbox.jar when the 'sandboxjar' target is run. Independent of that fact, the webflow.release target ships spring-webflow.jar and spring-webflow-support.jar, pulling in _just_ the required code from the sandbox needed to run spring webflow. So, I guess you can say we've taken the stance that people aren't developing apps with spring-sandbox.jar in their classpath. Hmm... In any case, in the future spring-webflow will be in its own module with its own distributable, along side other well-defined core modules, and the sandbox will die the death it deserves (or be only used for true 'scratch' stuff) Keith -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf Of Matt Raible Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 3:04 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: [Springframework-developer] Where does webflow live? I ran into some issues last night with spring-sandbox.jar from Spring 1.2 RC1 and Spring Web Flow PR2. The problem turned out to be that many of the flow classes where already in my spring-sandbox.jar. Once I deleted them from spring-sandbox.jar, everything worked fine. How do I eliminate this duplication in the future? Is the web flow stuff in spring-sandbox.jar? The main reason I'm using the sandbox JAR is for Commons Validator. Thanks, Matt ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer -- Rob Harrop Interface21 - Spring Services from the Source http://www.springframework.com Lead Developer - AOP & JMX, Spring Framework: http://www.springframework.org Author, "Pro Spring" (February 2005, with Jan Machacek). http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1590594614/ Author, "Pro Jakarta Velocity" (August 2004). http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/159059410X/ Author, "Pro Jakarta Struts" (March 2004, with John Carnell). http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/159059228X/ ____________________________________________________ Interface21 Limited Registered Office Summit House, 2-2a Highfield Road, Dartford, Kent DA1 2JY Registered in England and Wales No. 5187766 ____________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Matt R. <li...@ra...> - 2005-04-19 16:04:02
|
So what's the recommended strategy here? Do you guys recommend I drop spring-sandbox.jar from AppFuse/Equinox and use the springmodules version of Commons Validator support? My guess is "yes". It would be nice if there was a release of the validator support on java.net?. Is it possible to publish a 1.0 version of the validator JAR? Thanks, Matt On Apr 14, 2005, at 4:23 PM, Matt Raible wrote: > I checked and I have the latest stuff from CVS, but I did have last > night's and today's JARs in my deployed app. ;-) All seems to work > fine now - nice job! > > Matt > > On Apr 14, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Thomas Risberg wrote: > >> Matt, >> >> Are you using the most recent version from CVS - I got the same error >> yesterday - it was due to a refactoring misstake in the following >> line in DefaultValidatorFactory: >> >> private static final String ERRORS_KEY = >> "org.springframework.validation.Errors"; >> >> >> >> the ERRORS_KEY was wrong so the null pointer exception was from a >> missing error object. I did however fix it last night and my local >> tests run fine. >> >> Thomas >> >> >> On Apr 14, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Matt Raible wrote: >> >>> Client-side validation seems to work fine, but not server side. >>> Here's the error: >>> >>> ERROR - ValidatorAction.executeValidationMethod(602) | Unhandled >>> exception thrown during validation: null >>> java.lang.NullPointerException >>> at >>> org.springmodules.commons.validator.Resources.rejectValue(Resources.j >>> ava:66) >>> at >>> org.springmodules.commons.validator.FieldChecks.validateRequired(Fiel >>> dChecks.java:87) >>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native >>> Method) >>> at >>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl. >>> java:39) >>> >>> Matt >>> >>> >>> On Apr 14, 2005, at 9:00 AM, Thomas Risberg wrote: >>> >>>> Matt, >>>> >>>> I forgot the tld -- I have added it to the build. I changed the >>>> uri back to http://www.springmodules.org/tags/commons-validator - >>>> same as before except for the domain name. >>>> >>>> Thanks for testing it :) >>>> >>>> Thomas >>>> >>>> >>>> On Apr 14, 2005, at 12:40 AM, Matt Raible wrote: >>>> >>>>> I tried it and the springmodules-validator-dev-20050413.jar seems >>>>> to be missing the taglib.tld in the META-INF directory. I built >>>>> the project using "ant alljars". >>>>> >>>>> 0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:46 MDT 2005 META-INF/ >>>>> 217 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 META-INF/MANIFEST.MF >>>>> 0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/ >>>>> 0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/ >>>>> 0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 org/springmodules/commons/ >>>>> 