Menu
▾
▴
RE: [Springframework-developer] Release plan
|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-12-02 16:06:09
|
+1 for M4 > Does anybody see a problem=20 > with some of the JavaDoc text=20 > beeing repeated in the reference doc? Not really, as long as we're not going to end up with a reference doc that is describing each and every class in detail, without giving insight in the general picture and provide examples, but I think that's not the problem... Alef > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: spr...@li...=20 > [mailto:spr...@li...] > Namens tri...@tr... > Verzonden: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 4:10 PM > Aan: spr...@li... > Onderwerp: RE: [Springframework-developer] Release plan >=20 >=20 > +1 for M4 - this will get the latest StoredProcedure with Mapped=20 > +ResultSet > implementation into a release quicker. The original version=20 > using a RowCallbackHandler was not that useful since there=20 > was nowhere to put the results in a thread safe manner. >=20 > For the documentation, I'm approaching this the following way: >=20 > 1. Create anoutline based on the central concepts and most=20 > frequently used features. 2. Fill in the outline with the=20 > JavaDoc text from the corresponding classes. 3. Enhance the=20 > text a bit. 4. Add codesamples where necessary. >=20 > At this point we should have a decent document >=20 > 5. Repeat 3 and 4 until perfect :-) >=20 > Does anybody see a problem with some of the JavaDoc text=20 > beeing repeated in the reference doc? >=20 > Thomas >=20 > Quoting "Kopylenko, Dmitry" <dko...@ac...>: >=20 > > +1 for M4. I would agree that the docs should be in "good shape" by=20 > > +the time > > of RC and final. > >=20 > > Dmitriy. > >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] = [mailto:jue...@we...] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 9:27 AM > > To: spr...@li... > > Subject: [Springframework-developer] Release plan > >=20 > >=20 > > Guys, > >=20 > > We need to settle on a concrete roadmap. > >=20 > > Despite our initial plans to go straight to RC1, I'm=20 > inclined to vote=20 > > for an M4 in two weeks' time, with the significant reworkings that=20 > > have been introduced in the meantime (in the bean factory and AOP=20 > > area), with the current state of the docs, and still with=20 > CGLIB1. We=20 > > can also introduce our JPetStore version with that release. > >=20 > > I suggest to target RC1 for early January then, with CGLIB2=20 > and - most=20 > > importantly - a proper reference manual. In the ideal case,=20 > 1.0 final=20 > > could be ready at the end of January. M4 would correspond=20 > to a feature=20 > > freeze, with full concentration on bugfixes and docs=20 > afterwards. RC1=20 > > should already be as good as it gets, a true "release candidate". > >=20 > > Juergen > >=20 > >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: spr...@li... > > [mailto:spr...@li...]On=20 > > Behalf Of Matthew E. Porter > > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:37 PM > > To: spr...@li... > > Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Hibernate 2.1 and CGLIB > >=20 > >=20 > > This was a good answer since it provides a roadmap. Can=20 > someone post > > this on the wiki or the website for others who may have the same=20 > > question? > >=20 > >=20 > > Cheers, > > matthew > >=20 > > On Dec 1, 2003, at 11:04 AM, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote: > >=20 > > > Hi Matthew, > > > > > > We've been discussing that for a while. If Hibernate 2.1=20 > gets final=20 > > > early enough (and it seems to, being already in RC1=20 > stage), we will=20 > > > switch to it for our 1.0 RCs. If 2.1 would still be far=20 > from final,=20 > > > we would probably have to support both CGLIB1 and CGLIB2 somehow.=20 > > > Fortunately, that seems not to be necessary anymore! > > > > > > For the time being, if you don't proxy full classes (but just > > > interfaces) or don't use Spring AOP in the first place,=20 > you should=20 > > > be > > > able to work with Hibernate 2.1 and its CGLIB2 without=20 > hassle. The=20 > > > same will apply to Hibernate 2.0 users after we've moved=20 > to CGLIB2:=20 > > > You don't need to worry if you don't use Spring AOP will=20 > full proxies. > > > > > > I think we can live with requiring an update to Hibernate=20 > 2.1 if a=20 > > > user wants full AOP proxies in combination. Actually, we probably > > > *need* to move to CGLIB2 once Hibernate 2.1 final is=20 > released: Power > > > users will want to combine full Spring AOP proxying with=20 > the current=20 > > > Hibernate version, not with a previous one. > > > > > > Now it would be really great if CGLIB2 were final too=20 > until Spring=20 > > > 1.0 final! :-) It's no problem to ship a CGLIB2 beta with our=20 > > > upcoming Spring 1.0 RC1, but it worries me to include a=20 > CGLIB2 beta=20 > > > in Spring 1.0 final. Haven't the Hibernate guys the same=20 > problem? Or=20 > > > are they fine with shipping a CGLIB2 beta with Hibernate=20 > 2.1 final? > > > > > > So I suggest to release our 1.0 RC1 shortly after Hibernate 2.1=20 > > > final, already with CGLIB2 support. As I said, we will just force=20 > > > users with full AOP proxies to upgrade to Hibernate 2.1=20 > if using the=20 > > > two in combination. We could release a 1.0 M4 shortly before that=20 > > > though, still with CGLIB1 - to ease migration paths for Hibernate=20 > > > 2.0 users. > > > > > > Juergen > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: spr...@li... > > > [mailto:spr...@li...]On > > > Behalf Of Matthew E. Porter > > > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 5:06 PM > > > To: spr...@li... > > > Subject: [Springframework-developer] Hibernate 2.1 and CGLIB > > > > > > > > > I have looked through the mailing list archives but was unable to=20 > > > find > > > the answer to my question. Will Spring move to support=20 > Hibernate 2.1=20 > > > (as it is the new *recommended* version) and, if so, when? > > > > > > Also, does anyone know if I can use it now with the cglib version > > > change? > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > matthew > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does > > > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it=20 > help you create=20 > > > better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here:=20 > > > http://sourceforge.net/donate/=20 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Springframework-developer mailing list=20 > > > Spr...@li... > > >=20 > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does > > > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it=20 > help you create=20 > > > better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here:=20 > > > http://sourceforge.net/donate/=20 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Springframework-developer mailing list=20 > > > Spr...@li... > > >=20 > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does=20 > > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help=20 > you create=20 > > better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here:=20 > > http://sourceforge.net/donate/=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > Springframework-developer mailing list=20 > > Spr...@li... > >=20 > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/s> pringframework-developer > >=20 > >=20 > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does=20 > > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help=20 > you create=20 > > better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here:=20 > > http://sourceforge.net/donate/=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > Springframework-developer mailing list=20 > > Spr...@li... > >=20 > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/s> pringframework-developer > >=20 > >=20 > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does=20 > > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help=20 > you create=20 > > better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here:=20 > > http://sourceforge.net/donate/=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > Springframework-developer mailing list=20 > > Spr...@li... > >=20 > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/s> pringframework-developer > >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.=20 > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it=20 > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us=20 > help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/=20 > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list=20 > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer >=20 |
