|
From: Ross M. <ro...@at...> - 2004-01-06 22:35:09
|
Hi all,
A better solution would be to make the logger transient as it doesn't
really make sense to serialise (sorry, serialize ;-)) it. Plus i don't
think org.apache.commons.logging.Log or implementations are Serializable.
Cheers,
Ross
MacMahon, Mark wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have got a package of Spring configured objects that I would like to use
> interchangeably in both a web application and
> an EJB application (from SFSB).
> Some of my Objects are BeanFactoryAware so that they can create on demand,
> prototype instances of spring configured objects.
>
> All works well in web application mode. However I cannot get it to work
> reliably in ejb mode due to the fact that BeanFactory is not serializable -
> exceptions on passivation of the SFSB.
>
> Why isn't BeanFactory serializable? I can see that the Log class is being
> stored as a member rather than a class variable in some of the spring
> classes but surely this can be changed easily?
>
>
> Shouldn't the BeanFactoryWare interface be documented so as to discourage
> use of it in beans that are used in an EJB environment?
>
> Is there any way that I can avoid reverting back to using a typical java
> singleton for access to the BeanFactory for the scenario that I have
> described (loading prototypes on demand)
>
>
> I am also getting problems passivating the SFSB due to the fact that
> AbstractEnterpriseBean stores its logger as a member rather than a class
> variable:
> Is this convenience really worth sacrificing serializable support?
>
> abstract class AbstractEnterpriseBean implements EnterpriseBean
> {
>
> /** Logger, available to subclasses */
> protected final Log logger = LogFactory.getLog(getClass());
>
> //Change to static to support serializable
> //private final static Log logger =
> LogFactory.getLog(AbstractEnterpriseBean.class);
>
> }
>
>
>
> Please forgive me if I am addressing the wrong mailing list here!
>
> Any help appreciated!
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Mark
>
> ____________________________________________________
>
> emuse technologies
> U24 Trinity Enterprise Centre, Pearse Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.
> Tel: +353 (0)1 6717317 Fax: +353 (0)1 6717319
> website: <http://www.emusetechnologies.com/>
> email: in...@em... <mailto:in...@em...>
> ____________________________________________________
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses using GroupShield for Exchange
> Server.
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - The information contained in this email message is
> intended only for confidential use of the named recipient. If the reader is
> not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering it to
> the recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
> communication in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error,
> please notify the sender immediately.
>
> The information, opinions and recommendations contained herein are and must
> be construed solely as statements of opinion and not statements of fact. No
> warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness,
> completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any
> such recommendation or information is given or made by emuse technologies in
> any form or manner whatsoever.
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
> Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
> Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
> Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
|