Re: [Springframework-developer] new bean factory and application context features

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

Kopylenko, Dmitry wrote:

>>AutoProxyCreator is not yet in CVS, but I can add it promptly. BTW, I'm
>>    
>>
>not really sure about the name -- do you have a better name for 
>  
>
>>such a bean that automatically wraps other beans with proxies?
>>    
>>
>
>Juergen,
>
>AutoProxyCreator is fine with me. What didn't you like about it? :-) Or how
>about AutoProxyManager then?
>
>  
>
The name sounds ok to me. It could also be AutoProxyCreatorBean I guess, 
although I prefer it without that ending since I don't see the need to 
advertise the fact that it's a bean. In fact, there are a few classes in 
Spring where I am not quite clear on why 'bEan' was tacked onto the 
name. Other cases are obvious, such as where the name exists with and 
without 'Bean', e.g. ProxyFactory and ProxyFactoryBean, HttpServlet and 
HttpServletBean, or 'Bean' was added to make it a noun...

Regards,
Colin