[Springframework-developer] FW: Spring logical modules

[Kopylenko, D. <dko...@ac...>]

To the list...

-----Original Message-----
From: j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]
To: Kopylenko, Dmitry; al...@jt...; Kopylenko, Dmitry; Rod Johnson; =
Colin
Sampaleanu; Trevor Cook; Thomas Risberg; dar...@hs...; =
Luke
Taylor; mpo...@sp...; Tony Falabella
Sent: 11/19/2003 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: Spring logical modules

I like the idea of modules for documentation and marketing purposes =
too,
although we still need to discuss the naming, as we will have to stick
with what we choose for quite a while. We shouldn't try to get too
fine-granular, I guess.
=20
Regarding validation: The validation.ObjectError class has a dependency
on context.MessageSourceResolvable, therefore doesn't belong to core =
but
rather to context/container.
=20
Regarding web MVC: I'd rather call this SpringWeb or something similar,
as it isn't purely about web MVC but also offers a lot for use with
other web frameworks.
=20
Juergen
=20

________________________________

Von: Kopylenko, Dmitry [mailto:dko...@ac...]
Gesendet: Mi 19.11.2003 19:11
An: 'al...@jt...'; Kopylenko, Dmitry; 'Rod Johnson'; j=FCrgen =
h=F6ller
[werk3AT]; 'Colin Sampaleanu'; 'Trevor Cook'; 'Thomas Risberg';
'dar...@hs...'; 'Luke Taylor'; 'mpo...@sp...';
'Tony Falabella'
Betreff: RE: Spring logical modules


So the logical modules names is a good idea. Ok. So validation could be
part of SpringCore and remoting, jndi, mail, ejb part of SpringJ2EE
=20
JIRA - I've got the open source license. Also Mike sent me an email =
last
week saying that they will install Spring instance on their server some
time this week (they've upgraded to the latest version of 2.5) So if I
don't hear from him by the end of this week, I'll contact him. We're
almost there :-)
=20
Dmitriy.

	-----Original Message-----
	From: Alef Arendsen (JTeam) [mailto:al...@jt...]=20
	Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:40 PM
	To: 'Kopylenko, Dmitry'; 'Rod Johnson'; 'j=FCrgen h=F6ller
[werk3AT]'; 'Colin Sampaleanu'; 'Trevor Cook'; 'Thomas Risberg';
dar...@hs...; 'Luke Taylor'; mpo...@sp...; 'Tony
Falabella'
	Subject: RE: Spring logical modules
=09
=09
	Sounds good.=20
	=20
	When creating the initial structure for the reference
documentation (on which I hope to spend some time coming weekend), I =
had
almost the same structure except for the following:
	=20
	SpringContainer split into beans and context (but it seems
logical to see it as one)
	SpringDAO split into JDBC and ORM (idem)
	=20
	Furtermore I had a separate chapter for validation (part of
SpringCore??), email and remoting (but those being part of J2EE is fine
with me).
	=20
	How's the JIRA thing going by the way?
	=20
	alef
	=20

		-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
		Van: Kopylenko, Dmitry
[mailto:dko...@ac...]=20
		Verzonden: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:04 PM
		Aan: 'Rod Johnson (rod...@in...)';
'j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]'; 'Colin Sampaleanu'; 'Trevor Cook'; =
'Thomas
Risberg'; 'al...@jt...'; 'dar...@hs...'; 'Luke Taylor';
'mpo...@sp...'; 'Tony Falabella'
		Onderwerp: Spring logical modules
	=09
	=09

		Helo everyone,=20

		Here is the proposal to use "logical" modules (just
names) of the Spring framework grouped by functional area=20
		analogous to JBoss's logical modules e.g. JBossMX,
JBossNS, JBossTX etc. Then these module names could be used in
documentation,

		marketing and as JIRA components.=20

		Modules:=20

		* SpringAOP (aop framework)=20
		* SpringContainer (beans, context packages)=20
		* SpringCore (core, util packages)=20
		* SpringDAO (dao, jdbc, orm packages)=20
		* SpringMVC (web packages)=20
		* SpringTX (transaction infrastructure)=20
		* SpringMetadata (metadata packages)=20
		* SpringJ2EE (jndi, mail packages)=20

		Anything else? Any comments/ideas?=20

		Regards,=20
		Dmitriy.=20