0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 >>>>> org/springmodules/commons/validator/ >>>>> 0 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 >>>>> org/springmodules/commons/validator/taglib/ >>>>> 2392 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 >>>>> org/springmodules/commons/validator/BeanValidator.class >>>>> 4596 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 >>>>> org/springmodules/commons/validator/DefaultValidatorFactory.class >>>>> 11261 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 >>>>> org/springmodules/commons/validator/FieldChecks.class >>>>> 3404 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 >>>>> org/springmodules/commons/validator/NamedBeanValidator.class >>>>> 4625 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 >>>>> org/springmodules/commons/validator/Resources.class >>>>> 2974 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 >>>>> org/springmodules/commons/validator/ValidatorAdaptor.class >>>>> 446 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 >>>>> org/springmodules/commons/validator/ValidatorFactory.class >>>>> 1305 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 >>>>> org/springmodules/commons/validator/taglib/ >>>>> JavascriptValidatorTag$1.class >>>>> 13579 Wed Apr 13 22:12:44 MDT 2005 >>>>> org/springmodules/commons/validator/taglib/ >>>>> JavascriptValidatorTag.class >>>>> >>>>> This results in the following error: >>>>> >>>>> org.apache.jasper.JasperException: /index.jsp(1,1) The absolute >>>>> uri: http://www.springmodules.org/tags/spring-commons-validator >>>>> cannot be resolved in either web.xml or the jar files deployed >>>>> with this application >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.jasper.compiler.DefaultErrorHandler.jspError(DefaultErro >>>>> rHandler.java:39) >>>>> >>>>> BTW, is there any way to have a shorter URI - something like >>>>> http://www.springmodules.org/tags/validator? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Matt >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 13, 2005, at 8:46 PM, Thomas Risberg wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I have moved the Commons Validator support over to springmodules. >>>>>> I did not make any changes other than the package names and >>>>>> copyright/license notices. There are quite a few deprecated >>>>>> methods - I guess some of the code is for an older version. >>>>>> >>>>>> The new package name is org.springmodules.commons.validator >>>>>> and the new uri for the taglib is >>>>>> http://www.springmodules.org/tags/spring-commons-validator >>>>>> >>>>>> Matt, since you seem to be the primary user of this support, >>>>>> could you check the new code out and test it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thomas >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 13, 2005, at 5:40 PM, Rob Harrop wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thomas, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you are willing to work on it, I am happy for you to move it >>>>>>> to Spring Modules now. I don't see any harm in including what is >>>>>>> there in a 0.1 release if you are happy with it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rob >>>>>>> On 13 Apr 2005, at 20:52, tho...@tr... wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rob, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm currently working on a project where I will use Commons >>>>>>>> Validator outside of >>>>>>>> a Web MVC environment. I still would like to be able to wire >>>>>>>> it up using Spring >>>>>>>> and I have been playing around with what's in the sandbox. I >>>>>>>> have already >>>>>>>> changed the package names, so let me know when/if it is a good >>>>>>>> time to move >>>>>>>> this to springmodules CVS. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I moved most of it to org.springmodules.validation.commons >>>>>>>> package except for >>>>>>>> the tag library which I put in >>>>>>>> org.springmodules.web.servlet.tags.validation.commons. I guess >>>>>>>> it makes sense >>>>>>>> to keep the package structure in org.springmodules the same as >>>>>>>> org.springframework so it's easier to move code between the >>>>>>>> projects. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thomas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Quoting Rob Harrop <rob...@in...>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well, I'll spend some time going through the sandbox and see >>>>>>>>> what I think is >>>>>>>>> a candidate for Spring Modules. I'll post the suggestions here >>>>>>>>> and if >>>>>>>>> everyone is happy I'll do the move. We have about 6 active >>>>>>>>> developers on SM >>>>>>>>> who are not core Spring devs, plus there is me so we may be >>>>>>>>> able to breath >>>>>>>>> some live back into the stuff in the sandbox. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rob >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Rob Harrop >>>>>>>>> Interface21 - Spring Services from the Source >>>>>>>>> http://www.springframework.