Re: [Springframework-developer] Container Bean threshold?

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

Damn it, I told the guys that 96 beans wasn't enought, but they wouldn't 
listen to me...     

Just kidding. If somebody else doesn't get to it by then, I think I can 
look at this on Thurs...


Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:

>Obviously this is a big problem to us right now (doh), as Confluence has
>just passed 96 beans in Spring (yay!).
>
>Charles and I have just been investigating in more detail, it seems that as
>soon as we add the _97th_ bean, one of our _circular_ references barfs.
>
>We'll investigate further - but any ideas as to where to look would be most
>appreciated :)
>
>Cheers,
>Mike
>
>PS It may also be some sort of a limit in the number of circular referenced
>beans, or singletons? I'm not sure.
>
>On 4/2/04 1:43 PM, "Ross Mason" (ro...@at...) penned the words:
>
>  
>
>>Hi guys,
>>
>>I've just found some interesting behaviour in the spring container.  If
>>we have 96 beans in the container everything works fine, but if we add
>>one more bean, say bean97, the container complains that there may be a
>>circular reference even though I'm sure there isn't. But if we remove a
>>different (and totally unrelated) bean and add our bean97 bean it works
>>fine.  It seems the container has a bean threshold of 96?!
>>
>>Basically, we cannot add any than 96 beans to the container.
>>
>>Have you seen this behaviour before?
>>
>>--
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Ross
>>http://blog.rossmason.com
>>    
>>