Re: [Springframework-developer] Commons Validator

[Rob H. <ro...@ca...>]

I'm not that familiar with Commons Validator myself and I was wondering 
how that worked. I will be adding in validator-rules.xml and making the 
appropriate changes so that it works with the Spring Modules FieldChecks 
class.

Rob

Matt Raible wrote:

>
> On Apr 19, 2005, at 9:48 AM, Rob Harrop wrote:
>
>>
>> Matt,
>>  
>> Spring Modules 0.1 is going out to tomorrow we reworked Commons  
>> Validator support. I would certainly appreciate your feedback on it  
>> when you get a chance to us it.
>
>
> I updated from CVS and tried it - incorporating the changes listed in  
> changelog.txt.  Here's what I had to change to migrate from the  
> previous version (which mainly required package-name changes).
>
> BeanValidator -> DefaultBeanValidator
> Remove init-method attribute from ValidatorFactory
> Change "resources" property on ValidatorFactory to  
> "validationConfigLocations"
>
> Everything seems to work great.  Are there any additional changes you  
> plan on making before the 0.1 release?
>
> One thing I noticed in Validator 1.1.3 is that much of the JavaScript  
> is generated from code inside the JAR, rather than a  
> validator-rules.xml file.  I'm guessing validator-rules.xml is still  
> required for Spring integration? Yep, answered my own question: 
> leaving  it out results in:
>
> java.lang.NullPointerException: Depends string "required" was not 
> found  in validator-rules.xml.
>     at  
> org.springmodules.commons.validator.taglib.JavascriptValidatorTag.doStar 
> tTag(JavascriptValidatorTag.java:334)
>
> Maybe this file should be included in the release somehow - or we  
> should figure out a way to override the JavaScript that's generated  
> from inside commons-validator.jar?  The guys on the validator list 
> are  pretty friendly, so I'm guessing they'd be willing to help out 
> with  this.
>
> Matt
>
>>  
>> Rob
>>  
>>
>> From: spr...@li...  
>> [mailto:spr...@li...] On  
>> Behalf Of Matt Raible
>> Sent: 19 April 2005 17:04
>> To: spr...@li...
>> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Where does webflow live?
>>  
>>
>> So what's the recommended strategy here? Do you guys recommend I 
>> drop  spring-sandbox.jar from AppFuse/Equinox and use the 
>> springmodules  version of Commons Validator support? My guess is "yes".
>>
>>  It would be nice if there was a release of the validator support on  
>> java.net?. Is it possible to publish a 1.0 version of the validator  
>> JAR?
>>
>>  Thanks,
>>
>>  Matt
>>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
> Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
> creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime 
> info,
> new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>