|
From: Mark M. <mar...@co...> - 2003-09-28 17:33:51
|
"Comprehensive, cohesive, loosely-coupled java application framework" perhaps? Or maybe just "Comprehensive java application framework" or even "Java application framework"? Mark -----Original Message----- From: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf Of Rod Johnson Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 11:47 AM To: Trevor Cook; spr...@li... Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Slogan >I think a selling feature of Spring is > that you can learn the way Spring works and apply it to all the pieces, > rather than learning multiple disparate apis. Yes, Spring is a philosophy or approach, that's applied in different areas. > "SPRING-board to J2EE success" :-( > "a simple, standard way to develop custom applications" Better. Although "standard" has a particular meaning (which doesn't apply to the J2EE "standards" much more than Spring) > "a solid foundation to build your custom applications on" Also better > "learn once, use anywhere" I like this. Good concept, well expressed. Probably should be part of our brief paragraph. I've been thinking about the phrase "application framework". Like "application server". Spring is a framework for _whole_ application frameworks. Whereas Struts is a _web_ application framework, Spring is a _whole_ application framework. If we could think of some better alternative to "whole" to go before "application framework"... Regards, Rod ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |