Menu
▾
▴
RE: [Springframework-developer] Release plan
|
From: <tri...@tr...> - 2003-12-02 15:09:48
|
+1 for M4 - this will get the latest StoredProcedure with Mapped ResultSet implementation into a release quicker. The original version using a RowCallbackHandler was not that useful since there was nowhere to put the results in a thread safe manner. For the documentation, I'm approaching this the following way: 1. Create anoutline based on the central concepts and most frequently used features. 2. Fill in the outline with the JavaDoc text from the corresponding classes. 3. Enhance the text a bit. 4. Add codesamples where necessary. At this point we should have a decent document 5. Repeat 3 and 4 until perfect :-) Does anybody see a problem with some of the JavaDoc text beeing repeated in the reference doc? Thomas Quoting "Kopylenko, Dmitry" <dko...@ac...>: > +1 for M4. I would agree that the docs should be in "good shape" by the time > of RC and final. > > Dmitriy. > > -----Original Message----- > From: jürgen höller [werk3AT] [mailto:jue...@we...] > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 9:27 AM > To: spr...@li... > Subject: [Springframework-developer] Release plan > > > Guys, > > We need to settle on a concrete roadmap. > > Despite our initial plans to go straight to RC1, I'm inclined to vote for an > M4 in two weeks' time, with the significant reworkings that have been > introduced in the meantime (in the bean factory and AOP area), with the > current state of the docs, and still with CGLIB1. We can also introduce our > JPetStore version with that release. > > I suggest to target RC1 for early January then, with CGLIB2 and - most > importantly - a proper reference manual. In the ideal case, 1.0 final could > be ready at the end of January. M4 would correspond to a feature freeze, > with full concentration on bugfixes and docs afterwards. RC1 should already > be as good as it gets, a true "release candidate". > > Juergen > > > -----Original Message----- > From: spr...@li... > [mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf Of > Matthew E. Porter > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:37 PM > To: spr...@li... > Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Hibernate 2.1 and CGLIB > > > This was a good answer since it provides a roadmap. Can someone post > this on the wiki or the website for others who may have the same > question? > > > Cheers, > matthew > > On Dec 1, 2003, at 11:04 AM, jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: > > > Hi Matthew, > > > > We've been discussing that for a while. If Hibernate 2.1 gets final > > early enough (and it seems to, being already in RC1 stage), we will > > switch to it for our 1.0 RCs. If 2.1 would still be far from final, we > > would probably have to support both CGLIB1 and CGLIB2 somehow. > > Fortunately, that seems not to be necessary anymore! > > > > For the time being, if you don't proxy full classes (but just > > interfaces) or don't use Spring AOP in the first place, you should be > > able to work with Hibernate 2.1 and its CGLIB2 without hassle. The > > same will apply to Hibernate 2.0 users after we've moved to CGLIB2: > > You don't need to worry if you don't use Spring AOP will full proxies. > > > > I think we can live with requiring an update to Hibernate 2.1 if a > > user wants full AOP proxies in combination. Actually, we probably > > *need* to move to CGLIB2 once Hibernate 2.1 final is released: Power > > users will want to combine full Spring AOP proxying with the current > > Hibernate version, not with a previous one. > > > > Now it would be really great if CGLIB2 were final too until Spring 1.0 > > final! :-) It's no problem to ship a CGLIB2 beta with our upcoming > > Spring 1.0 RC1, but it worries me to include a CGLIB2 beta in Spring > > 1.0 final. Haven't the Hibernate guys the same problem? Or are they > > fine with shipping a CGLIB2 beta with Hibernate 2.1 final? > > > > So I suggest to release our 1.0 RC1 shortly after Hibernate 2.1 final, > > already with CGLIB2 support. As I said, we will just force users with > > full AOP proxies to upgrade to Hibernate 2.1 if using the two in > > combination. We could release a 1.0 M4 shortly before that though, > > still with CGLIB1 - to ease migration paths for Hibernate 2.0 users. > > > > Juergen > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: spr...@li... > > [mailto:spr...@li...]On > > Behalf Of Matthew E. Porter > > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 5:06 PM > > To: spr...@li... > > Subject: [Springframework-developer] Hibernate 2.1 and CGLIB > > > > > > I have looked through the mailing list archives but was unable to find > > the answer to my question. Will Spring move to support Hibernate 2.1 > > (as it is the new *recommended* version) and, if so, when? > > > > Also, does anyone know if I can use it now with the cglib version > > change? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > matthew > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does > > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create > > better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: > > http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Springframework-developer mailing list > > Spr...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does > > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create > > better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: > > http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Springframework-developer mailing list > > Spr...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better > code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: > http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better > code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: > http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > |
