|
From: Trevor C. <pr...@se...> - 2003-11-03 14:04:44
|
Thanks Ivan. I've taken a quick look at the manual, and it looks pretty
good. I think Rod covered all the things necessary for Spring, so assuming
those are met, I'd vote to have the simple scheduler (yours) inside Spring
("out-of-the-box"), with a Quartz wrapper available.
I'll dig a little deeper today and compare it to what might be needed for
Quartz (since that's what I use, and what everyone seems to be asking for).
However, a really light-weight option like yours is definately good for
Spring.
Trevor
-----Original Message-----
From: spr...@li...
[mailto:spr...@li...]On Behalf
Of Ivan Ristic
Sent: November 3, 2003 6:59 AM
To: spr...@li...
Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Scheduler update #2
> I don't think Spring should attempt to include a full-featured scheduler.
I agree with that, except that I wouldn't consider this scheduler to
be full-featured :) Chronos is an attempt at a small library to
satisfy the needs of most people so that they don't have to go out
and learn more complex libraries.
If you don't think that it should be a part of Spring I have no
problem with that.
> However, there is an argument for including a convenient, readily
available,
> implementation of a scheduler abstraction. This gives the user the
benefits
> of pluggability in good Spring fashion.
We'll see whether someone will come forward. Or, we may attempt to
contact the Quartz people and seek their help/opinion.
--
ModSecurity (http://www.modsecurity.org)
[ Open source IDS for Web applications ]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
|