Re: [Springframework-developer] Scheduler update #3

[Ivan R. <iv...@we...>]

Mark Imbriaco wrote:

> Ivan Ristic <> scribbled on Monday, December 22, 2003 9:03 AM:
> 
>>I don't want to label it full 1.0 before I (or someone else) actually
>>use it in a project. Ignore the licence, I always use GPL by default. 
> 
> I don't believe the ASL, which Spring is licensed under, can include GPLed
> code without violating the GPL.  The LGPL would probably be ok, since it
> explicitly allows linking.  
> 
> I could be wrong, but that's my understanding of the situation.  Someone
> please correct me if I'm missing something.

   I don't think that ASL is compatible with GPL (or LGPL) either. But
   I had to put some kind of licence on the code and I normally use
   GPL.

   If the scheduler makes it into Spring the licence will be ASL.

-- 
ModSecurity (http://www.modsecurity.org)
[ Open source IDS for Web applications ]