Re: [Springframework-developer] AOP API

[Rod J. <rod...@in...>]

> > public interface Advice {
> >     getInterceptor();
> >     getPointcut();
> > }
>
> I agree with the construct here and I like it. However, the terminology is
> quite confusing. It does not stick with usual AOP terminology (e.g.
> AspectJ).
>
> What about (random thought):
>
> public interface AdvisedPointcut {
>     getInterceptor();
>     getPointcut();
> }

I'm open to suggestions as to naming.  AdvisedPointcut makes sense, but
didn't initially appeal to me.

AspectElement? To make it clear that it could be a unit of composition in
more complex aspects (as in the additional Aspect interface I proposed).

Regards,
Rod