[Springframework-developer] =?iso-8859-1?Q?RE:_[Springframework-developer]_Example_classes_needed?=

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

Juergen,=0D=0A=0D=0AWhy could we not have spring-<module_part>.jar for in=
complete jars and spring.jar for the full package?=0D=0A=0D=0AI vote for =
1b and 2c for consistency.=0D=0A2a and 2b are not consistent with the ful=
l package name.=0D=0A=0D=0AJean-Pierre=0D=0A=0D=0A---------- Initial Head=
er -----------=0D=0A=0D=0AFrom      : springframework-developer-admin@lis=
ts.sourceforge.net=0D=0ATo          : "Lars Fischer" <lars.fischer@gmxpro=
.net>=0D=0ACc          : <spr...@li...=
>,<tri...@tr...>,<rod...@in...>=0D=0ADate      : Thu=
, 28 Aug 2003 18:07:42 +0200=0D=0ASubject : RE: [Springframework-develope=
r] Example classes needed=0D=0A=0D=0ALars,=0D=0A=0D=0AThe problem is that=
 we have multiple jar files:=0D=0A- spring-beans.jar=0D=0A- spring-aop.ja=
r=0D=0A- spring-jdbc.jar=0D=0A- spring-orm.jar=0D=0A- spring-context.jar=0D=
=0A- spring-full.jar=0D=0A=0D=0A"full" indicates that it includes all of =
Spring. We could name it "spring.jar" of course, I'm quite inclined towar=
ds this if others agree. What does everybody think?=0D=0A=0D=0ARegarding =
Colin's argument on in-between numbering: I wouldn't mind dropping the ve=
rsion number altogether, in Hibernate/Ant/Servlet style. I'm just not a f=
an of very specific file names.=0D=0A=0D=0ASo 2 questions:=0D=0A1. a) "sp=
ring-full.jar" or b) "spring.jar" for the complete jar file=0D=0A2. a) "s=
pring-beans-1.0m1.jar", b) "spring-beans-1.0.jar" or c) "spring-beans.jar=
"=0D=0A=0D=0AIn the meantime, I tend to vote 1b and 2c. I wouldn't mind 1=
a or 2b either, though.=0D=0A=0D=0AJuergen=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A-----Original=
 Message-----=0D=0AFrom: Lars Fischer [mailto:lar...@gm...]=0D=
=0ASent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:56 PM=0D=0ATo: j=FCrgen h=F6ller [we=
rk3AT]=0D=0ACc: spr...@li...; trisberg=
@tridb.com;=0D=...@in...=0D=0ASubject: RE: [Springfra=
mework-developer] Example classes needed=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AWhat about spri=
ng.jar, spring2.jar ? I don't like this "-full".=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A> Hmmm,=
 not much response yet... I still tend to prefer "sp=0D=0A> ring-full-1.0=
.jar", for easy drop-in. IMO, a jar file doe=0D=0A> s not need to reflect=
 the exact detail version. I conside=0D=0A> r it fine enough if it indica=
tes the major version. See s=0D=0A> ervlet.jar, hibernate2.jar. Can we pl=
ease decide on this =0D=0A> until *tomorrow*? :-)=0D=0A>  =0D=0A> Juergen=
=0D=0A>  =0D=0A>  =0D=0A> =0D=0A> -----Original =0D=0A> Message-----=0D=0A=
> From: j=C3=BCrgen h=C3=B6ller [werk3AT] =0D=0A> Sent: Mon=0D=0A> day, A=
ugust 25, 2003 11:50 PM=0D=0A> To: Lars Fischer; springfr=0D=0A> amework-=
dev...@li...=0D=0A> Cc: trisberg@tri=0D=0A> db.com=0D=0A=
> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Example =0D=0A> classes needed=
=0D=0A> =0D=0A> =0D=0A> Let's vote on this. I don't mind eith=0D=0A> er n=
aming strategy for jar files. Anybody else prefering =0D=0A> the spring-f=
ull-1.0m1 style?=0D=0A>  =0D=0A> BTW, Hibernate uses hibe=0D=0A> rnate2.j=
ar for its whole 2.x tree. Log4J uses log4j-1.2.8=0D=0A> .jar for the spe=
cific version. 2 examples for opposite en=0D=0A> ds, I guess.=0D=0A>  =0D=
=0A> Juergen=0D=0A>  =0D=0A>  =0D=0A> =0D=0A> -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Nac=
