RE: [Springframework-developer] AOP API

[renaud <re...@ao...>]

> Well, following AspectJ terminology the Advice is the 
> construct that implements the crosscutting behavior 
> (Interceptor in our case) and Aspect is the collection of 
> Advice and Pointcuts. But Pointcut _is not_ Advice. So, how about:
> 
>  public interfce Advice{}
>  
>  public interface Interceptor extends Advice{}
> 
>  public interface Aspect {
>     Advice[] getAdvice();
>     Pointcut[] getPointcut();
> }

That's close to my first draft, but how do you link advice and pointcuts
then??

As I said in my previous email, Rod's proposal gets my vote for the moment.

Regards,
Renaud.

> 
> Regards,
> Dmitriy.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: renaud [mailto:re...@ao...] 
> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 2:02 PM
> To: spr...@li...
> Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] AOP API
> 
> 
> > 
> > > > public interface Advice {
> > > >     getInterceptor();
> > > >     getPointcut();
> > > > }
> > >
> > > I agree with the construct here and I like it. However, the 
> > > terminology is quite confusing. It does not stick with usual AOP 
> > > terminology (e.g. AspectJ).
> > >
> > > What about (random thought):
> > >
> > > public interface AdvisedPointcut {
> > >     getInterceptor();
> > >     getPointcut();
> > > }
> > 
> > I'm open to suggestions as to naming.  AdvisedPointcut makes sense, 
> > but didn't initially appeal to me.
> > 
> > AspectElement? To make it clear that it could be a unit of 
> composition 
> > in more complex aspects (as in the additional Aspect interface I 
> > proposed).
> 
> Ummm...
> Having a second thought, I was wrong. Advice makes sense 
> within the AOP terminology. If you look at AspectJ, your 
> advice contains a pointcut *and* a code (the interceptor 
> part) -- the idea is that you can have abstract pointcuts 
> that you can then refine in subclasses of the aspects.
> 
> So, finally, I like very much:
> 
> public interface Advice {
>     getInterceptor();
>     getPointcut();
> }
> 
> And of course the subsequent:
> 
> public interface Aspect {
>     Advice[] getAdvice();
> }
> 
> +1 for me.
> 
> Renaud.
> 
> 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Rod
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
> > 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest 
> developments 
> > in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! 
> > http://www.apachecon.com/ 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Springframework-developer mailing list
> > Spr...@li...
> > 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/s> pringframework-developer
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
> 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest 
> developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, 
> and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ 
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list 
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
> 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest 
> developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, 
> and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ 
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list 
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>