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>> From: spr...@li... >>>>>>>>> [mailto:spr...@li...] >>>>>>>>> On Behalf Of >>>>>>>>> Juergen Hoeller >>>>>>>>> Sent: 12 April 2005 22:17 >>>>>>>>> To: spr...@li... >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Where does webflow >>>>>>>>> live? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ah, our favorite topic once again ;-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm not entirely sure whether Web Flow will get its own >>>>>>>>> module; could be too >>>>>>>>> fine-granular. The binding framework quite certainly >>>>>>>>> shouldn't, which would >>>>>>>>> already cause a problem with Web Flow's current status if we >>>>>>>>> had modules. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To give some numbers: If we want to have the binding >>>>>>>>> framework, JCA support, >>>>>>>>> Hibernate support, Web Flow, etc as separate modules (which >>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>> necessary to get your desired effect of not putting any >>>>>>>>> early-access stuff >>>>>>>>> in the sandbox), we would end up with at least 35 modules >>>>>>>>> (that's our >>>>>>>>> top-level packages plus some subpackages of relevant size). >>>>>>>>> Frankly, I >>>>>>>>> consider that a horror scenario in terms of management and >>>>>>>>> would strongly >>>>>>>>> vote against it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I guess what I'm saying is that modules only *look* >>>>>>>>> convincingly easy, but >>>>>>>>> won't be a general solution for the early access problem in >>>>>>>>> practice. Keith, >>>>>>>>> please try to imagine this in detail and don't just consider >>>>>>>>> it as solution >>>>>>>>> upfront. This is absolutely non-trivial when looking at the >>>>>>>>> details. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Before we continue to spread the word on modules, I'd like to >>>>>>>>> see concrete >>>>>>>>> suggestions for module separation, respecting the >>>>>>>>> interdependencies outlined >>>>>>>>> in section 3 of our readme. I have already tried multiple >>>>>>>>> times to nail down >>>>>>>>> some options, and have always failed to find a convincing >>>>>>>>> separation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The current jar files (12) might be a starting point, but I'm >>>>>>>>> not sure that >>>>>>>>> they can serve as module granularity too... Some packages are >>>>>>>>> joined >>>>>>>>> together there rather arbitrarily (from a source module >>>>>>>>> perspective), for >>>>>>>>> example the ones in spring-support.jar, or the separation >>>>>>>>> between >>>>>>>>> spring-orm.jar (which includes the entire ORM support except >>>>>>>>> for Hibernate) >>>>>>>>> and spring-hibernate.jar. Those jar files cannot be mapped >>>>>>>>> 1-to-1 to source >>>>>>>>> modules. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So in total, it's unclear to me how a concrete module >>>>>>>>> separation could look >>>>>>>>> like (the more I look at it, the harder it seems). I doubt >>>>>>>>> that we can >>>>>>>>> resolve this within the 1.3 timeframe, given that we have such >>>>>>>>> an aggressive >>>>>>>>> schedule there, with just two months for multiple major new >>>>>>>>> features. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Anyway, the real problem here is the sandbox, IMO. There's too >>>>>>>>> much stuff in >>>>>>>>> there, both dead and somewhat alive. Noone should have to rely >>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>> spring-sandbox.jar!! Everything that's of some use in there >>>>>>>>> should move, >>>>>>>>> either to the core or to Spring Modules. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Juergen >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>> From: spr...@li... >>>>>>>>> [mailto:springframework-developer- >>>>>>>>> ad...@li...]On Behalf >>>>>>>>> Of Keith Donald >>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 9:24 PM >>>>>>>>> To: spr...@li... >>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Where does webflow >>>>>>>>> live? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Aye, this is exactly why we need a modular CVS structure and a >>>>>>>>> smarter >>>>>>>>> build, which Colin is leading up in the post 1.2 timeframe. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Web flow is currently maintained in the sandbox, yes. This >>>>>>>>> means it is also >>>>>>>>> included in spring-sandbox.jar when the 'sandboxjar' target is >>>>>>>>> run. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Independent of that fact, the webflow.release target ships >>>>>>>>> spring-webflow.jar and spring-webflow-support.jar, pulling in >>>>>>>>> _just_ the >>>>>>>>> required code from the sandbox needed to run spring webflow. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So, I guess you can say we've taken the stance that people >>>>>>>>> aren't developing >>>>>>>>> apps with spring-sandbox.jar in their classpath. Hmm... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In any case, in the future spring-webflow will be in its own >>>>>>>>> module with its >>>>>>>>> own distributable, along side other well-defined core modules, >>>>>>>>> and the >>>>>>>>> sandbox will die the death it deserves (or be only used for >>>>>>>>> true 'scratch' >>>>>>>>> stuff) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Keith >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>> From: spr...@li... >>>>>>>>> [mailto:spr...@li...] >>>>>>>>> On Behalf Of >>>>>>>>> Matt Raible >>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 3:04 PM >>>>>>>>> To: spr...@li... >>>>>>>>> Subject: [Springframework-developer] Where does webflow live? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I ran into some issues last night with spring-sandbox.jar from >>>>>>>>> Spring >>>>>>>>> 1.2 RC1 and Spring Web Flow PR2. The problem turned out to be >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> many of the flow classes where already in my >>>>>>>>> spring-sandbox.jar. Once >>>>>>>>> I deleted them from spring-sandbox.jar, everything worked >>>>>>>>> fine. How do >>>>>>>>> I eliminate this duplication in the future? Is the web flow >>>>>>>>> stuff in >>>>>>>>> spring-sandbox.jar? The main reason I'm using the sandbox JAR >>>>>>>>> is for >>>>>>>>> Commons Validator. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Matt >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>>>>>>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from >>>>>>>>> real users. >>>>>>>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start >>>>>>>>> reading now. >>>>>>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Springframework-developer mailing list >>>>>>>>> Spr...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework- >>>>>>>>> developer >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>>>>>>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from >>>>>>>>> real users. >>>>>>>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start >>>>>>>>> reading now. >>>>>>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Springframework-developer mailing list >>>>>>>>> Spr...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework- >>>>>>>>> developer >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>>>>>>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from >>>>>>>>> real users. >>>>>>>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start >>>>>>>>> reading now. >>>>>>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Springframework-developer mailing list >>>>>>>>> Spr...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework- >>>>>>>>> developer >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>>>>>>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from >>>>>>>>> real users. >>>>>>>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start >>>>>>>>> reading now. >>>>>>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Springframework-developer mailing list >>>>>>>>> Spr...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework- >>>>>>>>> developer >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>>>>>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from >>>>>>>> real users. >>>>>>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start >>>>>>>> reading now. >>>>>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Springframework-developer mailing list >>>>>>>> Spr...@li... >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework- >>>>>>>> developer >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Rob Harrop >>>>>>> Interface21 - Spring Services from the Source >>>>>>> http://www.springframework.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lead Developer - AOP & JMX, Spring Framework: >>>>>>> http://www.springframework.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Author, "Pro Spring" >>>>>>> (February 2005, with Jan Machacek). >>>>>>> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1590594614/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Author, "Pro Jakarta Velocity" >>>>>>> (August 2004). >>>>>>> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/159059410X/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Author, "Pro Jakarta Struts" >>>>>>> (March 2004, with John Carnell). >>>>>>> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/159059228X/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ____________________________________________________ >>>>>>> Interface21 Limited >>>>>>> Registered Office Summit House, 2-2a Highfield Road, Dartford, >>>>>>> Kent DA1 2JY >>>>>>> Registered in England and Wales No. 5187766 >>>>>>> ____________________________________________________ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>>>>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from >>>>>>> real users. >>>>>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading >>>>>>> now. >>>>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Springframework-developer mailing list >>>>>>> Spr...@li... >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework- >>>>>>> developer >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>>>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real >>>>>> users. >>>>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading >>>>>> now. >>>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Springframework-developer mailing list >>>>>> Spr...@li... >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework- >>>>>> developer >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real >>>>> users. >>>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading >>>>> now. >>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Springframework-developer mailing list >>>>> Spr...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework- >>>>> developer >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real >>>> users. >>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading >>>> now. >>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Springframework-developer mailing list >>>> Spr...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework- >>>> developer >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real >>> users. >>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Springframework-developer mailing list >>> Spr...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework- >>> developer >>> >>> |
|
From: Juergen H. <ju...@in...> - 2005-04-19 14:26:36
|
Dear Spring developers, Please have a look at the current JIRA issues for 1.2 final. If you find anything in there that's assigned to you but unlikely to be finished within the next two weeks, please move the issue it to a later milestone (or close it if you don't intend to address it at all). A lot of those issues are doc issues, actually. I have been moving them along for a while now, some of them since January. I would particularly appreciate any work on those doc issues, to finally get them done for 1.2 final. Else, feel free to move them to 1.2.1 or 1.3 RC1, according to your plans. Cheers, Juergen |
|
From: Thomas R. <tho...@tr...> - 2005-04-19 01:52:42
|
JavaDocs are done - are we ever going to automate this :) Thomas On Apr 18, 2005, at 9:39 PM, Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > I updated the docs, and posted notices on the forums and > springframework.com. So the JavaDocs are all that is left. > > Colin > > Thomas Risberg wrote: > >> I updated the home page and the news page - will do the api docs as >> soon as my download completes. >> >> Thomas >> >> >> On Apr 18, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Juergen Hoeller wrote: >> >>> I'm pleased to announce that Spring 1.2 RC2 has just been released. >>> >>> This release introduces one major new feature: >>> >>> * support for JCA's Common Client Interface (CCI), including support >>> for CCI >>> local transactions >>> >>> Furthermore, there are various minor enhancements, for example: >>> >>> * deprecated ListableBeanFactory's "getBeanDefinitionNames(type)", >>> in favor >>> of "getBeanNamesForType" >>> * added "value"/"value-ref" shortcut attributes to XML "entry" tag >>> for maps >>> * added "alias" root element for XML bean definition files, for >>> aliases for >>> beans in other files >>> >>> * JdbcAccessor lazily initializes the SQLExceptionTranslator by >>> default now >>> * added further configuration options to LocalSessionFactoryBean for >>> Hibernate3 >>> * added "defaultDestinationName" property to JmsTemplate, for a >>> dynamic >>> default destination >>> >>> * refined Resource support for compatibility with JDK 1.3's classic >>> VM and >>> with JRockit's jar paths >>> * refactored static PathMatcher class into PathMatcher interface and >>> AntPathMatcher implementation >>> * added ConfigurableMimeFileTypeMap, with extensive MIME type >>> mappings >>> out-of-the-box >>> >>> * added "context.i18n" package, with LocaleContext abstraction and >>> global >>> LocaleContextHolder >>> * DispatcherServlet exposes the current LocaleResolver through the >>> global >>> LocaleContextHolder >>> * added RemoteInvocationTraceInterceptor, logging remote calls and >>> exceptions on the server >>> >>> * updated JasperReports support for JR 0.6.6, using >>> JRDefaultCompiler as >>> default report compiler >>> * reworked AbstractJasperReportsView to work on JasperPrint instance >>> rather >>> than JasperReport instance >>> * added support for reports with embedded SQL statements to >>> AbstractJasperReportsView >>> >>> For a detailed list of enhancements and bug fixes, see the changelog. >>> >>> This release candidate is considered stable and recommended for >>> development >>> use. We expect Spring 1.2 final to be released in about two weeks. >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. >> Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in >> creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free >> runtime info, >> new features, or free trial, at: >> http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 >> _______________________________________________ >> Springframework-developer mailing list >> Spr...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > -- > Colin Sampaleanu > Interface21 Principal Consultant > Spring Training, Consulting and Support - "From the Source" > http://www.springframework.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. > Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in > creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime > info, > new features, or free trial, at: > http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2005-04-19 01:40:03