=0D=0A> hricht----- =0D=0A> Von: Lars Fischer [mailto:lars.fischer@gmxp=0D=
=0A> ro.net] =0D=0A> Gesendet: Mo 25.08.2003 23:18 =0D=0A> An: springfram=
e=0D=0A> wor...@li... =0D=0A> Cc: j=C3=BCrgen h=C3=
=B6lle=0D=0A> r [werk3AT]; tri...@tr... =0D=0A> Betreff: Re: [Sprin=
gfra=0D=0A> mework-developer] Example classes needed=0D=0A> =0D=0A> =0D=0A=
> =0D=0A> I agree w=0D=0A> ith Thomas, I once made a mistake because I di=
dn't realiz=0D=0A> e=0D=0A> that I was using an older version. The jar-fi=
les shoul=0D=0A> d be named after=0D=0A> the version.=0D=0A> =0D=0A> > Ju=
ergen,=0D=0A> >=0D=0A> > The dr=0D=0A> awback then is that you can't tell=
 from the jar file if i=0D=0A> t is M1, M2=0D=0A> > or=0D=0A> > the relea=
se jar.=0D=0A> >=0D=0A> > Thomas=0D=0A> >=0D=0A> > =0D=0A> > It's gonna b=
e "spring-framework-1.0m1" and "spring-full=0D=0A> -1.0.jar", if we=0D=0A=
> > stick=0D=0A> > > to the current plan. We've=0D=0A>  used the same nam=
ing strategy for 0.9.x, e.g.=0D=0A> > > "spri=0D=0A> ng-framework-0.9.1" =
but still "spring-full-0.9.jar". I pr=0D=0A> efer that=0D=0A> > way=0D=0A=
> > > to ease drop-in replacement in the =0D=0A> literal sense :-) The bu=
ild=0D=0A> > properties=0D=0A> > > reflect th=0D=0A> is in "spring-versio=
n=3D1.0" and "spring-version-detail=3D1.0=0D=0A> m1".=0D=0A> > > =0D=0A> =
> > Juergen=0D=0A> > > =0D=0A> > > =0D=0A> > >=0D=0A> > >     -----Ur=0D=0A=
> spr=C3f=C2=BCngliche Nachricht-----=0D=0A> > >     Von: trisberg@trid=0D=
=0A> b.com [ mailto:tri...@tr...]=0D=0A> > >     Gesendet: Mo =0D=0A=
> 25.08.2003 19:21=0D=0A> > >     An: j=C3f=C2=BCrgen h=C3f=C2=B6ller [we=
rk3A=0D=0A> T]=0D=0A> > >     Cc: Lars Fischer; springframework-developer=
@l=0D=0A> ists.sourceforge.net=0D=0A> > >     Betreff: RE: [Springframewo=
=0D=0A> rk-developer] Example classes needed=0D=0A> > >    =0D=0A> > >   =
 =0D=0A> >=0D=0A>  >=0D=0A> > >     Juergen,=0D=0A> > >    =0D=0A> > >   =
  > Anyway, ContextL=0D=0A> oaderServlet *will* be in 1.0 M1, to be relea=
sed at=0D=0A> > th=0D=0A> e=0D=0A> > > end=0D=0A> > >     > of this week =
if there aren't any ma=0D=0A> jor obstacles. BTW, can everybody=0D=0A> > =
> please=0D=0A> > >     > =0D=0A> test the current CVS contents against o=
wn applications?=0D=0A> > >     >=0D=0A> > >    =0D=0A> > >     I am upda=
ting the Step-by-ste=0D=0A> p-MVC document - what will the exact name=0D=0A=
> > of=0D=0A> > > the=0D=0A> =0D=0A> > >     directory and the jar file b=
e?  I'm assuming 'sp=0D=0A> ring-framework-1.0M1'=0D=0A> > and=0D=0A> > >=
     'spring-full-1.0M1.=0D=0A> jar'.=0D=0A> > >    =0D=0A> > >     Thoma=
s=0D=0A> > >    =0D=0A> > >=0D=0A> > >=0D=0A> >=0D=0A> >=0D=0A> >=0D=0A> =
=0D=0A> =0D=0A> =0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A---------------------------------=
----------------------=0D=0AThis sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek=0D=
=0AWelcome to geek heaven.=0D=0Ahttp://thinkgeek.com/sf=0D=0A____________=
___________________________________=0D=0ASpringframework-developer mailin=
g lis...@li...=0D=0Ahttps://=
lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer=0D=0A=0A=0A=
********** L'ADSL A 20 EUR/MOIS********** =0AAvec Tiscali, l'ADSL est =E0=
 20 EUR/mois. Vous pourrez chercher longtemps avant de trouver moins cher=
 ! =0APour profiter de cette offre exceptionnelle, cliquez ici : http://r=
egister.tiscali.fr/adsl/=0AOffre soumise =E0 conditions.=0A