RE: [Springframework-developer] Re: Spring Framework 1.0 M2 released

[<tri...@tr...>]

Sime more statistics:

Hits on the www.springframework.org domain are up drastically since the last TSS
threads. 

See:  http://www.springframework.org/usage/Spring_hits.htm

Thomas


> FYI, a little statistics: We had 970 downloads of 1.0 M2 as of tomorrow
> morning, after just 6 days! 1.0 M1 has 2800 after 2 months. 0.9 just had 400
> till 0.9.1 came out. Great numbers, IMO!
> 
> For a comparison, WebWork 1.3 has 2300 in the 6 months since end of April. Of
> course, Hibernate 2.0.3 has 11600 after 2 months now... but 2.0 and 2.0.1
> together had "just" 2700 in the 2 months till 2.0.2 came out.
> 
> Juergen
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tri...@tr... [mailto:tri...@tr...]
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 2:58 AM
> To: spr...@li...; jürgen höller
> [werk3AT]
> Cc: spr...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Re: Spring Framework 1.0 M2
> released
> 
> 
> Juergen,
> 
> I have updated the website - let me know if I missed something.
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> > Thomas,
> >  
> > Can you please update the website accordingly, including the documentation
> > articles?
> >  
> > Thanks,
> > Juergen
> >  
> >  
> > 
> > 	-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- 
> > 	Von: jürgen höller [werk3AT] 
> > 	Gesendet: Fr 24.10.2003 01:08 
> > 	An: spr...@li... 
> > 	Cc: spr...@li... 
> > 	Betreff: Spring Framework 1.0 M2 released
> > 	
> > 	
> > 	Hi Spring followers,
> > 	 
> > 	I'm pleased to announce that we've just released 1.0 M2, the second
> > milestone release towards 1.0 and fourth public release in total. It
> contains
> > numerous bug fixes and new features; see the change log for details.
> > 	 
> > 	A major change in terms of samples is that Petclinic is now available in
> > alternative implementations for JDBC and Hibernate; therefore, the minimum
> > Hibernate jars are now included in the distribution. Furthermore, the
> > skeletons have been repackaged into "webapp-minimal" and "webapp-typical",
> > the latter with multiple application context configurations.
> > 	 
> > 	An important change in recommendation is for the <ref .../> tag in XML
> bean
> > definitions: <ref bean="..."/> is now a general reference to any bean name
> in
> > the context, while <ref local="..."/> references a bean id in the same XML
> > file (allowing for validation by the XML parser). <ref external="..."/> is
> > deprecated now; it behaves the same as <ref bean="..."/> for the time
> being.
> > 
> > 	 
> > 	So consider <ref bean="..."/> as the general reference now, no matter if
> > local or in a parent context, and <ref local="..."/> as the optional one
> for
> > strong validation in the local XML file. All existing bean definitions
> will
> > still work, although we recommend to replace <ref external="..."/> tags
> with
> > <ref bean="..."/>.
> > 	 
> > 	Finally, I'd like to note one minor incompatible API change:
> > AbstractFormController's former "processSubmit" method is now called
> > "processFormSubmission" to avoid confusion with the "onSubmit" callback of
> > SimpleFormController. This will only affect you if you have subclassed
> > AbstractFormController directly; simply rename your implementation method
> > then.
> > 	 
> > 	Regards,
> > 	Juergen
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>