|
I updated the docs, and posted notices on the forums and springframework.com. So the JavaDocs are all that is left. Colin Thomas Risberg wrote: > I updated the home page and the news page - will do the api docs as > soon as my download completes. > > Thomas > > > On Apr 18, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Juergen Hoeller wrote: > >> I'm pleased to announce that Spring 1.2 RC2 has just been released. >> >> This release introduces one major new feature: >> >> * support for JCA's Common Client Interface (CCI), including support >> for CCI >> local transactions >> >> Furthermore, there are various minor enhancements, for example: >> >> * deprecated ListableBeanFactory's "getBeanDefinitionNames(type)", in >> favor >> of "getBeanNamesForType" >> * added "value"/"value-ref" shortcut attributes to XML "entry" tag >> for maps >> * added "alias" root element for XML bean definition files, for >> aliases for >> beans in other files >> >> * JdbcAccessor lazily initializes the SQLExceptionTranslator by >> default now >> * added further configuration options to LocalSessionFactoryBean for >> Hibernate3 >> * added "defaultDestinationName" property to JmsTemplate, for a dynamic >> default destination >> >> * refined Resource support for compatibility with JDK 1.3's classic >> VM and >> with JRockit's jar paths >> * refactored static PathMatcher class into PathMatcher interface and >> AntPathMatcher implementation >> * added ConfigurableMimeFileTypeMap, with extensive MIME type mappings >> out-of-the-box >> >> * added "context.i18n" package, with LocaleContext abstraction and >> global >> LocaleContextHolder >> * DispatcherServlet exposes the current LocaleResolver through the >> global >> LocaleContextHolder >> * added RemoteInvocationTraceInterceptor, logging remote calls and >> exceptions on the server >> >> * updated JasperReports support for JR 0.6.6, using JRDefaultCompiler as >> default report compiler >> * reworked AbstractJasperReportsView to work on JasperPrint instance >> rather >> than JasperReport instance >> * added support for reports with embedded SQL statements to >> AbstractJasperReportsView >> >> For a detailed list of enhancements and bug fixes, see the changelog. >> >> This release candidate is considered stable and recommended for >> development >> use. We expect Spring 1.2 final to be released in about two weeks. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. > Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in > creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime > info, > new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer -- Colin Sampaleanu Interface21 Principal Consultant Spring Training, Consulting and Support - "From the Source" http://www.springframework.com |
|
From: Thomas R. <tho...@tr...> - 2005-04-19 01:33:51
|
I updated the home page and the news page - will do the api docs as soon as my download completes. Thomas On Apr 18, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Juergen Hoeller wrote: > I'm pleased to announce that Spring 1.2 RC2 has just been released. > > This release introduces one major new feature: > > * support for JCA's Common Client Interface (CCI), including support > for CCI > local transactions > > Furthermore, there are various minor enhancements, for example: > > * deprecated ListableBeanFactory's "getBeanDefinitionNames(type)", in > favor > of "getBeanNamesForType" > * added "value"/"value-ref" shortcut attributes to XML "entry" tag for > maps > * added "alias" root element for XML bean definition files, for > aliases for > beans in other files > > * JdbcAccessor lazily initializes the SQLExceptionTranslator by > default now > * added further configuration options to LocalSessionFactoryBean for > Hibernate3 > * added "defaultDestinationName" property to JmsTemplate, for a dynamic > default destination > > * refined Resource support for compatibility with JDK 1.3's classic VM > and > with JRockit's jar paths > * refactored static PathMatcher class into PathMatcher interface and > AntPathMatcher implementation > * added ConfigurableMimeFileTypeMap, with extensive MIME type mappings > out-of-the-box > > * added "context.i18n" package, with LocaleContext abstraction and > global > LocaleContextHolder > * DispatcherServlet exposes the current LocaleResolver through the > global > LocaleContextHolder > * added RemoteInvocationTraceInterceptor, logging remote calls and > exceptions on the server > > * updated JasperReports support for JR 0.6.6, using JRDefaultCompiler > as > default report compiler > * reworked AbstractJasperReportsView to work on JasperPrint instance > rather > than JasperReport instance > * added support for reports with embedded SQL statements to > AbstractJasperReportsView > > For a detailed list of enhancements and bug fixes, see the changelog. > > This release candidate is considered stable and recommended for > development > use. We expect Spring 1.2 final to be released in about two weeks. |
