Re: [Springframework-developer] Scheduler update #2

[Rod J. <rod...@in...>]

Ivan,

I meant that Chronos was small, not a "full-featured scheduler", and that is
good. Therefore it could potentially be part of Spring.

Regards,
Rod

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ivan Ristic" <iv...@we...>
To: <spr...@li...>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Scheduler update #2


>
> > I don't think Spring should attempt to include a full-featured
scheduler.
>
>    I agree with that, except that I wouldn't consider this scheduler to
>    be full-featured :) Chronos is an attempt at a small library to
>    satisfy the needs of most people so that they don't have to go out
>    and learn more complex libraries.
>
>    If you don't think that it should be a part of Spring I have no
>    problem with that.
>
>
> > However, there is an argument for including a convenient, readily
available,
> > implementation of a scheduler abstraction. This gives the user the
benefits
> > of pluggability in good Spring fashion.
>
>    We'll see whether someone will come forward. Or, we may attempt to
>    contact the Quartz people and seek their help/opinion.
>
> -- 
> ModSecurity (http://www.modsecurity.org)
> [ Open source IDS for Web applications ]
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>