Menu
▾
▴
[Springframework-developer] RE: About CGLIB2
|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2003-12-11 15:15:30
|
Everybody, Hibernate 2.1 final with CGLIB2 underneath has just been released. This = poses the question whether we should still release our 1.0 M4 with = CGLIB1 support. Of course, our current codebase works nicely with = Hibernate 2.1 as long as you don't use CGLIB-based AOP proxies (i.e. = proxy full target objects instead of just interfaces), so we don't = *have* to update immediately. Migrating our AOP proxy generation to CGLIB2 should be straightforward. = Afterwards, it will be the other way round in terms of compatibility: = Hibernate 2.0 will still work with a current Spring release as long as = you don't use CGLIB-based AOP proxies. In any case, the most important = rule is to just have the CGLIB version needed by your Hibernate version = in the class path. CGLIB2 is at RC1 in the meantime, so building on it now would be viable. = In the face of this situation, does everybody still prefer deferred = CGLIB2 support at the time of our RC1? I vote for migrating already in = M4, to allow for CGLIB-based AOP proxies in combination with Hibernate = 2.1 promptly. After all, typical Spring users will choose to work with = the most current recommended Hibernate version. Not that this was a really important criterion, but nevertheless: Chris, = when do you expect CGLIB2 final? Juergen -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of Alef Arendsen (JTeam) Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:20 PM To: spr...@li... Subject: About CGLIB2 (was: RE: [Springframework-developer] Release plan) Juergen (et al), So the current plan is: - M4 (CGLIB1): just before X-mas - RC1 (CGLIB2): 2nd week of January or something. Is there any idea on when CGLIB2 support is to be introduced (I heard supporting both of them at a time is a hassle or at least too much work). We've currently got a project (Spring + Hibernate 2.1) underway of which a initial release is targetted for the 12th of January. Are there going to be significant changes when moving from CGLIB1 to 2 (which will force me to stick with M4 for that particular project) or is it going to be a smooth transition without much impact? Thanks! Alef > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: spr...@li...=20 > [mailto:spr...@li...] > Namens j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] > Verzonden: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 3:27 PM > Aan: spr...@li... > Onderwerp: [Springframework-developer] Release plan >=20 >=20 > Guys, >=20 > We need to settle on a concrete roadmap. >=20 > Despite our initial plans to go straight to RC1, I'm inclined=20 > to vote for an M4 in two weeks' time, with the significant=20 > reworkings that have been introduced in the meantime (in the=20 > bean factory and AOP area), with the current state of the=20 > docs, and still with CGLIB1. We can also introduce our=20 > JPetStore version with that release. >=20 > I suggest to target RC1 for early January then, with CGLIB2=20 > and - most importantly - a proper reference manual. In the=20 > ideal case, 1.0 final could be ready at the end of January.=20 > M4 would correspond to a feature freeze, with full=20 > concentration on bugfixes and docs afterwards. RC1 should=20 > already be as good as it gets, a true "release candidate". >=20 > Juergen >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: spr...@li... > [mailto:spr...@li...] > On Behalf Of Matthew E. Porter > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:37 PM > To: spr...@li... > Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Hibernate 2.1 and CGLIB >=20 >=20 > This was a good answer since it provides a roadmap. Can someone post=20 > this on the wiki or the website for others who may have the same=20 > question? >=20 >=20 > Cheers, > matthew >=20 > On Dec 1, 2003, at 11:04 AM, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote: >=20 > > Hi Matthew, > > > > We've been discussing that for a while. If Hibernate 2.1 gets final > > early enough (and it seems to, being already in RC1 stage), we will=20 > > switch to it for our 1.0 RCs. If 2.1 would still be far=20 > from final, we=20 > > would probably have to support both CGLIB1 and CGLIB2 somehow.=20 > > Fortunately, that seems not to be necessary anymore! > > > > For the time being, if you don't proxy full classes (but just > > interfaces) or don't use Spring AOP in the first place, you=20 > should be=20 > > able to work with Hibernate 2.1 and its CGLIB2 without hassle. The=20 > > same will apply to Hibernate 2.0 users after we've moved to CGLIB2:=20 > > You don't need to worry if you don't use Spring AOP will=20 > full proxies. > > > > I think we can live with requiring an update to Hibernate 2.1 if a > > user wants full AOP proxies in combination. Actually, we probably=20 > > *need* to move to CGLIB2 once Hibernate 2.1 final is=20 > released: Power=20 > > users will want to combine full Spring AOP proxying with=20 > the current=20 > > Hibernate version, not with a previous one. > > > > Now it would be really great if CGLIB2 were final too until=20 > Spring 1.0 > > final! :-) It's no problem to ship a CGLIB2 beta with our upcoming=20 > > Spring 1.0 RC1, but it worries me to include a CGLIB2 beta=20 > in Spring=20 > > 1.0 final. Haven't the Hibernate guys the same problem? Or are they=20 > > fine with shipping a CGLIB2 beta with Hibernate 2.1 final? > > > > So I suggest to release our 1.0 RC1 shortly after Hibernate=20 > 2.1 final, > > already with CGLIB2 support. As I said, we will just force=20 > users with=20 > > full AOP proxies to upgrade to Hibernate 2.1 if using the two in=20 > > combination. We could release a 1.0 M4 shortly before that though,=20 > > still with CGLIB1 - to ease migration paths for Hibernate 2.0 users. > > > > Juergen > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: spr...@li... > > [mailto:spr...@li...]On=20 > > Behalf Of Matthew E. Porter > > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 5:06 PM > > To: spr...@li... > > Subject: [Springframework-developer] Hibernate 2.1 and CGLIB > > > > > > I have looked through the mailing list archives but was=20 > unable to find=20 > > the answer to my question. Will Spring move to support=20 > Hibernate 2.1=20 > > (as it is the new *recommended* version) and, if so, when? > > > > Also, does anyone know if I can use it now with the cglib version=20 > > change? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > matthew > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does=20 > > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help=20 > you create=20 > > better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here:=20 > > http://sourceforge.net/donate/=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > Springframework-developer mailing list=20 > > Spr...@li... > >=20 > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/s> pringframework-developer > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does=20 > > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help=20 > you create=20 > > better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here:=20 > > http://sourceforge.net/donate/=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > Springframework-developer mailing list=20 > > Spr...@li... > >=20 > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/s> pringframework-developer >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.=20 > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it=20 > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us=20 > help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/=20 > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list=20 > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.=20 > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it=20 > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us=20 > help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/=20 > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list=20 > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >=20 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN's Audience Survey. Help shape OSDN's sites and tell us what you think. Take this five minute survey and you could win a $250 Gift Certificate. http://www.wrgsurveys.com/2003/osdntech03.php?site=3D _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
