Re: [Springframework-developer] Scheduler update #2

[Ivan R. <iv...@we...>]

> I don't think Spring should attempt to include a full-featured scheduler.

   I agree with that, except that I wouldn't consider this scheduler to
   be full-featured :) Chronos is an attempt at a small library to
   satisfy the needs of most people so that they don't have to go out
   and learn more complex libraries.

   If you don't think that it should be a part of Spring I have no
   problem with that.


> However, there is an argument for including a convenient, readily available,
> implementation of a scheduler abstraction. This gives the user the benefits
> of pluggability in good Spring fashion.

   We'll see whether someone will come forward. Or, we may attempt to
   contact the Quartz people and seek their help/opinion.

-- 
ModSecurity (http://www.modsecurity.org)
[ Open source IDS for Web applications ]