|
From: Juergen H. <ju...@in...> - 2005-04-18 21:22:36
|
Dear Spring community, I'm pleased to announce that Spring 1.2 RC2 has just been released. This release introduces one major new feature: * support for JCA's Common Client Interface (CCI), including support for CCI local transactions Furthermore, there are various minor enhancements, for example: * deprecated ListableBeanFactory's "getBeanDefinitionNames(type)", in favor of "getBeanNamesForType" * added "value"/"value-ref" shortcut attributes to XML "entry" tag for maps * added "alias" root element for XML bean definition files, for aliases for beans in other files * JdbcAccessor lazily initializes the SQLExceptionTranslator by default now * added further configuration options to LocalSessionFactoryBean for Hibernate3 * added "defaultDestinationName" property to JmsTemplate, for a dynamic default destination * refined Resource support for compatibility with JDK 1.3's classic VM and with JRockit's jar paths * refactored static PathMatcher class into PathMatcher interface and AntPathMatcher implementation * added ConfigurableMimeFileTypeMap, with extensive MIME type mappings out-of-the-box * added "context.i18n" package, with LocaleContext abstraction and global LocaleContextHolder * DispatcherServlet exposes the current LocaleResolver through the global LocaleContextHolder * added RemoteInvocationTraceInterceptor, logging remote calls and exceptions on the server * updated JasperReports support for JR 0.6.6, using JRDefaultCompiler as default report compiler * reworked AbstractJasperReportsView to work on JasperPrint instance rather than JasperReport instance * added support for reports with embedded SQL statements to AbstractJasperReportsView For a detailed list of enhancements and bug fixes, see the changelog. This release candidate is considered stable and recommended for development use. We expect Spring 1.2 final to be released in about two weeks. Cheers, Juergen ----- Juergen Hoeller Interface21 - Spring Services from the Source http://www.springframework.com |
|
From: Alef A. <al...@jt...> - 2005-04-18 15:11:45
|
>>=20 You do have a point there regarding MVC vs servlet support separation. However, that would only work with a restructing of the package hierarchy there, because the current "web.servlet" package is essentially the direct basis for the controllers and views of the MVC framework. If we wanted to separate those into different modules, we'd get a problem, because we'd need to separate classes in the same subpackage tree there. =20 The current line drawn between spring-web.jar and spring-webmvc.jar is that the latter includes "web.servlet" plus subpackages and the former includes everything else. That works pretty well in general, because spring-web.jar is all you need to make a Spring application context work with Struts, JSF, Tapestry, any third-party MVC framework. =20 Of course, once you want to export HTTP-based remote services, you do need spring-webmvc.jar even when working with a third-party web MVC framework. I consider that acceptable, though: spring-webmvc.jar simply includes a generic dispatcher necessary for HTTP-based remoting, which will coexist nicely with any third-party MVC framework.=20 >> =20 Well, that's the point :). I personally don't consider including the webmvc.jar to be a real issue but some people out there (and Jason isn't the only one :) do! And it results in people creating custom code, which I don't like :). Let's leave it like it is for now. |
|
From: Alef A. <al...@jt...> - 2005-04-18 13:06:03
|
I'm trying to move the springmodules build notification to dev.java.net but I haven't succeeded so far :). Sorry for the inconvenience. Alef =20 -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf Of al...@in... Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 2:35 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: [Springframework-developer] springmodules build.3 Build Successful View results here -> http://opensource.jteam.nl/build/buildresults/springmodules?log=3Dlog2005= 0 418143423Lbuild.3 ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: <al...@in...> - 2005-04-18 12:25:16
|
View results here -> http://opensource.jteam.nl/build/buildresults/springmodules?log=log20050418143423Lbuild.3 |