|
From: Mike Cannon-B. <mi...@at...> - 2004-02-04 03:29:33
|
Obviously this is a big problem to us right now (doh), as Confluence has just passed 96 beans in Spring (yay!). Charles and I have just been investigating in more detail, it seems that as soon as we add the _97th_ bean, one of our _circular_ references barfs. We'll investigate further - but any ideas as to where to look would be most appreciated :) Cheers, Mike PS It may also be some sort of a limit in the number of circular referenced beans, or singletons? I'm not sure. On 4/2/04 1:43 PM, "Ross Mason" (ro...@at...) penned the words: > Hi guys, > > I've just found some interesting behaviour in the spring container. If > we have 96 beans in the container everything works fine, but if we add > one more bean, say bean97, the container complains that there may be a > circular reference even though I'm sure there isn't. But if we remove a > different (and totally unrelated) bean and add our bean97 bean it works > fine. It seems the container has a bean threshold of 96?! > > Basically, we cannot add any than 96 beans to the container. > > Have you seen this behaviour before? > > -- > Cheers, > > Ross > http://blog.rossmason.com > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |