Re: [Springframework-developer] Example classes needed

[Ken K. <kk...@kk...>]

+1 for 1b and 2c. I think excess version info in the names creates more 
problems than it solves.

Ken

jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote:

>Lars,
>
>The problem is that we have multiple jar files:
>- spring-beans.jar
>- spring-aop.jar
>- spring-jdbc.jar
>- spring-orm.jar
>- spring-context.jar
>- spring-full.jar
>
>"full" indicates that it includes all of Spring. We could name it "spring.jar" of course, I'm quite inclined towards this if others agree. What does everybody think?
>
>Regarding Colin's argument on in-between numbering: I wouldn't mind dropping the version number altogether, in Hibernate/Ant/Servlet style. I'm just not a fan of very specific file names.
>
>So 2 questions:
>1. a) "spring-full.jar" or b) "spring.jar" for the complete jar file
>2. a) "spring-beans-1.0m1.jar", b) "spring-beans-1.0.jar" or c) "spring-beans.jar"
>
>In the meantime, I tend to vote 1b and 2c. I wouldn't mind 1a or 2b either, though.
>
>Juergen
>
>
>  
>